Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mafia 2020 #3: 14 Stories Above the Sea

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Edify
    replied
    Pay close attention to who is voting on me because I seem 'too townie'. That is the very identity I have, so I don't particularly see any issue with how I'm purportedly behaving. Get something that holds more water than 'too townie'.

    In the beginning of the game I had wondered if there was a role that wins by hanging. Unfortunately it was not easy to find that in the wiki so I gave up. Now from Kthx I know that role is called Jester. That led me to withdraw my vote on Beast. Like Veh said, I have been after Beast all game. I'm more town than Beast is, as a vanilla townie is better than a Jester townie 10 out of 10 times. I find my posts coherent- obviously I wouldn't write them otherwise.

    People accusing me of incoherence and thin arguments need to take a harsh look at what they're doing because right now this townie neck is going into the town's own bloody noose.

    Leave a comment:


  • Beast
    replied
    you thought I was 50 proof? Nah. 100 proof!

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    Originally posted by the_paul View Post
    What are the odds that Willby would put an odd night and an even night serial killer in the game? Gotta be pretty low right? Something about Ixt not using his ability at all night 1 is really sticking with me for some reason, and I'm having trouble coming to terms with 2 protection claims so far
    I think the second protective claim was a bullshit one if you mean beast.

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    What are the odds that Willby would put an odd night and an even night serial killer in the game? Gotta be pretty low right? Something about Ixt not using his ability at all night 1 is really sticking with me for some reason, and I'm having trouble coming to terms with 2 protection claims so far

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    Quad post flailing.. good look

    Leave a comment:


  • Beast
    replied
    Originally posted by ixt View Post

    reposting this since people might not dig it out of past posts and looking at it myself...

    obviously first point of notice is exalt being the first to vote backwards out who is clear mafia and the other two following so the latter two can be exempt until further notice. Plus as he stated himself, BOTH EVILS slapped vote on exalt so hes pretty much proven unless some dirty next level shenanigans, but judging by exalt's own ability to play the game, i highly doubt it. Next point of notice is Kassius voting on Jessup, which in result appears more pro-town as if he was mafia and not knowing the set-up, running the risk of voting out the (now confirmed) third party as Jessup did have eyes on her being sus as well.

    beast's vote on bioture is a throwaway vote with no impact, as the ending segment of the phase wasn't to "lynch the inactives". adding to the cumulation of his behavior, i want to place a guess that beast COULD BE a neutral 3rd party (i.e. jester or some form of executioner). And with Willby's notorious reputation of spicing up mafia game setups, it could all very well be possible. If beast is flipped and is EITHER N.E. third party or town, i might slap vote on Vehicle following. But if beast flips scum, then i dunno.
    and you're mafia scum with that logic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Beast
    replied
    said I was town, my word not good enough?

    Leave a comment:


  • Beast
    replied
    scum were on exalt, and my ass for awhile time now, it's getting old.

    Leave a comment:


  • Beast
    replied
    VOTE EDIFY

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    Originally posted by WillBy View Post
    Vote tally:
    Beast-2 (vehicle,edify)
    exalt-2 (jessup, sdrawkcab)
    bioture-1 (beast)
    jessup-1 (kassius)
    ixt-1 (halp)
    sdrawkcab-3 (exalt, the_paul, voth)

    Dirty unvoters: ixt, hookecho
    afkers: Missa, Bioture

    10 minutes til vote lock
    reposting this since people might not dig it out of past posts and looking at it myself...

    obviously first point of notice is exalt being the first to vote backwards out who is clear mafia and the other two following so the latter two can be exempt until further notice. Plus as he stated himself, BOTH EVILS slapped vote on exalt so hes pretty much proven unless some dirty next level shenanigans, but judging by exalt's own ability to play the game, i highly doubt it. Next point of notice is Kassius voting on Jessup, which in result appears more pro-town as if he was mafia and not knowing the set-up, running the risk of voting out the (now confirmed) third party as Jessup did have eyes on her being sus as well.

    beast's vote on bioture is a throwaway vote with no impact, as the ending segment of the phase wasn't to "lynch the inactives". adding to the cumulation of his behavior, i want to place a guess that beast COULD BE a neutral 3rd party (i.e. jester or some form of executioner). And with Willby's notorious reputation of spicing up mafia game setups, it could all very well be possible. If beast is flipped and is EITHER N.E. third party or town, i might slap vote on Vehicle following. But if beast flips scum, then i dunno.

    Leave a comment:


  • ixt
    replied
    willyby?

    Leave a comment:


  • Vehicle
    replied
    And maybe we should still be airing our ixt for his roleclaim?

    He's said his reason for not using it was "laziness" and that he didn't submit a pm to Willby. But Willby said that the delay in phase change was because:

    Originally posted by Willyby
    Or maybe he was busy last night and as a result hungover this morning. Most likely, a combination of several factors.
    I'm probably reading too much into that one, but ixt's roleclaim just doesn't feel right either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vehicle
    replied
    What a strange response to my post.
    • I was the first vote on Beast
    • edify (who has been pointing the finger at him all game too) comes in for vote two
    • Hookecho (who?) comes in for vote 3 (ball really rolling here)
    • edify retracts his vote
    • Voth posts about a progressing bandwagon (when Beast only has 2 votes on him)
    I feel like Dan Brown here, but I can't help but think there's something here.

    I think if Beast is innocent then Hookecho and Voth are scum.

    If Beast is guilty then I think edify is as well.

    The problem is, my theory on Beast was/is pretty thin to begin with. It assumes that either Beast is Godfather and backwards was sacrificed or that the mob just royally fucked up Day 1. He also got my vote because of his wild and manic posting sprees where he often contradicts himself (claiming to have visited someone and then to have done nothing for example) and is just generally posting utter nonsense that seems to have sprung from the mind of a methhead.

    So, to be honest, I'm befuddled. Maybe I need more red yarn.

    Leave a comment:


  • kthx
    replied
    I'm starting to think Voth might be right about edify honestly. His posts are full of flimsy reasoning and they stink of trying too hard to look innocent. I'll pull off IXT for today and assume he will not be useless twice in a row. I can't take beasts claims seriously and hes trying too hard to play like an utter dipshit. He could be a jester I think.

    Unvote: IXT
    Vote: Edify

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    I don't think I can wrap my head around the idea of voting for Beast after I risked my life to save him

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X