Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Assault Rifle Ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dameon Angell
    replied
    Its not like you can waltz right into a gun shop, buy an M16 and a bucket of bullets or something all willy-nilly like. You still have to have a background check, and have proper ID, and all that stuff. The terrorists and the gangs who get a hold of those weapons go on the blackmarket and go underground to get them. The ban won't stop the blackmarkets and such.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Private420
    becausing killing just one person isnt the american way.
    Proof: Bush in Iraq
    why does every topic in this forum come back to some way to bash Bush?

    Leave a comment:


  • bloodzombie
    replied
    I dont' really care either way about this assault rifle ban, but it's a little boost for kerry, so I'm all for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob (SRB)
    replied
    when will these idiot americans learn from the british.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome Scuggs
    replied
    Originally posted by Sarien
    The "assault weapon" ban is utter nonsense, and I'm glad it's gone away, and I hope it is never renewed. You have to understand that they aren't talking about machine guns, that's banned by the machine gun act of like.. 1931 I think is the date. "Assault weapons" under that act are defined as having 2 or more "cosmetic features" of military type rifles. James Brady can rot in hell, for all I care. He wasn't shot with an assault weapon, he was shot with a pistol, and he won't be happy unless every single gun is banned. Why? Because he was on the bad end of some crazy trying to kill Reagan. Note: Some Crazy. Not a rational individual.

    I think if a person wants to own a rifle with a pistol grip, a folding stock, a 30 round magazine, a bayonet, and a flash hider, then go for it. It's not like they shoot bigger ammo, or shoot any faster. Rather than wasting time and money banning stupid crap like this, I mean come on.. a flash hider? I'd much rather see full background checks including checks for EPOs, that have the ability to deny/force a waiting period, for firearms.
    Yeah, the "assault" rifles are actually [i]semi-automatic[i] weapons. they just look badass. Nothing changes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Verthanthi
    replied
    we need them because the government has them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ilya
    replied
    to kill fat people

    Leave a comment:


  • Lethe
    replied
    Originally posted by DoTheFandango
    The question is though, why allow them to purchase them if it is no help to them and more dangerous to others that they have it.
    First of all, Hunting rifles are more powered than assault rifles so they are not more dangerous than what is already out there. Anyone could easily get a remmington 700, put a good scope on it along with a good sniper stock and you've got yourself a lethal .5 MOA sniper rifle. A setup like this would trump the Maryland sniper's setup easilly.

    Second of all, thugs are too poor to own assault rifles. Assault rifles go for 2 grand and up, the really good ones going for much more than that. A street thug will normaly carry a 50 dollar POS handgun. Note the difference in price.

    Thirdly, assault rifles are almost never used in crimes. This goes along with number 2.

    You wont be able to understand why someone would want to own an assault rifle until you've shot one.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoTheFandango
    replied
    The question is though, why allow them to purchase them if it is no help to them and more dangerous to others that they have it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sarien
    replied
    The "assault weapon" ban is utter nonsense, and I'm glad it's gone away, and I hope it is never renewed. You have to understand that they aren't talking about machine guns, that's banned by the machine gun act of like.. 1931 I think is the date. "Assault weapons" under that act are defined as having 2 or more "cosmetic features" of military type rifles. James Brady can rot in hell, for all I care. He wasn't shot with an assault weapon, he was shot with a pistol, and he won't be happy unless every single gun is banned. Why? Because he was on the bad end of some crazy trying to kill Reagan. Note: Some Crazy. Not a rational individual.

    I think if a person wants to own a rifle with a pistol grip, a folding stock, a 30 round magazine, a bayonet, and a flash hider, then go for it. It's not like they shoot bigger ammo, or shoot any faster. Rather than wasting time and money banning stupid crap like this, I mean come on.. a flash hider? I'd much rather see full background checks including checks for EPOs, that have the ability to deny/force a waiting period, for firearms.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoTheFandango
    replied
    I'm all for the second amendment, but this is crazy.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulOakenfold
    replied
    I'm not opening the club tonight so I can sit outside of my local gun store and buy a bazooka. Tommorow morning, I shall hunt with it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Selex
    replied
    Down with the new settings * raises fist *!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dameon Angell
    replied
    Originally posted by iLDuce
    to kill todays super animals, like the electric eel, and the flying squirrel

    bahahahahha

    Leave a comment:


  • Galleleo
    replied
    Arent assualt rifles meant to assault people?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X