Statistics TWDT 2019 Summer

[Majorcrisis2]

Also made a sheet with games played over the last 3 seasons (These are the seasons I have made the stats)
If you miss someone, or see a double alias please tell. I tried to cover the aliases and add people from last seasons.

Here

[Majorcrisis2]

Is there something wrong with the overall stats for terriers? At least me and bitsaver are 82 and 100 in terr but only 27 and 19 in the overall base

Fixed, prob was still on the old vlookup number from last season... Thanks for noticing!

[PrOnEsSim]

When you miss a week from TWDT, drop from #7 to 18. FeelsBadMan.

[ogron]

Great work Major, thanks!

[Zizzo]

Looks like those 27 and 19 are actually our deaths not rating

[Zizzo]

Is there something wrong with the overall stats for terriers? At least me and bitsaver are 82 and 100 in terr but only 27 and 19 in the overall base

[Majorcrisis2]

Thanks. Any chance you can add my game 2 week 1 wb stats to spider?

Maybe, but will have to reduce the Teks stat on that game. Because Teks is one of the 3 influences on the rating. And wb makes it often way easier to tek than spider.

[ronaldinho]

Thanks MC. It's unfortunate I'm still the worst javelin in the league.

[Vys]

Thanks. Any chance you can add my game 2 week 1 wb stats to spider?

[Majorcrisis2]

Stats are all updated again.

[Majorcrisis2]

I think the Conf. has way too big effect to the total rating. If you're playing multiple ships you get punished in both ratings even if you've played decently. Not sure what would be the best way to fix that though. Maybe not have conf. for individual ships but only for the overall rating? It's still an important metric overall.

Its kinda a mess atm, because i am too lazy to change the confidence formula every week. But last season i made it 7-8 out of 10 games played is 100%. Yes, if u play multiple ships it hurts, but if you play a ship 2x really good and never again, your score will be lopsided too much in the ratings. I was thinking about 10 out of 14 for the 100%, but i will decide on that the more games are played to see whats fair.

and i think an overall confidence in basing will be too much work for me to count. Or lets say i am too lazy to put more work in it LOL

[Majorcrisis2]

How about a KillDeathRatio for spider, you have it for terr. (Although you have it as KDA...what's the a?)

Kill death average.

[Rab]

I agree confidence is too hard to obtain. As it stands you're ranking people by how many games they've played rather than how good they are. About 25% per game seems reasonable to me.

[Zizzo]

I think the Conf. has way too big effect to the total rating. If you're playing multiple ships you get punished in both ratings even if you've played decently. Not sure what would be the best way to fix that though. Maybe not have conf. for individual ships but only for the overall rating? It's still an important metric overall.

[Nipple Nibbler]

How about a KillDeathRatio for spider, you have it for terr. (Although you have it as KDA...what's the a?)