Any time's a good time to continue to discuss how the zone's run. Talk from all sides and perspectives is never anything but good. The only time I worry is when people aren't arguing about how it should be run, because then they've stopped caring (or it's the absolutely impossible case, Everything's Perfect for Everyone).
Regarding A1 rules, they're more a relic of the older times. For example, being rude to staff is no longer punishable, as I'm sure many of you know. It resulted in too much abuse on the part of staff. I wouldn't use A1 as anything but a rough guide for our set of rules. Some are enforced more seriously than others. There are also plenty of rules that are enforced but aren't in A1. (Did you know there's a part of the manual called the jeffpotatoes clause, in which players can be banned for intentionally throwing bwjs games?)
Spammingは, it has a very specific definition, and does not include typing quickly when nobody else is typing.
I think we can do with being a bit less conservative on what is punished for racism. One of the very few rules that PriitK requested never be changed is that we enforce certain standards about limiting racist speech. But this doesn't just encompass specific slurs. More and more, there's a lot of borderline racist talk going around. It's starting to get a bit out of hand. And one thing that's easily noticeable by anyone is that when this talk dies down, you see more people playing the game.
The end goal is to have the most people playing the game and enjoying themselves. Regardless of what your moral beliefs are about freedom of speech, etc., in the end this is a video game, and we want people to play it. If someone going on and on with borderline racist comments dissuades others from wanting to play, in terms of our goal to have people playing a video game, it is strategically correct to limit that speech.
Regarding A1 rules, they're more a relic of the older times. For example, being rude to staff is no longer punishable, as I'm sure many of you know. It resulted in too much abuse on the part of staff. I wouldn't use A1 as anything but a rough guide for our set of rules. Some are enforced more seriously than others. There are also plenty of rules that are enforced but aren't in A1. (Did you know there's a part of the manual called the jeffpotatoes clause, in which players can be banned for intentionally throwing bwjs games?)
Spammingは, it has a very specific definition, and does not include typing quickly when nobody else is typing.
I think we can do with being a bit less conservative on what is punished for racism. One of the very few rules that PriitK requested never be changed is that we enforce certain standards about limiting racist speech. But this doesn't just encompass specific slurs. More and more, there's a lot of borderline racist talk going around. It's starting to get a bit out of hand. And one thing that's easily noticeable by anyone is that when this talk dies down, you see more people playing the game.
The end goal is to have the most people playing the game and enjoying themselves. Regardless of what your moral beliefs are about freedom of speech, etc., in the end this is a video game, and we want people to play it. If someone going on and on with borderline racist comments dissuades others from wanting to play, in terms of our goal to have people playing a video game, it is strategically correct to limit that speech.
Comment