Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bots don't "make mistakes"
Collapse
X
-
There was a TWL Op who plays TWLD exclusively who witnessed the event.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kthx View PostGive me a break money, this info just came out today. Two inexperienced TWL ops making a decision like this is dumb. Maybe I will ref a basing game this week and make stupid decisions that decide the outcome of that.
SOMEONE IS HACKING THE FLAG! *Killgame...
Seriously have someone who actually knows TWLD there to watch the game.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kthx View PostGive me a break money, this info just came out today. Two inexperienced TWL ops making a decision like this is dumb. Maybe I will ref a basing game this week and make stupid decisions that decide the outcome of that.
SOMEONE IS HACKING THE FLAG! *Killgame...
Seriously have someone who actually knows TWLD there to watch the game.
we need sarien
real talk
Leave a comment:
-
Give me a break money, this info just came out today. Two inexperienced TWL ops making a decision like this is dumb. Maybe I will ref a basing game this week and make stupid decisions that decide the outcome of that.
SOMEONE IS HACKING THE FLAG! *Killgame...
Seriously have someone who actually knows TWLD there to watch the game.
Leave a comment:
-
Mirrorrim and HMS making a TWL-D call like that is pretty stupid considering neither of them warbird, and neither of them have played in competitive play.
Leave a comment:
-
so you voted to allow a team to have 6 players against 5? There was a clear disadvantage there. All the fucking new staff dont know how to host twl including yourself.. This twl is awful.. get some old players as TWL mods, not these 2 year experienced bitches on periods who need to take out their frustration on squads.
If you are going to be an OP, at least have some understanding of 'fair play' and 'bot malfunctions' before you put that shit in the rules. pz dumb ass bitch cunts
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I have to say.. Perhaps the appeal should have been made that the BOTS had made the mistake. Not that an illegal sub had been used.
They made the appeal on the grounds that the sub was illegal. Which in fact it wasnt. The command was sent PRIOR to the death. So the bot substituted the player. The sub itself was a legal sub.
Now had the appeal been on a bot malfunction. They may have had more of a case. Although I do not see this as a bot malfunction rather a lag issue, but it would be open to interpretation.
I was one of the Ops that was there when this happened, and this is my EXACT reasoning for why I voted for a deny.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Unabled View PostWhen you sub as someone dies in twd it says they are out all the time when they arent.. the player still gets the right deaths though
Leave a comment:
-
When you sub as someone dies in twd it says they are out all the time when they arent.. the player still gets the right deaths though
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tragiK View Postwhy is this even up for debate? captains and assistants try to pull off this kind of sub all the time, except most of the time it's a desperation move that results in a 51-xx loss. it's much harder to pull off in twd cuz of the delay, but in twl/twdt there is no delay, you do the !sub command and it executes immediately.
clutch sub and it won them the game, gg.
Leave a comment:
-
Channels
Collapse
Leave a comment: