The question was posed in Richard Dawkins' most recent publication,' The God Delusion' and I'm wondering what people think.
I don't want to shine too much light on what I actually believe until I've heard what others have to say, but some points to consider:
-What principles are included in religious texts and whether they are relevant or beneficial to todays society.
-Are some religions 'ok' and others bad?
-Is there a point at which religious belief becomes detremental? Fundamentalism/Extremism?
-What acts are done in the name of religion. Terrorism, political agendas and charity are good examples to focus on.
-Other possibilities for our understanding of good, bad and morality.
-If you conclude that we do not derrive morality from religion, does religion serve any purpose?
Note, this isn't the typical 'Science vs. Religion' debate, it's more about the wider social impacts of religion.
I don't want to shine too much light on what I actually believe until I've heard what others have to say, but some points to consider:
-What principles are included in religious texts and whether they are relevant or beneficial to todays society.
-Are some religions 'ok' and others bad?
-Is there a point at which religious belief becomes detremental? Fundamentalism/Extremism?
-What acts are done in the name of religion. Terrorism, political agendas and charity are good examples to focus on.
-Other possibilities for our understanding of good, bad and morality.
-If you conclude that we do not derrive morality from religion, does religion serve any purpose?
Note, this isn't the typical 'Science vs. Religion' debate, it's more about the wider social impacts of religion.
Comment