Appeal TWL-D LEGO vs Dynasty

[PrOnEsSim]

I wasn't thereto witness it but from the sound of it looks like a reverse decision IMO. BS If its not.

[olde]

Let the drama of rookie TWL-ops start now!!

[Stayon]

Mark makes the good call, as it was unfair not being able to sub in someone for one team and the other having a player being added ignoring the temporary roster lock.

[Attacks]

I really don't see why lego have to pay for this mistake, they played well and dynasty still had a strong line up they might otherwise have played anyway. Errors happen and must be learned from going forward not punishing a team who did nothing wrong.
However that being said,had I been in dynasty, or this happened to Force I might well be speaking differently so I can understand the Dynasty appeal.

[Wage]

Mark makes the good call, as it was unfair not being able to sub in someone for one team and the other having a player being added ignoring the temporary roster lock.

They also had a player added ignoring the roster lock so there shouldn't be an argument there, yet we are the only ones being punished for it. and paky was like 3-7 and their sub was "vermillion flame"..

[Zeebu]

i dont think you should appeal. just make sure lego doesnt have the ability to sub at some point later on. then they can also not appeal. everything is fair.

[Major Crisis]

They also had a player added ignoring the roster lock so there shouldn't be an argument there, yet we are the only ones being punished for it. and paky was like 3-7 and their sub was "vermillion flame"..

Damn how did he do that? Go from 3-7 to 2-10.