I cannot believe how incredibly dense you are. I'm talking singularity dense. Let's break down and destroy your argument one point at a time, shall we?
Because the spider... takes more skill? If its easier to fly a warbird, that would directly imply that it takes less skill.
Here you say that spiders shoot randomly and inflict damage without much aim, and that a well placed warbird should could take out (and I stress this) ENTIRE team of spiders and the terrier. And supposing the warbird misses (which is a much greater chance), the spider shots would destroy him so much faster than he could recharge, he'd be in the spawn area before you could whine, "wtf?"
This... is just plain ignorance. Perhaps in an open area, a warbird might have the advantage. But consider that the point of Trench Wars is to capture the flag and hold it for points. To do this, you kind of have to be inside the base, where a spider would have a much better advantage, considering there are less direct shots that the warbird could take.
If, by some incredible stroke of luck, you were actually to find your way to the base, which you seem to be so little aquainted, you would realize that there are side tubes in which you could find your way up to get to the middle base. But I'm sure you were just getting to that.
why be a spider when being a wb is so much easier?
woop di do, spiders can do more random damage in a base match than warbirds. warbirds can easily kill the terrier and spiders. a flagroom battle ends quickly when there are warbirds, and always for the wb's favor unless the enemy spiders get lucky with thier lame random shots.
and any good wb player can easily kill a spider no matter what
i didn't say lancs were lame all the time, but they can be, like when they shoot down the tube
Comment