Can we get !challengeall defaults changed please?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RageRitual
    This here's my BOOMSTICK!
    • Oct 2006
    • 548

    #1

    Can we get !challengeall defaults changed please?

    Can we get the default challenges from base to 8 from 5 and from dd/jd/fd/sd default changed to 5 from 3 please?
    [TWDT CAREERS]
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
  • Kassius
    DSB
    • Jan 2011
    • 649

    #2
    Don't you just gotta type 1 number after challengeall? e.g. challengeall 5 ?

    Comment

    • Rab
      Quit the game
      • Sep 2012
      • 3526

      #3
      What does this number even do? Just remove it completely?

      Comment

      • Kassius
        DSB
        • Jan 2011
        • 649

        #4
        The number tells the bot whether it's 3s, 4s or 5s, e.g. !challengeall 4 = 4v4

        Comment

        • Rab
          Quit the game
          • Sep 2012
          • 3526

          #5
          Seems pointless to me.

          It's defo true that nobody plays base games smaller than 8v8.

          Smaller wb/jav games happen regularly, so dunno about that.

          Comment

          • qan
            give life, take death
            • Mar 2004
            • 1727

            #6
            How about default for base=8, and the rest still use min number of players to allow squads to add players up to the amount they'd like to play?
            "You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
            -Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

            Comment

            • WillBy
              Let's see if it pays off
              • Jun 2011
              • 2338

              #7
              Originally posted by qan
              How about default for base=8, and the rest still use min number of players to allow squads to add players up to the amount they'd like to play?
              I think that's a good call. 7v7 base happens, but usually we're hoping to get 2 more for 8s, and having to !addplayer midgame sucks. Default 8s ftw

              Comment

              • qan
                give life, take death
                • Mar 2004
                • 1727

                #8
                OK, let's go with that then. Live after next TWD reboot.
                "You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
                -Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

                Comment

                • Grasps
                  Space Invader
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 489

                  #9
                  [ Deleted ]
                  Last edited by Grasps; 10-18-2022, 07:32 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Riverside
                    Registered User
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 727

                    #10
                    Side note: the existing minimum player requirement for twd games in order for bot to start provides flexibility, regardless of what the chosen challenged number of players.

                    existing minimum player requirements:
                    wb/jav: 3
                    basing: 5

                    Hopefully that can remain- have seen dds and jd start with 3 and end with 5 often enough.

                    Comment

                    • qan
                      give life, take death
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 1727

                      #11
                      Current defaults after change: D/J=3 B=8

                      You can also supply a number (and should if you want to play minimum 4s in d/j or not at all). Not required to use defaults, though.

                      Still can change those numbers easily enough if there's a consensus on what they should be.
                      "You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
                      -Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

                      Comment

                      Working...