Plade appeal

[Exalt]

who cares anymore

my thought on this whole thing is that the guy went 7-10 and puma still won

plade lost to puma, and because of that they are embarrassed, understandably so

and now they want to complain about rules being broken so they can get a rematch, but in the end, it was one player that did 7-10 that your trying to nitpick to get a rematch. THE GUY WENT NEGATIVE

i know you guys want to win, but you shouldve won it in the beginning vs puma, a rematch wont prove anything but how much of a waste it was to even cry about the loss

[Dethdefire]

who cares anymore

my thought on this whole thing is that the guy went 7-10 and puma still won

plade lost to puma, and because of that they are embarrassed, understandably so

and now they want to complain about rules being broken so they can get a rematch, but in the end, it was one player that did 7-10 that your trying to nitpick to get a rematch. THE GUY WENT NEGATIVE

i know you guys want to win, but you shouldve won it in the beginning vs puma, a rematch wont prove anything but how much of a waste it was to even cry about the loss

Like I said before, the game vrs plade is only one game. Because of staffs poor decision making he may have the opportunity to play in 6+ more twl games and effect the outcome of TWL through playing in more than one game in two TWL leagues.

[Shadowmere]

OK I'm getting confused, so lets clear this up.

1) Sisqo leaves Paladen 11/10 at 1:55PM
2) NO <3 joins Puma 11/11 at 2:03PM

I take it you spoke to Falk on sunday at 4-5PM, when Puma had already been invited to TWL and accepted it, which naturally, as you can tell, was already too late.
NO <3 joined Puma before Heracy's game came to a conclusion, when TWL invitation to Puma had NOT yet arrived. Which means nobody yet knew Puma would be invited to TWL.

Between leaving and joining Puma he was granted the freedom of the waiting time of 48 hours. From a TWL squad, he joined into a TWD squad. He was not allowed to join a TWL squad. He didn't, however he got lucky and Puma was invited to TWL. Since he didn't join a TWL squad, he was eligible to play.

The only thing I get from this is that Falk knew Sisqo as NO <3 and wasn't nice enough to bypass the waiting period. Someone was, and that's that.

[Dethdefire]

OK I'm getting confused, so lets clear this up.

1) Sisqo leaves Paladen 11/10 at 1:55PM
2) NO <3 joins Puma 11/11 at 2:03PM

I take it you spoke to Falk on sunday at 4-5PM, when Puma had already been invited to TWL and accepted it, which naturally, as you can tell, was already too late.
NO <3 joined Puma before Heracy's game came to a conclusion, when TWL invitation to Puma had NOT yet arrived. Which means nobody yet knew Puma would be invited to TWL.

Between leaving and joining Puma he was granted the freedom of the waiting time of 48 hours. From a TWL squad, he joined into a TWD squad. He was not allowed to join a TWL squad. He didn't, however he got lucky and Puma was invited to TWL. Since he didn't join a TWL squad, he was eligible to play.

The only thing I get from this is that Falk knew Sisqo as NO <3 and wasn't nice enough to bypass the waiting period. Someone was, and that's that.

How freaking clear do I have to make this. This is the log from Paladen's TWD roster when sisqo left, combined with the time pascone gave for no <3 joining puma. Pascone is obvously confused on the time sisqo left Paladen.

SISQO's application accepted by Dethdefire 2007-11-10 02:17:32
SISQO left the squad. 2007-11-11 13:59:39

Pascone>sunday 2:03pm sisqo joins puma


13:59 = 2:00pm sisqo left Paladen (on sunday the 11th)
14:03 = 2:03pm No <3 joins Puma (on Sunday the 11th)
15:00 = 3:00pm Puma accept TWL invite (on Sunday the 11th)

02:17 = 2:17am Sisqo's 48 hours is up after leaving paladen (on monday the 12th)

So in less then 5 minutes, durring TWL, Sisqo found a TWD op to add his alias no <3 to pumas roster manually? YEAH RIGHT!

[Shadowmere]

Lol well.. Not my fault if you don't believe pascone and his times. However nothing's impossible. So I'm just gonna drop it. As far as the currently given info, no <3 was eligible to play.

[Dethdefire]

Lol well.. Not my fault if you don't believe pascone and his times. However nothing's impossible. So I'm just gonna drop it. As far as the currently given info, no <3 was eligible to play.

Its not my fault that your to stupid to realize that I am a captain of Paladen and the times I just posted are from our TWD site. By those times it was HIGHLY unlikly that a TWD op had placed no <3 on the roster manually. Based on the conversation I had with falk around 4:00pm sisqo had rostered his alias illeagaly.

[Shadowmere]

So angry. I bet you can see Puma's action history as well.

[Dethdefire]

So angry. I bet you can see Puma's action history as well.

I don't need to see pumas action history, pascone already posted it. Pay the hell attention or don't post.

[Shadowmere]

Lets get this to trash talk.

You were proven wrong and then you didn't believe that he got a TWD op to bypass his 48 hour waiting period in that few minutes, so what are you going for then?

[Dethdefire]

Lets get this to trash talk.

You were proven wrong and then you didn't believe that he got a TWD op to bypass his 48 hour waiting period in that few minutes, so what are you going for then?

Sertifi, did you get lost on the way to the General forum? How was I proven wrong? Come back when you can comprehend half these posts without confusing yourself.

[Shadowmere]

Let me make it more clear to you: You're forcing your only argument: No <3 was given a bypass on the waiting period.

He was eligible to play. You were proven wrong.

[Dethdefire]

Let me make it more clear to you: You're forcing your only argument: No <3 was given a bypass on the waiting period.

He was eligible to play. You were proven wrong.

Let me make it more clear to you. My argument is based off the fact that he was not given a bypass by the time that I had spoke to falk around 4:00pm. He illeagally rostered an alias at 2:03pm. I highly doubt a TWD op manually rostered his alias to Puma in less than 4 minutes after he left paladen. As I already asked, I would love to know who that may have been. There has been no evidence of a twd op rostering No <3 to puma durring that 4 minute window of time, before puma was accepted into TWL. So at this point I have not been proven wrong. Even if the fact does come to light that no <3 was given a bypass later in the evening, I still stand by my opinion that the TWL ops should take the responsibility to correct the actions of the TWD ops when those actions conflict with TWL. The bypass was given to no <3 after puma accepted their TWL invite thus he would not be eligable (unless for what ever reason the TWD op didnt force No <3 off and then back on the roster as I was told).

[Shadowmere]

It's impossible to register 2 names without the help of a TWD op. He couldn't have "illegally" rostered the name NO <3 to Puma roster.

It's not TWL ops' job to take care of TWD ops' job. Whether it's your opinion or not.

[Dethdefire]

It's impossible to register 2 names without the help of a TWD op. He couldn't have "illegally" rostered the name NO <3 to Puma roster.

It's not TWL ops' job to take care of TWD ops' job. Whether it's your opinion or not.

Its not impossible to apply on TWD with them which is a question i had asked falk. No <3's name was supposedly not registered, but he was rostered on TWD. any way, im way to tired to continue this and you obviously have everything figured out (lol).. good night!

[Mela]

asdf

WHY THE FUCK do we even have a 48h rule (or w/e) if we're not going to obey that?

thx