It is my opinion that the quality of help that people receive from TWs Zone Helpers has degraded. I believe a change in attitude and in the way ZHs are taught to handle things has resulted in a decline in the service that they provide and I think it is time we changed the way we think about ZHing. There are a number of changes we should make.
1. Turf RoboHelp.
Since the creation of RoboHelp ZHs have simply become ‘Bot baby-sitters'. This results in various problems that must be addressed. ZHs have become lazy and unwilling to take a help call that can't simply be answered with a !tell statement from a bot. One ‘on it' point is just as good as another so why take the call that requires you actually explain something? This is why we have had such arguments in the past about the !tell host/nohost and whether or not they should claim those type of ?help calls with ‘on it'.
When people do get help from the bot it is far inferior to the help that they could (and should) receive from a ZH. Quite simply, one sentence from a bot doesn't cut the mustard when it comes to solving a real question from a newbie, the people that ZHs are supposed to serve. A bot cannot go over things step by step or clarify anything. I know from years of experience that more often than not the people with questions need clarification and a bot cannot give that.
RoboHelp is useless, however its database has an incredible wealth of knowledge... Unfortunately it is locked away in a bot and not available to the general public... Unless of course a person uses ?help.. But if we had a system that worked ?help would look up an entry from a database it would solicit an answer from a knowledgeable person. Before the bot is turfed someone should go over the entire database and put the data in categories on a webpage. Not every ZH knows everything, so it would be useful if the ZHs had a place to go and get the information. It should also be available to the general public, which means not putting it on the yahoogroup but instead to make one little html file on tw.org with the information. That would also eliminate the annoying screen where a staffer has to enter their password before they can view anything, and there would be no hunting for the file in the midst of all the folders in the yahoogroup.
2. Adopt official procedure for ZHs to follow when responding to ?help calls
I've said time and time again that RoboHelp is not the correct way to help newbies with their questions.. But what is? During my years of experience as a ZH I think I found the answer. To effectively answer a question the ZH must go to the arena of the person that asked the question. This is to ensure that the ZH gets any response from the person. If someone doesn't know how to change ships we can't guarantee they know how to message people in other arenas. I've had times when I've been helping someone where they reply to me in pub chat... a ZH must be in the same arena as the person asking the question. Messaging from another arena doesn't cut the mustard.
Going to the arena also gets the ZH focused on the person.. I know that if you just type out a quick answer when you're in the middle of an elim match the quality of the answer really suffers.
The ZH must also confirm that the person understands the answer they have received. A ZH must offer to clarify any questions the person may have. In addition to that, naturally, a ZH must be friendly and know the answer to the question. We have many staff so surely at least one would know the answer and all staff must help the others out. We also need to put the RoboHelp database on a webpage so ZHs and players both have easy access to any information they need.
So..
-Go to the persons arena
-Explain nicely
-Confirm they understand
*Must all be done One on One*
ZHing isn't supposed to be as easy as we have been trying to make it. It can be tempting for a ZH to try and answer as quickly as possible so they can get back to the game but that isn't good ZHing. It's also tempting to take a pile of calls at one time and just message people the answers (or !tells) from elim or where ever a ZH might be, but that doesn't help someone that truly doesn't understand something.
3: Test ZHs on a consistent basis.
An experienced staffer should logon to TW with a newbie-style nick name and ask questions from time to time with ?help and make sure the ZH follows to correct procedure and is helpful. If a ZH doesn't do it right then tell them how they can improve. It would be impossible to test every ZH, we might want to test joe but have bob take the call instead, but as long as we keep testing as many as we can we can create an atmosphere on mod chat where people know that there are people out there testing them so when they do something they ought to do it right.
4: Have one person tracking all complaints about ZHs
One person should track and personally reply to every complaint about ZHs. If we get one complaint about a ZH it could be bogus or the ZH might have had a bad day. If we get two, well, lightning doesn't usually strike the same place twice. One person needs to take all complaints and make contact with the complainer and the ZH every single time to get everyones story and make sure everyone feels justice has been done, the situation has been investigated, and the ZH learns something from it.
One person should take care of all complaints about ZHs and test and train every ZH. There aren't too many ZHs and if one smod told every single one that this is how we do things now I believe service would improve and ZHs would start earning the respect of TW players. If the ‘trainer' also tested them and took all complaints that person would get a good feeling on who is doing their job and who isn't very quickly and we would see a major improvement. My thoughts, thanks everyone!
***At very least, turn off RoboHelp!!***
1. Turf RoboHelp.
Since the creation of RoboHelp ZHs have simply become ‘Bot baby-sitters'. This results in various problems that must be addressed. ZHs have become lazy and unwilling to take a help call that can't simply be answered with a !tell statement from a bot. One ‘on it' point is just as good as another so why take the call that requires you actually explain something? This is why we have had such arguments in the past about the !tell host/nohost and whether or not they should claim those type of ?help calls with ‘on it'.
When people do get help from the bot it is far inferior to the help that they could (and should) receive from a ZH. Quite simply, one sentence from a bot doesn't cut the mustard when it comes to solving a real question from a newbie, the people that ZHs are supposed to serve. A bot cannot go over things step by step or clarify anything. I know from years of experience that more often than not the people with questions need clarification and a bot cannot give that.
RoboHelp is useless, however its database has an incredible wealth of knowledge... Unfortunately it is locked away in a bot and not available to the general public... Unless of course a person uses ?help.. But if we had a system that worked ?help would look up an entry from a database it would solicit an answer from a knowledgeable person. Before the bot is turfed someone should go over the entire database and put the data in categories on a webpage. Not every ZH knows everything, so it would be useful if the ZHs had a place to go and get the information. It should also be available to the general public, which means not putting it on the yahoogroup but instead to make one little html file on tw.org with the information. That would also eliminate the annoying screen where a staffer has to enter their password before they can view anything, and there would be no hunting for the file in the midst of all the folders in the yahoogroup.
2. Adopt official procedure for ZHs to follow when responding to ?help calls
I've said time and time again that RoboHelp is not the correct way to help newbies with their questions.. But what is? During my years of experience as a ZH I think I found the answer. To effectively answer a question the ZH must go to the arena of the person that asked the question. This is to ensure that the ZH gets any response from the person. If someone doesn't know how to change ships we can't guarantee they know how to message people in other arenas. I've had times when I've been helping someone where they reply to me in pub chat... a ZH must be in the same arena as the person asking the question. Messaging from another arena doesn't cut the mustard.
Going to the arena also gets the ZH focused on the person.. I know that if you just type out a quick answer when you're in the middle of an elim match the quality of the answer really suffers.
The ZH must also confirm that the person understands the answer they have received. A ZH must offer to clarify any questions the person may have. In addition to that, naturally, a ZH must be friendly and know the answer to the question. We have many staff so surely at least one would know the answer and all staff must help the others out. We also need to put the RoboHelp database on a webpage so ZHs and players both have easy access to any information they need.
So..
-Go to the persons arena
-Explain nicely
-Confirm they understand
*Must all be done One on One*
ZHing isn't supposed to be as easy as we have been trying to make it. It can be tempting for a ZH to try and answer as quickly as possible so they can get back to the game but that isn't good ZHing. It's also tempting to take a pile of calls at one time and just message people the answers (or !tells) from elim or where ever a ZH might be, but that doesn't help someone that truly doesn't understand something.
3: Test ZHs on a consistent basis.
An experienced staffer should logon to TW with a newbie-style nick name and ask questions from time to time with ?help and make sure the ZH follows to correct procedure and is helpful. If a ZH doesn't do it right then tell them how they can improve. It would be impossible to test every ZH, we might want to test joe but have bob take the call instead, but as long as we keep testing as many as we can we can create an atmosphere on mod chat where people know that there are people out there testing them so when they do something they ought to do it right.
4: Have one person tracking all complaints about ZHs
One person should track and personally reply to every complaint about ZHs. If we get one complaint about a ZH it could be bogus or the ZH might have had a bad day. If we get two, well, lightning doesn't usually strike the same place twice. One person needs to take all complaints and make contact with the complainer and the ZH every single time to get everyones story and make sure everyone feels justice has been done, the situation has been investigated, and the ZH learns something from it.
One person should take care of all complaints about ZHs and test and train every ZH. There aren't too many ZHs and if one smod told every single one that this is how we do things now I believe service would improve and ZHs would start earning the respect of TW players. If the ‘trainer' also tested them and took all complaints that person would get a good feeling on who is doing their job and who isn't very quickly and we would see a major improvement. My thoughts, thanks everyone!
***At very least, turn off RoboHelp!!***
Comment