Tweet
Where should contributions to the gallery be sent?
Probably the address to which pics should be sent for the gallery has been posted earlier in this thread, but for the sake of convenience maybe you could post it again, Annux? (Geez, I might send you one soon if you promise not to photoshop me into some horrible collage . . . Which would be a joint work under current copyright law and thus you could not display it without violating my copyright, but -- I digress.)
Thanks!
For the record, I think you're doing a great service by putting up a more current subspace -- it'll always be subspace to me; words with two adjacent 'u's make me nervous -- gallery. It's really interesting to see what my fellow trenchers look like. I do think, however, that you will, or do, have more than enough willing contributors of personal pics. With all those people who consent to your displaying their picture, I'm a little confounded as to why you would not remove pictures for which a lack of consent has been clearly enunciated?
Perhaps you already have removed those pictures as a courtesy to the objecting parties. If so, I think you made the right choice. Though I'm curious as to why you would not immediately have done so upon notification that the photo in question was objectionable. I mean, like, really curious. As in, I can't think of any rational reason why you would not honor someone's request not to display their picture.
Care to shed some light?
Ah, CoL, I went for interviews today and it went well -- I may have to leave the unified brotherhood of the unemployed soon. Keep fighting the good fight. . . Work is like a shit sandwich, goes down better with a lot of beer.
Ever vigilant,
CK
Probably the address to which pics should be sent for the gallery has been posted earlier in this thread, but for the sake of convenience maybe you could post it again, Annux? (Geez, I might send you one soon if you promise not to photoshop me into some horrible collage . . . Which would be a joint work under current copyright law and thus you could not display it without violating my copyright, but -- I digress.)
Thanks!
For the record, I think you're doing a great service by putting up a more current subspace -- it'll always be subspace to me; words with two adjacent 'u's make me nervous -- gallery. It's really interesting to see what my fellow trenchers look like. I do think, however, that you will, or do, have more than enough willing contributors of personal pics. With all those people who consent to your displaying their picture, I'm a little confounded as to why you would not remove pictures for which a lack of consent has been clearly enunciated?
Perhaps you already have removed those pictures as a courtesy to the objecting parties. If so, I think you made the right choice. Though I'm curious as to why you would not immediately have done so upon notification that the photo in question was objectionable. I mean, like, really curious. As in, I can't think of any rational reason why you would not honor someone's request not to display their picture.
Care to shed some light?
Ah, CoL, I went for interviews today and it went well -- I may have to leave the unified brotherhood of the unemployed soon. Keep fighting the good fight. . . Work is like a shit sandwich, goes down better with a lot of beer.
Ever vigilant,
CK
Comment