Ripper>cant pee with a hard on
apt>yes u can wtf
apt>you need to clear the pipes after a nice masturbation
apt>i just put myself in a wierd position
apt>so i dont miss the toilet
Ripper>but after u masterbaition it usually goes down
apt>na
apt>ill show you pictures
apt>next time I masturbate
Invisible player on Disoblige - 9 times. With leaving 1 spot open for another player, maybe myself, I can see myself doing pretty good next to an invisible player. -_-
TWLJ:
Viper54 10 times. Well I couldn't make up my mind so I, 4 times bought and sold him till the last time I was pretty sure about my decision to kept him. -_-
See in TWLM its best to keep your choices or "good finds" to yourself or between a few people and not on a public forum. That way your team is better than everybody else's.
Also if you know somebody can't make their match this week for some reason you keep it to yourself, more than half of the challenge of this TWLM is deciding who will show up and play for each squad.
Im still not clear on the goal. Do I want people who will get a good rec, or people whose squads will win the game? or is it some formula that's a combination of the two?
for example:
I woudl buy myself for basing, becuase I think I'll win a lot, but I only get like 6 kills per game. am I a good buy?
I shouldn't say this if I want to win or get high up on the ranks on TWL-M, but for the sake of making it interesting, you guys have to look at who those ppl will be facing. Then, make adjustments from there.
I think the $1000 limit needs to be increased. The way it is, very very few people would be silly enough to buy almost any1 on Elusive, Light, Rampage .... For example im $304 for a WB, I know ill do better than most players but $304 is almost a third of the limit. It appears that any sane person would just go and buy 2 cheap players who will get a lot of play on mid level squads and probably get the majority of their team's kill whether they win or lose. I cant see a formula yet for this so I have no idea at what rate values change based on performance. Meaning, I have no idea whether $304 is worth it. Right now people are just looking at players they think are undervalued compared to the majority and buying them. Yes Jack is a good player but how well will he have to do to make up for his $600 cost????? Thats what I need to know
Comment