Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

President Barack Obama

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HeavenSent
    replied
    Originally posted by Liquid Blue View Post
    are you just going to quote yourself until the end of time

    because that would literally be talking to yourself, on an internet forum

    I mean I appreciate you taking up the tinfoil hat niche of the forum, just checking on your priorities.


    That's some Dumb Shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Liquid Blue
    replied
    Originally posted by HeavenSent View Post
    (Reuters) GM shares hit 65-year low amid liquidity concerns
    GM shares have lost nearly 40 percent since Friday when the company reported a deeper-than-expected third-quarter loss and said its cash burn rate had accelerated, as an extended slump in car sales raised questions about the future of the U.S. auto industry.

    Whitehead sees slump worse than Depression
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - The economy faces a slump deeper than the Great Depression and a growing deficit threatens the credit of the United States itself, former Goldman Sachs chairman John Whitehead, said at the Reuters Global Finance Summit on Wednesday.

    Worse than Great Depression?
    (Reuters) Nov. 12 - Former Goldman Sachs Chairman John Whitehead says the current financial crisis could "be a worse depression than the one in the 1930s."

    Edit:
    "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
    -Mayer Amschel Rothschild
    are you just going to quote yourself until the end of time

    because that would literally be talking to yourself, on an internet forum

    I mean I appreciate you taking up the tinfoil hat niche of the forum, just checking on your priorities.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stormwick
    replied
    yay for G20

    Leave a comment:


  • HeavenSent
    replied
    Originally posted by HeavenSent View Post
    The world wanted an 'appearance' of change. Now they have it. Only the 'change' is going to be far more than most wished for or even imagined. You watch... next on the agenda is a meltdown of the world's economy......
    (Reuters) GM shares hit 65-year low amid liquidity concerns
    GM shares have lost nearly 40 percent since Friday when the company reported a deeper-than-expected third-quarter loss and said its cash burn rate had accelerated, as an extended slump in car sales raised questions about the future of the U.S. auto industry.

    Whitehead sees slump worse than Depression
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - The economy faces a slump deeper than the Great Depression and a growing deficit threatens the credit of the United States itself, former Goldman Sachs chairman John Whitehead, said at the Reuters Global Finance Summit on Wednesday.

    Worse than Great Depression?
    (Reuters) Nov. 12 - Former Goldman Sachs Chairman John Whitehead says the current financial crisis could "be a worse depression than the one in the 1930s."

    Edit:
    "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
    -Mayer Amschel Rothschild
    Last edited by HeavenSent; 11-12-2008, 10:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    Originally posted by Kid Kaos View Post
    Why is every nerd on the internet obsessed with NWO bull crap. Bush is NOT an alien, we are NOT stock for the queen of england. Obama is NOT the "omega" president just because u can switch some letters around in his name doesent make it real. I thought alot of people here were smart but you sound like fucking idiots with your conspiracy theory shit. You ant trust what you read on the internet any more than you can trust fox news of your local newspaper. Obama won with a land slide decision and im betting not every single one of those votes was a black man voting for a black president. Which leads me to believe he had to do something right to get where he is now. Dont bother questioning him as president until you see what he does in office.
    thanks, too lazy to type

    Leave a comment:


  • Summa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kid Kaos View Post
    Why is every nerd on the internet obsessed with NWO bull crap. Bush is NOT an alien, we are NOT stock for the queen of england. Obama is NOT the "omega" president just because u can switch some letters around in his name doesent make it real. I thought alot of people here were smart but you sound like fucking idiots with your conspiracy theory shit. You ant trust what you read on the internet any more than you can trust fox news of your local newspaper. Obama won with a land slide decision and im betting not every single one of those votes was a black man voting for a black president. Which leads me to believe he had to do something right to get where he is now. Dont bother questioning him as president until you see what he does in office.
    why do something sensible like that when you could ignore giant concepts and take minute details and contort them into enormous theories that are quite nonsensical?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kid Kaos
    replied
    Why is every nerd on the internet obsessed with NWO bull crap. Bush is NOT an alien, we are NOT stock for the queen of england. Obama is NOT the "omega" president just because u can switch some letters around in his name doesent make it real. I thought alot of people here were smart but you sound like fucking idiots with your conspiracy theory shit. You ant trust what you read on the internet any more than you can trust fox news of your local newspaper. Obama won with a land slide decision and im betting not every single one of those votes was a black man voting for a black president. Which leads me to believe he had to do something right to get where he is now. Dont bother questioning him as president until you see what he does in office.

