wow, this girl is oly 14!

[Eric is God]

Well yea, that's like how prohibition way back when prohibited the transport, manufacture, or sale of alcohol, but it didn't punish possession of alcohol. It would be impossible to round up something so trivial. Or back when they were thinking about banning contraceptives... it's not like they could just send agents into bedrooms to check and see if married couples are wearing condoms or not.

Forced sterilization is fairly easy to implement and unnecessary to monitor. Give visectomies to 10 million teenage males and sit back to watch society improve.

[Pandagirl!]

I'd just like to clear this up: contraceptives are in no way trivial or a destructive influence, like alcohol and other drugs can be. They are life saving tools anyone should have access to if needed.

Yea I'm not endorsing banning contraceptives, that would just overcrowd the nation and drive more people into debt. But I'm pretty sure that forced sterilization for the sake of sterilization is not a good idea. There are cases where it could effectively be used, yes, but for the most part not so much.

[Squeezer]

some would argue that alcohol is a lifesaving tool.

Civil War surgeons mostly.

[Epinephrine]

Forced sterilization is fairly easy to implement and unnecessary to monitor. Give visectomies to 10 million teenage males and sit back to watch society improve.

You're so bitter.

[Eric is God]

You're so bitter.

You have no idea. The only difference is I'm now projecting it outwards to those who actually deserve it. But that's beside the point. Even though it was proposed in jest, is my theory wrong?

[Epinephrine]

You have no idea. The only difference is I'm now projecting it outwards to those who actually deserve it. But that's beside the point. Even though it was proposed in jest, is my theory wrong?

Well from an economic standpoint, removing that many potential consumers from the general population would ruin the economy.

[Eric is God]

Well from an economic standpoint, removing that many potential consumers from the general population would ruin the economy.

I would argue that you would see an offset in vastly decreased health care, education and social benefits costs. Not to mention the fact that teenagers who don't have children are more likely to obtain higher levels of education and higher paying jobs which would lead to an increase in their spending.

[Epinephrine]

I would argue that you would see an offset in vastly decreased health care, education and social benefits costs. Not to mention the fact that teenagers who don't have children are more likely to obtain higher levels of education and higher paying jobs which would lead to an increase in their spending.

Until we get to the reckoning a few years later when there are no more kids around.

[Money]

GET OUT OF MY THREAD WITH HEALTH CARE AND POLITICS!f

[Money]

This picture has been floating around the internet for a few years so she's probably not a minor anymore

yea seeing how that CTS is like a 2004.

[Money]

condoms are for losers!

[Cops]

did you go to jail cause someone you know used a condom?

[Eric is God]

Until we get to the reckoning a few years later when there are no more kids around.

I didn't say we should sterilize the entire population, just the stupid and inept so maybe 80%. Besides, this planet will not be able to sustain our population in a hundred years so we have 4 choices:

a) colonize other planets
b) let war, famine or disease kill people off
c) limit population growth (sterilization)
d) invent those nifty Star Trek replicators