9/11 Physics

[Tone]

Unfortunately for you Tone, America has an innocent until proven guilty clause, in which you have to convince a jury of your peers without a REASONABLE DOUBT that what you're saying is true.

Well, if this thread, and any of your other threads are some sort of indication, I don't think you've convinced us. Therefore, you have failed. Now go slit your wrists you Schizophrenic asshole.

wrong, the government has to prove to the american people about what happen with actual evidence, not just 19 photographs. you are fucked

[Subjugation]

Apparently they don't, or they would have. Anything else?

[JeBu]

not that I believe this shit but it's more interesting than tones posts.

http://www.riemurasia.net/jylppy/dis...lbum=12&pos=16

[Tone]

not that I believe this shit but it's more interesting than tones posts.

http://www.riemurasia.net/jylppy/dis...lbum=12&pos=16

whats the matter, care what 'people' will think?

ive seen that flash before and i like it. the FBI will never release any footage of the pentagon bound plane so it can put all the questions to rest, you can count on that

[froedrick]

you're not convincing anyone so stop flogging this horse. It's been dead for four years.

[PH]

[froedrick]

hahaha

[Bioture]

I have a question how can the buildings still fall down if it did?

[Tone]

In concluding....

If you watch the towers crumble to the earth and call that melting steel your fucked in the head. there is no possible way those towers could collapse from jet fuel fires, let alone collapse like a demolition. jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams, there have been far worse fires like the interstate bank building, and the towers (top strongest skyscrapers ever build, dsigned to be impacted by a 707) crumbled to the earth at free fall speed. you should be embarassed to believe such a absurd thing. go watch the DVD '9/11 in plane site' and judge all the footage for yourself.

[froedrick]

You're wrong I'm right. sit

[PH]

And little did the people in those buildings know they would be facing possible certain death that day.

[T3l Ca7]

Tone, you are so right. For years I have suspected that Osama is an alien. He was sent from another planet to colonize earth.

Why else did so many bombs explode in the area and he is still alive? :wub:

Tone, hun, Troll King asked me to tell you that if you can seduce Concreteschlyrd's girlfriend he will give you 30 bucks.


Your Trench War official madam for man hoe department

-Tel

[Bioture]

I have reason to believe that pornography is the true downfall of society.

[T3l Ca7]

Here is the evidence that Bin Laden bribed Bush with a turkey:

[Theif of Time]

In concluding....

If you watch the towers crumble to the earth and call that melting steel your fucked in the head. there is no possible way those towers could collapse from jet fuel fires, let alone collapse like a demolition. jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams, there have been far worse fires like the interstate bank building, and the towers (top strongest skyscrapers ever build, dsigned to be impacted by a 707) crumbled to the earth at free fall speed. you should be embarassed to believe such a absurd thing. go watch the DVD '9/11 in plane site' and judge all the footage for yourself.

Who claimed that? (that the jet fuel melted the steel... strawman argument) Heat causes structural integrity issues. I'm not discounting the idea that bombs were placed at the base... but in my mind, it is feasable that a reaction force could be transmitted through the rigid body of the tower. Forces can be transmitted through rigid bodies very quickly... quick enough to call it 'instantaneous', although its limited by c.
Once again, I believe it was shown that the type of aircraft that hit the WTC was not the type of aircraft that the WTC was 'designed' to be hit by.
One of your points seems to be in proving that the officially accepted version of the WTC collapse is wrong, you prove your position right. This is quite silly...a false dilemma indeed. (For anyone following the ID vs evolution debate in america and also, it seems, in some parts of australia, some ID advocates seem to be of the opinion that proving evolution wrong makes them right by default. Yeah, right.)
In my mind, at least, you have thrown doubt on the supposed reasons for the collapse of the WTC. But that doesn't mean that I believe it was part of some deeper conspiracy.
I just don't believe that what the public saw was all there was to it.