ever wondered what the statue of liberty would look like with a religious twist?

[Lucon]

Oh god, this thread is so full of absurdity that I'm not even going to touch it.

[Clump]

haha jeeny

[Chao.]

Oh god, this thread is so full of absurdity that I'm not even going to touch it.

Was Ninja-Jesus crossing the line?

[Bioture]

that statue is a stupid ass idea.

[Twerp]

Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.

Isn't there a process where a women can have the semen placed inside her? I can't remember the name, its like artificial insemenating or something. Then, couldn't she get a C section and call him Immanuel? Prophecy fulfilled

I don't know.

[Squeezer]

You were speaking of excuses used when backed into corners...

Partially. But, I don't want to get into any arugment with TK, because he is the over-analyzation master.

[Troll King]

"Overanalyzation" is your word for it?

[Squeezer]

"Overanalyzation" is your word for it?

It's probably spelled wrong

But yes, whether you admit it or not, you have a tendancy to overanylize what people say on these forums. It seems like you make whole judgements upon people based on a minor word or two.

I'm sure you'll retort with something to the effect of "I'm not over analytical, I'm just thorough," but it's true.

[Troll King]

It's also an easy excuse to use when you have no real argument to counter. That way you're either right or the other person is too overanalytical. Calling me overanalytical is just an excuse to avoid saying you were wrong.

The "minor word" in question this time was faith, but in this issue, it's not a minor word at all but the heart of the issue.

I don't make judgements on you. I approached what you said and commented on that. Your post sounds more like a judgement on me than anything I said about you.

[Squeezer]

It's also an easy excuse to use when you have no real argument to counter. That way you're either right or the other person is too overanalytical. Calling me overanalytical is just an excuse to avoid saying you were wrong.

The "minor word" in question this time was faith, but in this issue, it's not a minor word at all but the heart of the issue.

I don't make judgements on you. I approached what you said and commented on that. Your post sounds more like a judgement on me than anything I said about you.

And there you go again.

Would it help if I told you I was arguing simply for the sake of argument?

[Troll King]

Really? I thought you were trying to back out from a corner for the sake of avoiding an argument.

Don't give me that "there you go again" bullshit. You were doing the exact same thing to Superted that you're accusing me of doing, only once the shoe was on the other foot you start playing the aggrieved and innocent victim.

There. You asked for a judgement and for overanalysis, you got it. "Just for the sake of argument."

[Squeezer]

Really? I thought you were trying to back out from a corner for the sake of avoiding an argument.

Don't give me that "there you go again" bullshit. You were doing the exact same thing to Superted that you're accusing me of doing, only once the shoe was on the other foot you start playing the aggrieved and innocent victim.

There. You asked for a judgement and for overanalysis, you got it. "Just for the sake of argument."

In that case then, based solely off of what you have told me, what makes you any less black than the kettle?

I'm almost sure you just called yourself a hypocrit, I'm just not sure you've realized it.

[Squeezer]

Really? I thought you were trying to back out from a corner for the sake of avoiding an argument.

Don't give me that "there you go again" bullshit. You were doing the exact same thing to Superted that you're accusing me of doing, only once the shoe was on the other foot you start playing the aggrieved and innocent victim.

There. You asked for a judgement and for overanalysis, you got it. "Just for the sake of argument."

Alright then fuck it....fine.

Did I make an incorrect statement about faith? Yes.

Were you right that faith, in certain situations, plays an integral role in our lives? Yes.

Was I wrong to make said blanket statement towards faith, specifically in the facets of Christianity? absolutely.

Did I drag out a wistless argument for the sake of arguing? Yes.

Were you right, was I wrong? Yes.

Are you still an overly anylitical (I seriously can't spell) person? yes, I believe so.

There, I have just conceaded that you are indeed right, and am now admitting that my statement about faith was incorrect, while also admitting that my argument held no legs below them.

Are you happy? Or do you need the last word? Because if not, I suggest we both just fuck off this topic and leave it be.

Congrat-u-fucking-lations.

[ZeUs!!]

Congrat-u-fucking-lations.

Cliff Richard re-mixed for the 21st century^

[NaiLed]

haha, that made me laugh and a shot of snot flew out of my nose