Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

6 squads in playoffs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ward
    replied
    Ok, I used immaterial instead of irrelevant, but sorry I don't check every inch of my grammar when I make a post in TW forums. "very" is just what I had in mind

    Leave a comment:


  • MetalHeadz
    replied
    Nice point Ward. However, there was a certain word that really made me think 'wow, he's some worthless dumbfuck who's trying so hard to use complex verbose in order to make his point seem more important.'

    Originally posted by Ward View Post
    in regular season is very immaterial of how a squad could perform in playoffs
    Firstly 'immaterial' cannot be used in this sentence both semantically and grammatically. Secondly, something can't be 'very' immaterial. Immaterial is a definite, there cannot be any pre-adjectival determinant. A more appropriate word would have been 'misrepresentative.'
    Last edited by MetalHeadz; 02-25-2007, 07:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ward
    started a topic 6 squads in playoffs?

    6 squads in playoffs?

    I understand the number TWL squads have been cut down to 12, but how are the 6 playoff squads going to play each other out..?

    From what I understand it will go in either of the two ways:

    Two squads automatically advance to semi-finals and other four battle it out between themselves (sounds unfair?)

    Or the six squads battle each other out in first week of playoffs, then two of them play each other and one advances to finals (sounds unfair?)

    The advancement system based on +/- in regular season is very immaterial of how a squad could perform in playoffs. If that's the way it's going to happen, expect a lot of hassle and complaining.

    So how is it going to work? <_<
    Last edited by Ward; 02-25-2007, 06:46 AM.
Working...
X