Hart High : White Students Under Threat

[Darius Winds]

http://www.dailynews.com/santaclarita/ci_3764566

EDIT
blame myspace not colored folk
http://cbs2.com/local/local_story_122115542.html

[Jeenyuss]

Oh, it makes sense why he didn't like my avatar then.

[RE-Loader]

The problem with the story is not that it blames anyone but that if it had been 70 white people attacking 20 non-whites shouting "white pride" as they hunted for the non-white females then every single person in America and even europe would have heard about this story. But as the victims are white the media down plays the whole thing.

By creating this thread I am not trying to show that non-whites attack whites especially but that in a multi-cultural society, were we should expect alot more of these kinds of things happening, the media coverage should be equal and not biased against whites.

[Rab]

why cant people just be nice to each other ffs, so many shitheads in the world. ... don't look at me!

[Subjugation]

By creating this thread I am not trying to show that non-whites attack whites especially but that in a multi-cultural society, were we should expect alot more of these kinds of things happening, the media coverage should be equal and not biased against whites.

Yes, I'm quite sure that's why you created the thread---as an objective warning of the perils of inequality, and to contribute to the positive intellectual discourse of this forum.

Yea, I'm so glad GHB got banned. It's so important that we cut down on unnecessary spam posts so we can focus on non-attention whoring, non-trolling posts like this one.

[Jeenyuss]

The problem with the story is not that it blames anyone but that if it had been 70 white people attacking 20 non-whites shouting "white pride" as they hunted for the non-white females then every single person in America and even europe would have heard about this story. But as the victims are white the media down plays the whole thing.

By creating this thread I am not trying to show that non-whites attack whites especially but that in a multi-cultural society, were we should expect alot more of these kinds of things happening, the media coverage should be equal and not biased against whites.

are you on the left or the right?

[Hero*]

The problem with the story is not that it blames anyone but that if it had been 70 white people attacking 20 non-whites shouting "white pride" as they hunted for the non-white females then every single person in America and even europe would have heard about this story. But as the victims are white the media down plays the whole thing.

By creating this thread I am not trying to show that non-whites attack whites especially but that in a multi-cultural society, were we should expect alot more of these kinds of things happening, the media coverage should be equal and not biased against whites.

lol you're a fag.

[Squeezer]

meh, white people have been asking for this shit for hundreds of years now. When you try to conquer, and tame the rest of the world, expect some resentment.

edit: Oh, and thanks for reminding me to check my myspace.

[Liquid Blue]

So because a site called " whitenation" says that white women (oh poor them) were hunted down, and that the white people were gathered in a circle for defense, I'm supposed to belive that over LA times or CBS? Instead of this incident being downplayed, it just makes your 'white nation" source look like it's playing the violin for white people and trying to exaggerate and overblow what actually happened.

If you want to talk about equal coverage, don't use a biased site as a basis.

[Squeezer]

So because a site called " whitenation" says that white women (oh poor them) were hunted down, and that the white people were gathered in a circle for defense, I'm supposed to belive that over LA times or CBS? Instead of this incident being downplayed, it just makes your 'white nation" source look like it's playing the violin for white people and trying to exaggerate and overblow what actually happened.

If you want to talk about equal coverage, don't use a biased site as a basis.

fuck you jungle-bunnie. You know nothing about the difficulties of being white.

EDIT: IM ONLY KIDDING I LOVE LB AND HIS RATHER ENORMOUS BLACK WEINER! :wub:

[Jeenyuss]

So because a site called " whitenation" says that white women (oh poor them) were hunted down, and that the white people were gathered in a circle for defense, I'm supposed to belive that over LA times or CBS? Instead of this incident being downplayed, it just makes your 'white nation" source look like it's playing the violin for white people and trying to exaggerate and overblow what actually happened.

If you want to talk about equal coverage, don't use a biased site as a basis.

oh i saw a commercial for a tv show where a black guy and a white girl get kidnapped and the white girl gets more coverage or something, it's on cbs i think.

[Da1andonly]

ofcourse she got more attention, she's a she.

[Pressure Drop]

i liked this propaganda better
http://forums.trenchwars.org/showthread.php?t=24926

least it was funny, and ment to be so

[ZeUs!!]

The problem with the story is not that it blames anyone but that if it had been 70 white people attacking 20 non-whites shouting "white pride" as they hunted for the non-white females then every single person in America and even europe would have heard about this story. But as the victims are white the media down plays the whole thing.

By creating this thread I am not trying to show that non-whites attack whites especially but that in a multi-cultural society, were we should expect alot more of these kinds of things happening, the media coverage should be equal and not biased against whites.

Strike one for a racist signature

[Vykromond]