2009 * Rating Thread

[Burnt]

if 8 is a twl starter 9 is a twl impact player and 7 is a player who only played 1-2 twl games

then why the fuck are me and kk 7s? stupid rankings really, but it doesnt matter

with the way some people are ranked, its obvious a lot of players don't know how to judge other players' skill levels

from: http://forums.trenchwars.org/showpos...67&postcount=8
6 = impact TWD player/ started 1 or 2 games TWL games
7 = consistent TWL starter
8 = impact player
9 = top 10 in league
10 = top 3-5 in league

Kid Kaos was 65-76 last season in TWL, so 7 is a fair ranking
Exalt was 84-74 so you could argue he's an 8 or a 7, depending on your definition of "impact"


Cres, 7 is consistent TWL starter, what squad have you started for again?
You're lucky to get a 6 considering you don't even average 1:1 in TWD (http://twd.trenchwars.org/profile/85291/stats) but according to: http://www.trenchwars.org/index.php?...&sb.x=6&sb.y=6 you're using 1280x800 resolution so how can you expect to be near as good as the players who use 1280x1024 and see over 25% more of the screen?

Overall the ratings a pretty good, not perfect but almost no one is more than 1 rating point off where they should be.

[Mega Newbie]

Why do you ppl care so much about those ratings LOL
its not like a number will define how good u play

[tragiK]

from: http://forums.trenchwars.org/showpos...67&postcount=8
6 = impact TWD player/ started 1 or 2 games TWL games
7 = consistent TWL starter
8 = impact player
9 = top 10 in league
10 = top 3-5 in league

Kid Kaos was 65-76 last season in TWL, so 7 is a fair ranking
Exalt was 84-74 so you could argue he's an 8 or a 7, depending on your definition of "impact"


Cres, 7 is consistent TWL starter, what squad have you started for again?
You're lucky to get a 6 considering you don't even average 1:1 in TWD (http://twd.trenchwars.org/profile/85291/stats) but according to: http://www.trenchwars.org/index.php?...&sb.x=6&sb.y=6 you're using 1280x800 resolution so how can you expect to be near as good as the players who use 1280x1024 and see over 25% more of the screen?

Overall the ratings a pretty good, not perfect but almost no one is more than 1 rating point off where they should be.

this is why burnt was asked to captain again

[Cuji]

I should be 4-3-4 (bottom of the list! )

[Kid Kaos]

I only started like 2 games for dynasty including the twld playoff vs HEAVY. Most of the rest are from sub-ins. I was not very active for most of last TWL.

[Exalt]

Kid Kaos was 65-76 last season in TWL, so 7 is a fair ranking
Exalt was 84-74 so you could argue he's an 8 or a 7, depending on your definition of "impact"

define "impact" for me burnt I mvped for my team almost every game, carried a big game when i needed to that would've decided playoffs or not when my team was struggling, and basically was alone with unabled when geio left midseason, rest of the squad was inactive, and kk was rusty, and managed to take the squad to playoffs, I think i did fairly well... oh and was top 5 in twl stats in wb, although I dont really care if im a 7 or 8 in twdt, but the point was worth mentioning that I disagreed, and another post I read said 7 was a player who started like 2 twl games and 8 was reg twl starter... so its why i was wondering wtf was up

Cres, 7 is consistent TWL starter, what squad have you started for again?
You're lucky to get a 6 considering you don't even average 1:1 in TWD (http://twd.trenchwars.org/profile/85291/stats) but according to: http://www.trenchwars.org/index.php?...&sb.x=6&sb.y=6 you're using 1280x800 resolution so how can you expect to be near as good as the players who use 1280x1024 and see over 25% more of the screen?

Overall the ratings a pretty good, not perfect but almost no one is more than 1 rating point off where they should be.

i'll agree, most players are around where they should be, or only 1 point off

some are a little overrated, but they are overrated despite twdt, not because of it, so its fine

in defense to cres though, most of evil isn't even 1:1 or is barely 1:1 in twd average too, but I'm sure cres probably cares a little more since he is a newer up and coming player

[tragiK]

but I'm sure cres probably cares a little more since he is a newer up and coming player

so why do you care so much? lol

[Exalt]

so why do you care so much? lol

was talking about the twd average at the time, twl i do care about though, and probably will see me care a lot more now with ladder reset

[Summa]

I am looking to have the ratings done by this Sunday for the caps. Apps in order to be eligible for the draft are closing come Friday. If you're submitting ratings then do it soon. Also Exalt, I think you have defended yourself enough, if you prove you're good in the season then it will pay off next season when it is stat based twlm style. I would prefer if this remains slightly on topic, although I know ego bruising must occur and I have allowed for flex room.

[Kid Kaos]

I just dont think megaman89 deserves a 8* rating in wb especially if you are basing thise on last twld stats. The fact that dice wasnt even in TWLD last year is the main point... he didnt play a single game. so how was he a impact twld player?

[Summa]

I just dont think megaman89 deserves a 8* rating in wb especially if you are basing thise on last twld stats. The fact that dice wasnt even in TWLD last year is the main point... he didnt play a single game. so how was he a impact twld player?

its based upon the past 2 twls and the past twdt, i prefer 3 sets of statistics to draw upon (source material), rather than 1

[Draft]

but according to: http://www.trenchwars.org/index.php?...&sb.x=6&sb.y=6 you're using 1280x800 resolution so how can you expect to be near as good as the players who use 1280x1024 and see over 25% more of the screen?

wow thanks, i just noticed im '1024x768'

>>http://www.trenchwars.org/index.php?v=pubstats&x=prof&s=rating&player=Draft& sb.x=0&sb.y=0<<

how am i so good on a small screen, cant imagine what i'll do on anything bigger lOL

[Exalt]

its based upon the past 2 twls and the past twdt, i prefer 3 sets of statistics to draw upon (source material), rather than 1

well if thats the case then apok and racka clearly arent 10* wbs either

[Summa]

well if thats the case then apok and racka clearly arent 10* wbs either

well one, being more recent is obviously more influential, at least in terms of the ratings i filled out. other people may have solely done last twl, some people may have just said fuck humid, his rating system is retarded, let me do it my own way.....oh and i hate eelam so let me give him a rating of 12. i cannot control that. what i can say though, is that next season ardour will have the new site up and all of this will be avoided. it will become put up or shut up time, not subjective preferences.

[Exalt]

well one, being more recent is obviously more influential, at least in terms of the ratings i filled out. other people may have solely done last twl, some people may have just said fuck humid, his rating system is retarded, let me do it my own way.....oh and i hate eelam so let me give him a rating of 12. i cannot control that. what i can say though, is that next season ardour will have the new site up and all of this will be avoided. it will become put up or shut up time, not subjective preferences.

well im fine with it, im pretty much over the whole * rating thing anyway, I was just being a smartass

still don't see how racka is a 10* though