Space Aliens visiting Earth

[a21ozcoldcup]

proof

Took this photo last summer North of Pittsburgh. Didn't notice the UFOs in the top of the picture until I got it developed.. I'd call that fucking proof.

[Money]

Ok ill get you more, soon, the best ones there are.

are you telling me you watched all the videos posted on all 3 pages of galactic.fileave ?

See, others should go watched them, they are a pleasure to watch

i hate cloakers on TW but these real life UFOs are Cloakers

yea i love watchin vids and yours are interesting cuz they're arent some asshole saying "UFO'S are real!!", no, they are credible videos and yea ppl should watch all 3 pages

[Jeenyuss]

i am the mastermind behind T0NE.

[Tone]

i am the mastermind behind T0NE.

you WISH

[Tone]

Ok lets see here, more videos,

if im going to post more videos that arent on the page i put up, they might not be the very best videos like that page had

heres Dick Cheney saying UFOs are classified

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2NqYbnYOiI

heres an incident that happened in russia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOMb7YlvCGI

heres a UFO video being faked, but there are also real UFOs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkK5mx33Kmg

heres evidence of anomalies on Mars , presented by Dr Tom Van Flandern, former Chief Astronomer for the United States Naval Observatory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u-20g7Bwdw

heres a clip of the TV show Boston Legal doing an episode based on the real life Ohare Airport UFO incident:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJUEij2Qbq4

heres a video of an alleged contactee:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nnYf...36627D&index=0

[flibb]

Flibb would like for you to believe that the objects caught on the space shuttle's cameras are ice crystals and space junk

I would like for some to consider reasonable explanations instead of simply concluding it's aliens. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs however.

[Tone]

I would like for some to consider reasonable explanations instead of simply concluding it's aliens. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs however.

Not bad, reasonable reply. but it will be hard to come up with an explanation for those objects.

And, it may be an error to assume ET is unreasonable. Only by earth physics and earth technology would it seem hard to travel from other star systems. In using Occam's Razor, you first have to be sure of whats the simplest or most reasonable explanation.

In the case of 9/11 its clear, this is a case where people claim Occam's Razor for arab attack, but Occam's Razor actually favors 9/11 being an inside job. i.e. whats more likely, that 19 hijackers with box cutters who failed flight school and many of which are confirmed alive today flew the planes into the towers and the laws of physics temporarily broke down allowing the towers AND BUILDING 7 to collapse at free fall speed and the FBI knew who did it because they found their unburnt passports - OR - 9/11 was a demolition inside job that exactly matches with the motives and benefits of PNAC?

So in the case of 9/11 its easy to see what Occam's Razor favors, easier than the ET subject.

9/11 shows that people are easily programmed with a subjective thought of what is "reasonable"

[SEAL]

So t0ne, why are we not ready for the biggest event in human history?

[Tone]

So t0ne, why are we not ready for the biggest event in human history?

It may be that at the present time it would be to disruptive to society to have mass sightings or landings. it may be that disclosure must take place first and sink in. i dont know

[SEAL]

Why is it to disruptive to society to have mass sightings or landings?
No, seriously.
How often do we go into space? In those rare moments, when they should do a !blueout in the arena, they choose to fly around us, so we will see they're ships moving around? Yet we aren't ready yet? Ironicly the 'evicence' is a white dot...i mean.. come on, a white dot for ffs!




And. I'm actually taking my time for this now. Hoping to make you reconsider your believes for hopefully a few minutes.


Why would they appear visible sometimes, if they can use ship 3 (cloak)? That's QUITE a lack of consistancy. That's quite unprofessional. Even we, humans, can observe the wild life better than they are observing us. That wouldn't be cloaking of them, that would be begging to get noticed.

Let's get into that. So they want to get noticed. "Slowly awakening us". Then, if they want to do that, they should hand us better material, so we would have something that we call proof. Everytime it is just not enough. Isn't that fucking annoying the shit out of you t0ne? It is to me. That ain't slowly awakening us, that's pulling a prank.

Quite hilarious actually. Imagen these two aliens, being bored on a -what we call- sunday afternoon. "Let's uncloak in front of a 0.00001 megapixel camera, haha, so t0ne will run around with a video of us; yet the quality is so poor that noone will believe him and will think it's a frisbee".

Why do they never appear in L.A. while a movie crew is filming HD movie, so they can actually be filmed with acurate footage.




Conclusion you might make is that -IF- they are out here, then they are pulling a big fucking joke on you. You're running around waving with -just not enough- evidence. They're putting a sausage in front of your face, which you can't reach. Both ways, whether they are at earth or not, the joke is on you.



PS. And don't rely on credibility witnesses. Science isn't what my brother heard from a friends friend. I haven't taken the effort, but Im curious what happens when you google "<insert name of credibility witnesses> fraud/fake/lying/collegues telling truth".

[Dameon Angell]

TONE IS THE FINAL CYLON

[ignite ignite]

Shape shifting Reptilian overlords from the Andromeda Galaxy chased me down for reading this thread.

[Zerzera]

9/11 was a demolition inside job that exactly matches with the motives and benefits of PNAC?

Yes, and of course noone would notice the drilling for the holes to plant the explosives, the actual planting of the tons of explosives and the wiring that's needed in order to pull something like that off.
Do you have any idea how much security -and workers (cleaners, janitors whatever)- there would be around in a building like the WTC any moment of the day?

And the hijackers didn't need to pass their flight school, they only needed to be able to navigate. Before the attacks it wasn't as hard to get weapons aboard as it is now. You are only talking hindsight.

[Money]

i dont know what kind of passengers those planes had on them but if some camel jockey with a fucking box cutter is trying to hijack a plane i sure as hell wouldnt be worried about being CUT by his box cutter, why didnt they attack them?

[DoTheFandango]

Where's the KONG when you need it?