Now voting: Forum mods

[gran guerrero]

Vati, I respect your opinion. I do agree that others who wanted to play should have been give a shot as well. But we can't change what other people have done. It's too late. The past is already gone and we are stepping towards a better future. If you choose to not vote because of your convictions then I applaud you. However, I will try to be the best that I can be for what you wanted in a forum moderator. If you can't have quantity, then select quality.

Vote Gran Guerrero

[Crescent Seal]

wtf i had to vote 3 at the same time? thought i could vote one right now and vote again later....but its locked now

[the_paul]

i think jason would fit the role well

allow more campaigning u other fuks

Vote for gran or I'll kill you in mafia every time night 1 even if we're on the same team.

You won't regret your choice.

[Crescent Seal]

Vote for gran or I'll kill you in mafia every time night 1 even if we're on the same team.

You won't regret your choice.

it not allow me 2 vote again got jipped

[H.M.S. Stargazer]

For those who voted for one person, you only get one ballot in any election. The only difference is that you can mark it up to 3 time.

[gran guerrero]

For those who voted for one person, you only get one ballot in any election. The only difference is that you can mark it up to 3 time.

I accidentally made the same mistake as Cres. If u cud allow us to re-vote; I would be happy to share my votes with my fellow candidates.

[kthx]

[the_paul]

For those who voted for one person, you only get one ballot in any election. The only difference is that you can mark it up to 3 time.

Now you tell us. How u jus vs rookie of the year cres out of 2 votes?

[Pressure Drop]

Thee were only 8 'official' applications. The one by you had an attachment with it "i'd be a mod if
- forums staff only special privileges was the removal off banned content and warning/banning those that posted it."

I couldn't guarantee that. And as per your own application that was a must have to be considered.
And of the other two they were nixed by other forum admin. (Not forum smods/mods). We had to make choices that both the forum staff and the public could agree upon.

you never contacted me like the others or dropped me a forum msg to clarify my position if that was the real reason i was omitted. That seems like such an obvious thing to do when you only have 8 candidates ...

so i'm not buying into that at all

[the_paul]

No offense pd but do you think you'd be top 3 if you were added to this list? I'm not trying to knock you or anything, but when you're up against pretty popular forums personalities... If you think you would have then I can understand your disappointment.

Now, if you want to feel better, you'll vote gran guerrero

[kthx]

Thee were only 8 'official' applications. The one by you had an attachment with it "i'd be a mod if
- forums staff only special privileges was the removal off banned content and warning/banning those that posted it."

I couldn't guarantee that. And as per your own application that was a must have to be considered.
And of the other two they were nixed by other forum admin. (Not forum smods/mods). We had to make choices that both the forum staff and the public could agree upon.

When you say this (bolded) it makes me think this is some sort of puppet bullshit and these mods aren't going to have any power to actually fix the problem with the forums (Ara) or to change anything back to the way people want it (seeing every forum with new post). Are these mods going to be able to do or are they just there to give the illusion of giving the people what they want?

[Crescent Seal]

Now you tell us. How u jus vs rookie of the year cres out of 2 votes?

+1, da fuk going on how i jus get noop'd

allow me 2 protest

[Vatican Assassin]

well i voted, it just seems counter to our ideals to lock someone out like PD before we even start

[H.M.S. Stargazer]

you never contacted me like the others or dropped me a forum msg to clarify my position if that was the real reason i was omitted. That seems like such an obvious thing to do when you only have 8 candidates ...

so i'm not buying into that at all

Excuse me for taking your word on what you posted, and really if you want to get all 'judgemental' Its not a good thing to 'Ill be a mod if you change things this way', you should automatically be rejected based on that. Since the other applicants are asking to be mod so they CAN changes things, not have things change before they are 'willing' to be a mod.

My personal feelings for the applicants were not taken into account. If they were, weak would have been one, as would a few others. If you wish to change your current stance on your current application, I would be more than happy to consider you for any mod positions that open in the future. But as for this current ballot, there is nothing more to be done.

[H.M.S. Stargazer]

When you say this (bolded) it makes me think this is some sort of puppet bullshit and these mods aren't going to have any power to actually fix the problem with the forums (Ara) or to change anything back to the way people want it (seeing every forum with new post). Are these mods going to be able to do or are they just there to give the illusion of giving the people what they want?

As I said, the forum work is currently on hold till we get these guys hired. I want their views and opinions involved on all decisions in forum. As it stands, we only have 3-4 active mods, none of which has much say on forum policy anyway. The candidates the admin chose are forum goers who we feel will be best able to contribute to the growth of the forum, and can remain active, while maintaining high standards of ethical moderation.