    Leave a comment:


  • DankNuggets
    replied
    Originally posted by Vykromond View Post
    It should have a bias. The whole point is that religion is nonsensical because the things it purports to explain are eventually explained by science. The idea is to point at an inductive "proof" of the falseness of religious belief. Not making a statement about the validity of the argument, but if you think most religious believers frame their belief explicitly in terms of the "god of the gaps" argument you're wrong.
    I think "most religious believers" have THEIR OWN PERSONAL beliefs. I could be wrong on this, but then again I am a better source, as I actually have a belief in God, and you don't. Since you don't believe in god, you're left to only "believe" (for the sake of arguement) what you see and hear form others.

    I guess it never occurred to you that if there are 400 ppl sitting in a church listening to the same person speaking, they all can and do have different beliefs and interpretations. If one person in the entire church (let's go my way, Lutheran) says that they believe in the bible word for word, it's a different belief than me (who's more of 'your' god of gaps) and a different belief than the person who thinks aliens and god exists. Quite simply, you're lumping your interpretations of my own beliefs with the limited number of observations you've made (probably indirectly too) of people who I'd agree are idiots.

    So if you think most religious believers explicitly don't follow a god of gaps (i seriously hate calling it this, but will go with it for the sake of argument), then you're just plain making generalizations about a culture in which you seem to have little experience, understanding, or lack of attachment sufficient to not sound like a chritian-hating smartass.

    Because quite honestly, you don't have any more insight into what made us as some tribal dude who's never heard of einstein. Unless you're some great scientist, you're just going off of other's theories. Which is what you're complaining about with religion. Yours made be based on science, but in the end, they offer no actual answers that religion doesn't. And any evidence you can find in science is subject to the flaws of how it was observed and the bias of who observed it. just like religion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerome Scuggs View Post
    since when has everyone begun referring to the president as 'commander-in-chief' anyways? the phrase refers to a military commander, not a political leader.

    america, the democracy. led by the commander of all military forces.

    that sounds like something you'd read about a country in South America, not North America.
    but the president is the commander in chief of all military forces.

    Leave a comment:


  • HeavenSent
    replied
    Originally posted by Sarien View Post
    Man I come back like once every six months or once a year.

    I really need another hit of that HeavenSent brand crazy.
    If my brand of crazy is knowing there's more going on in the world than what I'm being told by the mass media, educators, politcians & others so highly regarded in the public's trust, and being compelled to share my findings with the complacent 9 to 5 drones, content with their coveted possessions and proud accomplishments, then I must say, my brand is good and I'm glad you noticed how crazy I am.

    Here's a great hit for ya:

    In David Rockefeller's book "Memoirs" he admits that he is part of a secret cabal working to destroy the United States and create a new world order.

    Here is the direct quote from his book pg. 405

    "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
    -David Rockefeller
    __________________

    Leave a comment:


  • Liquid Blue
    replied
    since forever?

    i can't think of a time when the president hasn't been called the commander in chief

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome Scuggs
    replied
    since when has everyone begun referring to the president as 'commander-in-chief' anyways? the phrase refers to a military commander, not a political leader.

    america, the democracy. led by the commander of all military forces.

    that sounds like something you'd read about a country in South America, not North America.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zerzera
    replied
    God

    because we hope there is a chief of command that has an idea

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    haha for real jeen!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeenyuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Sarien View Post
    Man I come back like once every six months or once a year.

    I really need another hit of that HeavenSent brand crazy.




    I wanted to find the one where he calls Winston Churchill a house Negro, but that'll do I guess.
    sarien, i'm not sure if you will read this but in about 3 weeks i'll need you to be back here churning out christmas hat avatars.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X