Originally posted by Galleleo
I can watch chess games and claim that since I'm smart if I studied the game hardly then I could become world class, but in reality it doesn't work that way. So I feel your chances of getting anywhere in super G are not inferior to your chances of getting anywhere in curling, except that there are probably more people in super G than in curling.
It's sorta like saying "What's so hard about darts? I can hit basketball shots all the time, I bet if I trained hard for several months I could win the Olympics in darts."
Edit: With the sports that obviously emphasize physical ability, like running, or basketball or boxing, it's pretty obvious to anyone who watches it that they have no chance at all in it. But there are also sports where it's more subtle and you don't really understand how good the practitioners are until you attempt them.
Comment