Originally posted by NaiLed
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Genetic Homosexuals
Collapse
X
-
-
we have our ethics exam divided into two questions:
a) explanation of the question
b) "blah blah some opinion." Discuss.
for exmaple, part B could be "Natural Law is an effective and useful ethics system." Discuss.
so basically i would just list pros and cons, stating if I agree with NL or not.
NL doesn't accept that homosexuals exist; they say that there is only one sexual preference. so i could use this argument to back up that this is not true. or, NL states that it is good to reach your purpose (telos) and that homosexuals having sex would be them forfilling this purpose. this is a contradiction as NL argues that homosexuality doens't exist.
I'm doing AS level thoughLast edited by NaiLed; 06-06-2005, 06:56 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tonewrong, tone, you are forgetting about structural functionalist placement in society and the society factor. it is a well known fact that violent crime is higher in those less privileged. are you to say that coincidentally those in the lowest social standings also have the genes for violence?Originally posted by ToneNo Tone, what i will say is that there is a biologically governed mind state factor in violence and it is the most important factor by far, if it wernt, i think we would see an even wider gap in societal placement and violent offenders. the social standing only agrivates a potential into action slightly more. enactogenic drugs demonstrate how imporant the biological factor is and what is possible
Originally posted by Tonethat is not what a schizophrentic is. a schizoprentic is someone who talks to themselves and their radio all of the time, chain smokes, is socially ackward, and tends not to shower or wipe their asshole after taking a shit and often smells like shit, cannot hold a job or function and is cognitively damagedPeople who are rather more than six feet tall and nearly as broad across the shoulders often have uneventful journeys. People jump out at them from behind rocks then say things like, "Oh. Sorry. I thought you were someone else."
Comment
-
Actually, I thought a small % of those who are gay find the social stigma unbearable and manage to act as if they are straight.
This is not, however, to say that such a forced orientation is good, desirable, or should be attempted over accepting that you are gay.- k2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ToneScience continues to prove that sexual preference and homosexuality is completely 100% Generic.
I am strait -- Not that there's anything wrong with that.Last edited by Arikel; 06-06-2005, 01:48 PM.A kiss is a rosy dot over the 'i' of loving.
Cyrano de Bergerac
Comment
-
Originally posted by TwerpThere's no way that genetics have anything to do with choices in humans. That's just my belief. It's like saying our future is already mapped out and we have no say in it.Girl if it's alright,
100%.
Comment
-
Hahaha Kyace made a funny!Pandagirl!
(ph)>12 is just right
In the most dangerous game...warping will only prolong your defeat. ?go warpwars -Chao <ER>
1:Chao <ER>> what the FUCK?
1:Chao <ER>> I just adverted and no one came
1:Chao <ER>> at all
1:Mantra-Slider> chao
1:Mantra-Slider> you are in the wrong arena
Panda <ZH>> ?find chao <ER>
Chao <ER> - hero
Comment
-
Why is it ok to say that genetics determines sexual preference but I can't suggest that genetics predetermines that women are worse at math and science? There is more of a difference between women and men than straight and gay men.
Reason: it is ok to defend/research/legislate equality but not inequality no matter what the facts or truths are.
<end troll>
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment