Keep point race/ 30 min game and let the MVP be the one with the most points.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MVP in a timed race game
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GalleleoKeep point race/ 30 min game and let the MVP be the one with the most points.
and FoN, there is things that pppl look for ya, but its hard to explain. Myself i look for like jason said in Wb- terkills, in jav how well he breaks the cram/terr kills/group kills, in Shark/shark team u look how well they can hold the cram/how long they can. How well they protect the team, how well they outshark the opposing team. Its usualy shown. In terr u look howgood his ratio is, how low his deeaths are. All those types of things are put into what i look @ hwo good a person/team does but i think it'd be hard to get a bot to look @ all these things and how to do it._o_2NASRALLAH
Comment
-
let the players (or maybe everybody from both squads online) plus the host vote for mvp, mvp has to come from the winning team. . .
ps. jason, a base bird will never have 3:1 in a close game, i have a hard enough time getting 1:1 even when i'm kicking ass.Philos> I both hate you and like you more than anyone in this game randedl
Philos> there is something about you
Philos> You're like the wife i'd love to fuck, but beat every night after work
PhaTz> we should all wear t-shirts that says "I WAS THERE WHEN RANDEDL LOST TWLD" and on the back, "TWICE"
Comment
-
In the past I've been thinking about implementing some kind of rating system for basing, but I decided that would be no good:
as soon as you start rating performance of each individual ship, you are already determining the role of that ship.
The way we would rate a shark's skill back when lining was popular would be a whole lot different than we would rate that ship now.
And what if a squad developed a strategy in which the bird focuses on killing sharks instead of terriers? Our oh so detailed rating system would not approve of that, and terrier-killing birds will be more 'valuable'.
Whatever rating system we would invent, it will never suffice.
Comment
-
When first timerace match was, i took flag on start and when game ended after 15minutes 900 to 0, i got mvp and yes I was the shark which rushed to flag at the shark.
Well i got mvp as shark there, iv had many with normal rules on base as a shark before too.
Sure i didnt do much else on that match after getting flag and pushing enemy down, spiders took care of the rest.
Well maybe its a vote is good way to determine who's "mvp" in twl or even in base, like bot does arena message that now its time to vote, message me with players name. Then it waits for votes like 10-20 seconds (depens how many ppl in arena probaply..).
Voting will prolly go like the all famous contests goes thought...so it isnt so accurate.
Like somebody said here, dsb has more of stats when game ends, check here for example : http://www.deathstarbattle.com/phpBB...ic.php?t=16909
Ofcourse all ships there is allmost identical and has same purpose, so it cannot be referred straight to tw's settings..
I still like old style where who gets most points gets also mvp, more rewarding
Sorry no time for judge every ship one by one now, ill just say that leave as it is and sharks gets easier some mvp's, just like times before cram ;-)
As a sidenote, it was fun to own nailed who had much more points and kills..Original Mambonian
TWD Head Coordinator
Its frustrating to write these lines after every post^
I'd hope there would be another way..like some automatic system that fills them itself after every post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MythrandirIn the past I've been thinking about implementing some kind of rating system for basing, but I decided that would be no good:
as soon as you start rating performance of each individual ship, you are already determining the role of that ship.
The way we would rate a shark's skill back when lining was popular would be a whole lot different than we would rate that ship now.
And what if a squad developed a strategy in which the bird focuses on killing sharks instead of terriers? Our oh so detailed rating system would not approve of that, and terrier-killing birds will be more 'valuable'.
Whatever rating system we would invent, it will never suffice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PredatoR_FNMWhen first timerace match was, i took flag on start and when game ended after 15minutes 900 to 0, i got mvp and yes I was the shark which rushed to flag at the shark.
Well i got mvp as shark there, iv had many with normal rules on base as a shark before too.
Sure i didnt do much else on that match after getting flag and pushing enemy down, spiders took care of the rest.
Well maybe its a vote is good way to determine who's "mvp" in twl or even in base, like bot does arena message that now its time to vote, message me with players name. Then it waits for votes like 10-20 seconds (depens how many ppl in arena probaply..).
Voting will prolly go like the all famous contests goes thought...so it isnt so accurate.
Like somebody said here, dsb has more of stats when game ends, check here for example : http://www.deathstarbattle.com/phpBB...ic.php?t=16909
Ofcourse all ships there is allmost identical and has same purpose, so it cannot be referred straight to tw's settings..
I still like old style where who gets most points gets also mvp, more rewarding
Sorry no time for judge every ship one by one now, ill just say that leave as it is and sharks gets easier some mvp's, just like times before cram ;-)
As a sidenote, it was fun to own nailed who had much more points and kills..
Comment
-
Voting might be cool if you had multiple categories:
Offensive player of the game
Defensive player of the game
Most Points
vote on the top two... seems like a bit much just to pad some egosMayo Inc. - We should change god's name to "Tod"... see if there's any followers. - Mattey
Comment
-
Originally posted by Force of NatureI've already thought about that. But I wanted input on it anyway. Besides it would be fairer than the current system by miles.
So my point still stands.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MythrandirThe current system (MVP for player with most points) is so uber-flawed that only the newest of newbies think it matters. If you're actually going to make an effort in creating a 'fair' rating system, people would care more about it.
So my point still stands.
Comment
-
The current system (MVP for player with most points) is so uber-flawed that only the newest of newbies think it matters. If you're actually going to make an effort in creating a 'fair' rating system, people would care more about it.Ripper>cant pee with a hard on
apt>yes u can wtf
apt>you need to clear the pipes after a nice masturbation
apt>i just put myself in a wierd position
apt>so i dont miss the toilet
Ripper>but after u masterbaition it usually goes down
apt>na
apt>ill show you pictures
apt>next time I masturbate
Comment
-
Originally posted by Force of NatureThe MVP in timed race really hasn't been implemented. Even I don't know why MVPs are given out. Well I could find out, but I didn't implement anything. So I don't think that was points.sdg
Comment
-
instead of one MVP, it should do like the MervBot flag game does
like
Game over: Winner: Freq X!
---------------------------------------
name squad points wins losses
--------------------------------------
Jerome Juice 89538 55 0
[repeat for all playrs]
--------------------------------------
Most points: Name
Mos tkills: name
best rec: name
most Td's: name
Most Valubale: name [composed of someone who got more than one award, like most points and most kills]
BUT
tO save space and avoid spam, the bot should do:
Game over. PM Bot with !stats to view game stats.
then bot pm's you.-Jerome Scuggs
1:Musashi> BELIM IS RIGGED AGSINT PPL WHO SUCK
warportal> whenever i get in trouble, i think 'what would pearl jam do?'
PEARL JAM> WWPJD
warportal> and then i run away screaming like a girl
PEARL JAM> makes sense
PEARL JAM> i mean..that's what i'd do
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment