Kazaa Source Scandals

[THE ENFORCER]

What he means is that the peer to peer software itself is not illegal. Therefor kazza can't be sued for illegal use of their software, the people sharing can be sued.

Like i said before im sure a lawyer will be able to find a way out of that problem.

Its like driving the get a way car for a robber. They are still providing the means.

[sTuPiD-gErBiL]

no, it's not. a comparable analogy would be trying to sue a metalworker who designs rifle barrels just because some random fucktard bought a rifle containing that particular barrel and shot someone.

[kamakazi-insomniac]

If you download software off of kazza you a fucking idiot (am i allowd to say that with this new forum?). Do the words VIRUS or TROJANS mean any thing to you kids. Go run a search for somthing like speed + kazza and check the ammount of unamed programs come up. But by all means if you want it go download it, let me know what happens to your computer.

[THE ENFORCER]

If you download software off of kazza you a fucking idiot (am i allowd to say that with this new forum?). Do the words VIRUS or TROJANS mean any thing to you kids. Go run a search for somthing like speed + kazza and check the ammount of unamed programs come up. But by all means if you want it go download it, let me know what happens to your computer.

No one is downloading software off Kazaa i just misinterpreted stupid gerbal's statement which vitron cleared up.

[THE ENFORCER]

no, it's not. a comparable analogy would be trying to sue a metalworker who designs rifle barrels just because some random fucktard bought a rifle containing that particular barrel and shot someone.

But buying rifles is legal, downloading songs isnt. Thats an important distinction. If the metal work made a rifle that was illegal (especially powerful) then yes he will be countable.

[sTuPiD-gErBiL]

But buying rifles is legal, downloading songs isnt. Thats an important distinction. If the metal work made a rifle that was illegal (especially powerful) then yes he will be countable.

jesus christ, you're dense.

peer-to-peer software is NOT illegal. the software can be used to distribute non-copyright material just as easily as it can be used to distribute movies and mp3s. for that reason, the only "guilty parties" are the people who distribute illegal material using that software. if you'd ever bother reading the license agreements of the p2p service you use, you'd see something like this:

Kazaa makes no representations or warranties regarding the files downloaded by Kazaa's users. Copying or distributing unauthorized files may violate copyright laws. Compliance with the copyright law is solely the user's responsibility.

in other words, you do what you want at your own risk. if you get caught, the company can't be held accountable. you've already agreed to this and all of the other legalities in the disclaimer.

[THE ENFORCER]

jesus christ, you're dense.

peer-to-peer software is NOT illegal. the software can be used to distribute non-copyright material just as easily as it can be used to distribute movies and mp3s. for that reason, the only "guilty parties" are the people who distribute illegal material using that software. if you'd ever bother reading the license agreements of the p2p service you use, you'd see something like this:

Kazaa makes no representations or warranties regarding the files downloaded by Kazaa's users. Copying or distributing unauthorized files may violate copyright laws. Compliance with the copyright law is solely the user's responsibility.


in other words, you do what you want at your own risk. if you get caught, the company can't be held accountable. you've already agreed to this and all of the other legalities in the disclaimer.

The only thing saving that company (which is what you should of stated in the first place) is that exclusion clause and any first year law student would know that there are plenty of ways to get around an exclusion clause since there isnt any actual signing, for example when i downloaded the program i didnt see that clause. From Thornton V Shoe Lane Parking Notifcation about a contractual clause after the entry into the contract is ineffective.
Which goes back to my earlier point (repeating myself once again) lawyers are able to find a way to sue anyone, thats thier job! And btw your dense!

[Blood]

The only thing saving that company (which is what you should of stated in the first place) is that exclusion clause and any first year law student would know that there are plenty of ways to get around an exclusion clause since there isnt any actual signing, for example when i downloaded the program i didnt see that clause. From Thornton V Shoe Lane Parking Notifcation about a contractual clause after the entry into the contract is ineffective.
Which goes back to my earlier point (repeating myself once again) lawyers are able to find a way to sue anyone, thats thier job! And btw your dense!

you are certainly the most thick-headed fucking idiot ever to grace the tw forums with his presence

[Awesome]

you are certainly the most thick-headed fucking idiot ever to grace the tw forums with his presence

Look up some posts written by abrasion, ice storm or the king of fags, Zeta-Burn

[ZeUs!!]

scandelous!!!

[THE ENFORCER]

you are certainly the most thick-headed fucking idiot ever to grace the tw forums with his presence

Im not gonna even dignify that with a proper response. All im gonna say is that you must be real proud of yourself!

[Subjugation]

Im not gonna even dignify that with a proper response. All im gonna say is that you must be real proud of yourself!

please stop assuming that people give a crap about what your opinions are. the sooner you embrace the taste of sweet gunmetal in your mouth, a better place this world would be.

[Vitron]

Like i said before im sure a lawyer will be able to find a way out of that problem.

Its like driving the get a way car for a robber. They are still providing the means.

What your really implying is that ford is in trouble because they made the car.

[THE ENFORCER]

What your really implying is that ford is in trouble because they made the car.

No the guy driving the car is in trouble, its the same reasoning with the rifle i dont know what it is like in your country but buying a car isnt illegal here!
But robbing a bank is illegal!

[Rosstones]

My lawyer could take that case.... he got ME outa jail.