There has been a few supreme court cases involving car and how it is extended under the unreasonable search and seizure clause in the Fouth Amendment.
A house for example, is a "man's castle", where there are very few exigent circumstances that would allow a police to search without a warrant. However, when it comes to vehicles there is a little more room to breath. For one, vehicles are mobile, unlike houses, and and can allow easy transportation of something that is suspected to be illegal. If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to search a vehicle for contraband, enough cause that would warrant a warrent in another case, an officer can search a vehicle without a warrant (locked glove boxes and trunks with no access from the inside of the car ea. the seats that fold down need warrants).
Now, because there was a the cooler outside of the car and no proof of marijuana, I don't think there would have been probably cause to search the car.
And I agree with gen that you shouldn't ever concent to a search, no matter how innocent you are. My old criminal investigations teacher said if you ever get pulled over and a cop asks to look in your trunk, tell him no, regardless to what you have or don't have in there, because it's a right given to us to say no... I mean, that's more about principal, but they cannot assume or gather probable cause from a refusal to concent to a search.
A house for example, is a "man's castle", where there are very few exigent circumstances that would allow a police to search without a warrant. However, when it comes to vehicles there is a little more room to breath. For one, vehicles are mobile, unlike houses, and and can allow easy transportation of something that is suspected to be illegal. If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to search a vehicle for contraband, enough cause that would warrant a warrent in another case, an officer can search a vehicle without a warrant (locked glove boxes and trunks with no access from the inside of the car ea. the seats that fold down need warrants).
Now, because there was a the cooler outside of the car and no proof of marijuana, I don't think there would have been probably cause to search the car.
And I agree with gen that you shouldn't ever concent to a search, no matter how innocent you are. My old criminal investigations teacher said if you ever get pulled over and a cop asks to look in your trunk, tell him no, regardless to what you have or don't have in there, because it's a right given to us to say no... I mean, that's more about principal, but they cannot assume or gather probable cause from a refusal to concent to a search.
Comment