Originally posted by Missa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
[MAFIA] AWOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Collapse
X
-
I agree it's very unlikely, that's just my plan as we stand now, I'll be more than willing to listen to anyone who offers something. I don't have anything, so this is my plan at this moment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the_paul View Post
so my plan is to lynch Beast/Soilderz these next 2 day phases unless something more substantial and concrete comes to light.
Leave a comment:
-
Also, paul, the reason you're scummy is the big "Peyton Manning" in your sig. I get it though, being excited about a qb.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Voth View Post
I know this wasn't directed at me, but you made me think about it again and I wanted to add to what I said before.
In a game of 12 players, I assume there are 4 scum, given that there is no indication of a third party either on ixt's game breakdown and also because there was no kills at all last night.
A scum team can, with one swift motion, take it from 8-4 to 6-4 in one night. That is insane. All they would need after that is to get another townie lynched during a day phase and the game would be all but over unless the witch was hugely clutch... but still very unlikely.
So why didnt they use the double kill last night? If I were scum, I would choose the double kill and save it for the night after a mislynch. Quick 3 player turnaround.
I'm trying to balance this in my head and the only thing that works is we are stacked on protective roles. Paul mentioned that exalt might be roleblocker, but that's not listed as a possible role this game. There are many protective roles though...
Leave a comment:
-
youre right, that was a lot of words that didnt really say a whole lot.
2 things on possible roles, i would think that at least naive would be tossed out. doesnt make any sense to me either in the game setup or that it could lead to a vote with conviction. also you mentioned roleblocker, looking at the list of possible roles i dont think any of those look like a roleblocker.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zeebu View Postpaul, if you had to choose a second choice after beast, who would it be?
Beyond that, reading it as it was going on, the Rodney/Field spat just seemed weird to me. It felt like they disagreed on something insignificant, then went over the top to make sure the disagreement was very obvious. I could have been misreading that though, but one of the major mistakes the mafia made early last game was not distancing themselves from each other early on, it's what led to Missa getting lynched right after Exalt. Maybe I'm being extra cynical, because I would assume people noticed that mistake last game, and that the mafia (or werewolves, whatever) would make an effort to not repeat that mistake. But, at the end of the day, it's basically day 1 and we have nothing to go on, so I'm left to grasp at straws. I don't feel strongly enough about either of these 2 to vote on them, but it's on my radar. Field and Rodney are both good players too, so its more likely I just misread or misinterpreted what happened.
The voth vote is weird to me too, not least because Exalt started it. Exalt is very unhappy with me and Voth from last game, so I'm automatically suspicious of his motives for voting Voth. There's a chance he investigated Voth last night and got a result and wants to test his sanity, which is understandable. I'm not sure that is worth it to me, lynching a potential town PR just to find out he's na?ve or paranoid is possible. I also do not want to know if he investigated Voth last night, because it is basically day 1 and that would be suicide to claim so early. Exalt could also be a roleblocker who targeted Voth, and is taking the no night kill as a sign that Voth was sent to make the kill that didn't happen. That would actually be a better result to gamble on than just a cop result, but it's still pretty risky since we don't know anything about doctors or anything else. In short, I have a hard time believing that there is conclusive evidence that makes the risk worth it. The only irrefutable evidence would be a tracker following someone to the person who got killed, but that's obviously not our situation.
So in short, I have said a whole lot of nothing. Rodney and Field spat strikes me as scummy, but I should be wrong. Exalt is either: salty, a cop, a roleblocker, or mafia. I'm not personally prepared to lynch Voth based on what we know, but I guess I could understand if other people think it is. Inactivity is what is killing TW mafia for a variety of reasons. People are getting burned out because they are having to force all discussion on their own, and its exhausting. I don't understand how 2 people (unless I missed a soil post) can be so busy that they can't make 1 post in the time since this started, so my plan is to lynch Beast/Soilderz these next 2 day phases unless something more substantial and concrete comes to light.
So a whole essay where I manage to avoid saying anything of substance! Pretty impressive if I do say myself. Now tell me how this makes me scummy please.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WillBy View Post
So did you like... mix up rodney and Voth? Cause field and rodney were going hard at it and voth was munching on some popcorn.
Now if you're voting Voth because exalt wants you to, that's different.
Unvote: Voth
I'll reassess and get back to you. Now I just look like an idiot LOL
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by field View Post
What's the best way for scum to use Mecha wolf?
In a game of 12 players, I assume there are 4 scum, given that there is no indication of a third party either on ixt's game breakdown and also because there was no kills at all last night.
A scum team can, with one swift motion, take it from 8-4 to 6-4 in one night. That is insane. All they would need after that is to get another townie lynched during a day phase and the game would be all but over unless the witch was hugely clutch... but still very unlikely.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WillBy View Post
To be fair, I'm also feeling a little burned out. I'll host the next one, but I think we should all take a short break
We need you.
On a serious note, the only problem I see is if people go MIA in that short break.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Undercut View PostI really just dont feel good about jumping to conclusions on exalts post. If he could elaborate some for us then it might be a solid lead that we could go off but for now
Vote: Beast
Until he manages to post something I agree with paul and getting rid of inactives.
Leave a comment:
-
For the people voting Beast:
If he does post, your votes should go off him, at least until we get a chance to get a read on him.
I will consider voting for Beast if there are no better options.
Leave a comment:
-
I really just dont feel good about jumping to conclusions on exalts post. If he could elaborate some for us then it might be a solid lead that we could go off but for now
Vote: Beast
Until he manages to post something I agree with paul and getting rid of inactives.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zeebu View Post
im not sure what to make of exalt and voth quite yet. exalt votes voth with no reasoning, which is fine, but then rodney following right away is odd. going to have to look into rodney's doings.
once again you seem to be on the lynch inactives train. while ive argued against it in the past, im starting to see that forum mafia is just not for everyone apparently. im still hesitant though becuase its early in the game yet... sort of... whatever you call this phase. beast should have had at least some sort of opportunity to post. does anyone remember beast playing in older games?
as far as forced comments, either people are talking just to talk or they are trying to insinuate they have some sort of results.
paul, if you had to choose a second choice after beast, who would it be?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the_paul View PostI don't like the way the discussions has been going on this day phase. Exalt's vote on Voth can be read that he either: A) Has some sort of result or proof that Voth is scum, or B) is still salty about how last game went down and is trying to take Voth out, or even C) Scum trying to cause chaos. Not sure what it is, but I would rather get rid of someone who has yet to post than take out someone when no reasoning has even come to light at all.
Also, the arguments that have come up definitely don't feel organic to me. They seemed really forced, which is a cause for concern. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but it seemed like a blow up over literally nothing.
Beast has yet to post, and since inactivity is my least favorite thing about TW Mafia, I'm sticking with him for the time being. I'm open to change if something more definitive comes up, but the lurkers need to go imo
once again you seem to be on the lynch inactives train. while ive argued against it in the past, im starting to see that forum mafia is just not for everyone apparently. im still hesitant though becuase its early in the game yet... sort of... whatever you call this phase. beast should have had at least some sort of opportunity to post. does anyone remember beast playing in older games?
as far as forced comments, either people are talking just to talk or they are trying to insinuate they have some sort of results.
paul, if you had to choose a second choice after beast, who would it be?
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse
Leave a comment: