Well to each their own
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Am I geeky for wanting this?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by EpinephrineActually what I thought was best about TNG was the exact fact that there were no really ongoing storylines. Aside from the general friendships between the characters, the show was about bigger ideals and bigger things. A lot of the episodes touched on philosophy and important moral issues of the day.
Meanwhile DS9 was just a soap opera in space with some TNG plotlines recycled. The large battles didn't even really start until after Roddenbery died, and I think it's because while he was alive he would never let Star Trek turn into a show about having huge battles, because that's not what Star Trek is about. If I wanted to see huge battles, I would watch Star Wars. Star Trek is something more than mindless battles.
And the battles really aren't *that* big in DS9, there are just more of them (it is war, after all). And if you think DS9 is all mindless battles, then you need to re-watch it. I'd say DS9 deals with more of the effect of war on people than anything (such as eager Jake Sisko ready to taste the front lines for a good story, only to become completely shocked and horrified by what he sees, or that damned infamous "casuality list" including MIA, KIA, WIA, or the Bajoran people recovering after the Cardassian occupation).
Picard is a good captain, but the he seems too perfect and not very realistic. What I love about Sisko is that he is the most human: "I lied... I cheated... I bribed men to cover the crimes of other men. I am an accessory to murder. But the most damning thing of all: I think I can live with it, and if I had to do it all over again, I would."
But like Eric said, to each their own. But I've just recently been able to admit DS9 was my favorite--like in the last few months. I felt like I was betraying my childhood by doing it, but DS9 is just superior.
:grin:Last edited by Saturn V; 11-09-2005, 11:03 PM.Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #98: Every man has his price.
Comment
-
I'd pay to get the entire 7 seasons of the next generation... that was by far my favorite star trek. Voyager after that, original startrek after that, star trek enterprise after that (i've only seen 1 episode), and finally ds9 which was absolute trash.TelCat> i am a slut not a hoe
TelCat> hoes get paid :(
TelCat> i dont
Comment
-
Originally posted by Saturn VWhat I love about Sisqo is that he is the most human: "I lied... I cheated... I bribed men to cover the crimes of other men. I am an accessory to murder. But the most damning thing of all: I recorded that damn Thong Song."
:grin:
And just to point something out for Epi: Roddenberry died in 1991; DS9 didn't hit the air until 1993.
Comment
-
I like this thread, therefore, I am a nerd.
Actually, one of the reasons I didn't really like DS9 is because Sisko (sp?) was too "human". I couldn't believe that such a high-ranking person could be that emotional, yet be so successful in Starfleet. He was such an over-actor that I could never really like him as a character. I really wanted to like the show, though.
I liked Quark's character, however. In TNG, I could never really understand how the Ferengi's could have been so successful as a culture. It's like the writers made the so unlikable, one had to suspend their disbelief. Whereas, Quark had some redeeming qualities, and was pretty smart. It would have been better if they didn't stereotype all the Ferengi's in TNG. Hell---even the Borg had Hue, then that group of underground rebel Borg.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EpinephrineAlmost everyone I know who likes Star Trek in real life agrees that TNG was the pinnicle of Star Trek (with the other series basically recycling a lot of plot ideas).Originally posted by EpinephrineMeanwhile DS9 was just a soap opera in space with some TNG plotlines recycled.Originally posted by Saturn VPlenty of episodes in DS9 deal with philosophy and moral issues. Also religion, equal rights, and racism.Originally posted by jesus=terroristActually, one of the reasons I didn't really like DS9 is because Sisko (sp?) was too "human". I couldn't believe that such a high-ranking person could be that emotional,
DS9 was absolutely the most well written and thoughtful of the series. Why? Because the other shows didn't have to worry nearly the same amount about continuity. It was always zip here in this ship, zip there in that one, oh no, they're going back in time again! I'll stand the Pale Moonlight for writing and acting episode to episode against any from Next Gen, or those horrors Voyager or Enterprise.
Originally posted by jesus=terroristIn TNG, I could never really understand how the Ferengi's could have been so successful as a culture."Sexy" Steve Mijalis-Gilster, IVX
Reinstate Me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SarienTo all the above: DS9 Episode: The Pale MoonlightFerengi Rule of Acquisition #98: Every man has his price.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SarienTo all the above: DS9 Episode: The Pale Moonlight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eric is GodRemind me which episode this one was? One of my personal favorites is the episode where Sisko and Garrek (spelling?) get together to bring the Romulans into the war on Federation's side. The issues of morality and "the greater good" were done extremely well as was the acting.Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #98: Every man has his price.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SarienIn the very first episode they were introduced one takes a communicator pin, bites it and says "Tastes like Gold".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Saturn VSisko Quote
I never saw the Ferengi as comic relief as a culture. Individual characters could be funny or weird or not, but Nog joining the federation in DS9 wasn't really that funny. In the first few episodes yes they had a sense of being more threatening, mostly because of those freaky whips. However TNG in general was pretty much really crappy for the first two seasons. But later on, look at the episode with the Stargazer, with the father looking to take revenge on Picard. That really isn't comic relief either. The culture is greedy and based around financial domination, because they're cowards and weak as a species. I never recalled them as being "the new threat" to the Federation, as that spot was filled Comfortably by the Romulans, and things unknown (Such as the dude that pits the away team against the ferengi in their first episode)."Sexy" Steve Mijalis-Gilster, IVX
Reinstate Me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SarienYeah, the inclusion of your quote as you could tell, wasn't to refute you, was to back you up. We've talked about this before and if you remember, we were in pretty much complete agreement.
I never saw the Ferengi as comic relief as a culture. Individual characters could be funny or weird or not, but Nog joining the federation in DS9 wasn't really that funny. In the first few episodes yes they had a sense of being more threatening, mostly because of those freaky whips. However TNG in general was pretty much really crappy for the first two seasons. But later on, look at the episode with the Stargazer, with the father looking to take revenge on Picard. That really isn't comic relief either. The culture is greedy and based around financial domination, because they're cowards and weak as a species. I never recalled them as being "the new threat" to the Federation, as that spot was filled Comfortably by the Romulans, and things unknown (Such as the dude that pits the away team against the ferengi in their first episode).
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment