Tweet
Originally posted by Annux
My Server provider is Mefod.
My Server provider is Mefod.
They will be put on the site with Mefods rulings.
-
Don't let any naked picture of yourselves go up guys.
They will be put on the site with Mefods rulings.gravy_: They should do great gran tourismo
gravy_: Electric granny chariots
gravy_: round the nurburgring
XBL: VodkaSurprise -
Re: Re: Re: Variable~
Originally posted by Annux
There is no point to that. URL Masks are not free. What i currently have at the run.to address is a redirecting mask at the expense of one pop-up ad. Transfering to cjb would have the idential effect except it would be a longer URL.
I think I'm just going to get rid of it and get rid of the ad in the process...people might have to type some more in, but it will be a little more pleasant to navigate. Although I can't imagine that ad being SO bothersome that people can't just close it. It only pops up once anyways.
URL masking @ cjb.net is absolutely free of any cost, no banners, no popups or anything.There's no place like 127.0.0.1Comment
-
Crap, forget it, it used to be popup free, but it isn't anymore.
Traitors...There's no place like 127.0.0.1Comment
-
annux im gonna sue you i dinna give you mah pic for putting it on the site.. why do you guys get so mad, its not like someones gonna find out where you live and eat you just because they have a pic of youOriginally posted by Yoshiba
i lag when i smoke weedComment
-
Go little Yoshi! Meet you in #prom tomorrow.Originally posted by Yoshiba
annux im gonna sue you i dinna give you mah pic for putting it on the site.. why do you guys get so mad, its not like someones gonna find out where you live and eat you just because they have a pic of you
Lots of love,
Left_EyesigpicComment
-
oh boy wut time? $$Originally posted by Yoshiba
i lag when i smoke weedComment
-
To be perfectly honest I looked at all the pics and you all look wierd. I mean really.Comment
-
wtf?Originally posted by Yoshiba
annux im gonna sue you i dinna give you mah pic for putting it on the site.. why do you guys get so mad, its not like someones gonna find out where you live and eat you just because they have a pic of youComment
-
.cjb.net has had popups for a very long time now, at least a year.
I e-mailed my pic, I hope you all like it
I feel special to be the first person to have colored hair at the Trench Wars picture gallery.Last edited by Bolt; 07-07-2002, 11:49 PM.Comment
-
Hah Nice, glad you like it.Comment
-
just a suggestion.. why don't you list the changes that have been made? Or make the link for a newly updated photo a diff color. To kind of let people know what has changed and what they should check out
-Spam
Who got the boombeef?Comment
-
17 U.S.C. section 102. Subject Matter of Copyright: In General
DISCLAIMER: The information in this post is not legal advice. Do not rely on it to be correct, do not act upon it, just read it like some cheap porno novel and throw it away. Can I be any clearer here? THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!
For anyone who's interested, here are some choice bits of the statute governing copyrights on photographic works in the USA: (I would format this according to The Bluebook, 17th Ed., but dealing with the HTML to get the margins right isn't worth the effort and nobody would care anyway.)
17 U.S.C. section 102. Subject Matter of Copyright: In General
(a) Copyright protection subsists . . . in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression . . . from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories . . . (5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
Section 101 of the Copyright Act defines "pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works" to include photographs.
Section 106 states that the copyright owner has (1) the exclusive right to "reproduce the copyrighted work. . ." Further, the copyright owner has exclusive rights to prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted work; to distribute copies of the work to the public by sale, rental, lease, etc.; and to display the copyrighted work publicly. See section 106(1), (2), (3) and (5).
And, in to conclude this summary, copyright law protects "original works of authorship," 17 U.S.C. section 102.
Now, I'm not drawing any conclusions from the statute as I've reproduced it here, but one might interpret the statute to say that posting a copyrighted photo on your website (reproduction and public display, cough cough) violates those exclusive rights, if one were a lawyer (which I'm NOT).
BUT . . it's never that simple. As CoL pointed out correctly, use of a copyrighted work may fall under the "fair use" exception of -->
17 U.S.C. section 107. Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use:
". . . the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by [section 106], for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . . scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use, the factors to be considered shall include --
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. . . "
Well, there's the statute. I can't say what it means, but there it is (in freaking black and white with distracting sections omitted). I hope this has been as enjoyable as a cheap porno novel.
Oh, and one other little thing: I don't know shit about tort law, but this Emmanuel Law Outline hornbook I found on my shelf (hmm wonder where that came from?) says that the tort of Invasion of Privacy is (in most jurisdictions) made up of four sub-torts, one of which is called Misappropriation of Identity. According to the book, Plaintiff can sue if her name or picture has been misappropriated by the defendant for his own financial benefit. (Was that a pop-up ad I saw just now?) And one more point about tort suits: even if plaintiff cannot prove actual damages, the court may order nominal damages and punitive damages in cases of intentional torts.
Well, I'd post more but I'm running out of books to cite from, and since I'm not a lawyer I can't tell you any of what this law stuff means. Maybe if someone on this board is a lawyer (or maybe a law clerk at a law firm, perhaps?) he can post a reply and explain what all this gobbledygook rhetoric of angry old white legislators means if you translate it into layman's english.
CK1:Pearl Jam> the gloves are for the prostitutes i'm going to hire
1:Pearl Jam> i'm going to make one of them shovel human feces into a wheelbarrow and run around with it
THE CRIMSO> that's more illuminative than jack's comment, but still pretty enigmatic
1:Pearl Jam> she'll have to wear a shirt that says "THE POOPSMITH" on itComment
-
oopsLast edited by Jiu_Jitsu; 07-08-2002, 02:29 AM."Can u tell me why I am called noob because I play Trench Wars?
I am full of that S**T!
Long life for TW!!!!" ~ AgniumComment
-
Well, from what I read about it, it seems that he doesn't have the right to put something up there unless he had criticism with it. How ironic.
Lots of love,
Left_EyesigpicComment
-
Ok.Originally posted by Mr. Spam
just a suggestion.. why don't you list the changes that have been made? Or make the link for a newly updated photo a diff color. To kind of let people know what has changed and what they should check outComment
Comment