Mafia 2020 #3: 14 Stories Above the Sea

[Halp]

Why would the_paul be visiting Exalt's place? I don't know of any good reason for him to do that after Exalt roleclaimed D1 as a townie who would become a cop. Until there's a substantial answer as to what he was doing being sighted at Exalt's, my vote will stay on the_paul.

This is the second best reaction to the current situation. The best reaction, of course, would be to lynch ixt because regardless of Paul’s role, ixts claim makes no sense, as kthx pointed out. I have indulged in more than one, but less than three substances that could impede my judgement, and it’s entirely likely that kthx is a scummy fuk fag who is unknowingly exploiting my current cognitive state, but we won’t know that until tomorrow. Crispy, golden waffles sound incredible right now.. fuck

[Halp]

I'm full of love and compassion.

By the way if paul did kill exalt without there being poison then IXT would have saved him if he was a bodyguard and would have died instead.

I’m a couple of pages behind, but this is a good point. Although the kill flavor was definitely poison, as it appears on the surface at least that the latent death element isn’t there. It’s also possible that poison had nothing to do with exalts death, and willby was maybe just referencing princess bride because there was some wifom situation I missed. Either way you’re right and that changes some assumptions. In my view, the only way ixt is a nnocent is if willby made a hybrid mafia role that kills with poison without the latent effect.

Still, Paul claiming seems like the Christian thing to do.

[Edify]

If its poison then paul visiting n2 means nothing. And a strongman seems absurd, even as a claimed "commuter"

Why would the_paul be visiting Exalt's place? I don't know of any good reason for him to do that after Exalt roleclaimed D1 as a townie who would become a cop. Until there's a substantial answer as to what he was doing being sighted at Exalt's, my vote will stay on the_paul.

[ixt]

last resort for scum before say bye-bye...fitting

[kthx]

And besides if you’re questioning me with bodyguard, what’s your view on Kassius with TOWN rb claim?

I trust him a hell of a lot more than you

Vote: ixt

[ixt]

And besides if you’re questioning me with bodyguard, what’s your view on Kassius with TOWN rb claim?

[ixt]

youre making remarks that have no validation of accusation. "why would the host do this....why would the host do that..." It's under the host's own choice what roles are in place (of course there would have to be reasonable balance). making those kinds of suspicions already into DAY 4 raises big red flags for anyone whos got a brain.

[ixt]

vote kthx bout to slap the taste out of your mouth fernando if i gotta repeat myself once more. getting very annoyed

[ixt]

regardless its an underlying piece of information thats unanswered

[kthx]

And again why would the host put a bodyguard into a game with either a poisoner or a strong man

[kthx]

If its poison then paul visiting n2 means nothing. And a strongman seems absurd, even as a claimed "commuter"

[ixt]

i will repeat it just once more. i defended exalt n2 so there must be either a strongman or a role with some sort of poison where bodyguard's protection has no use to defend against.

[ixt]

its already been established what i did n2 so i dont know why ur looping in circles.

[Edify]

I'm full of love and compassion.

By the way if paul did kill exalt without there being poison then IXT would have saved him if he was a bodyguard and would have died instead.

Ixt believes that TP is some sort of Strongman who's killing might overpowers any target and it cannot be blocked.

"A Strongman cannot be stopped from performing a kill, unless their target has commuted. A Bodyguard would essentially be stopped from protecting against a kill and would not die."

[kthx]

Who was it that kept whining about it getting quiet