Law. The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath.
The breach of an oath or promise.
Pandagirl!
(ph)>12 is just right
In the most dangerous game...warping will only prolong your defeat. ?go warpwars -Chao <ER>
1:Chao <ER>> what the FUCK?
1:Chao <ER>> I just adverted and no one came
1:Chao <ER>> at all
1:Mantra-Slider> chao
1:Mantra-Slider> you are in the wrong arena
Panda <ZH>> ?find chao <ER>
Chao <ER> - hero
how about committing purgery? don't downsize what he did because you are morally okay with lying.
I think rational people are capable of weighing the actual impact of a person's lie rather than saying wholesale that it's all equally immoral. You are not one of these people.
how about committing purgery? don't downsize what he did because you are morally okay with lying.
Can you say purgery to 99% of the Bush Administration. Ignoring Supoenas, The ruin of another country by invasion under false pretenses and the deaths of 100,000 plus civilians? Yeh perjury is bad when the president lies about a blowjob, but Bush and his entire Admin has not only gone beyond a blowjob, they have basically fucked every citizen and working slob in this country up the ass w/o a condom...and shit...they didnt even offer us a reach around!
yeh Dixie Crap Clinton is an asshole and deserved to be impeached upon perjury, but if your sticking up for the nazi like regime running this country, then Heil to you bro!
May your shit come to life and kiss you on the face.
Basically it was a Republican Congress using their political capital to impeach a President that virtually the entire country loved. Clinton's highest approval ratings were in the midst of the Lewinsky Scandal. Americans didn't give a fuck - just some crusty Republicans like Newt Gingrich (and apparently inbred morons like Heroin Bob) who thought they could actually remove the guy that gave them all a big "fuck you" in the FY 1996 Budget negotiations and made them look like a bunch of whiny bitches.
Can you say purgery to 99% of the Bush Administration. Ignoring Supoenas, The ruin of another country by invasion under false pretenses and the deaths of 100,000 plus civilians? Yeh perjury is bad when the president lies about a blowjob, but Bush and his entire Admin has not only gone beyond a blowjob, they have basically fucked every citizen and working slob in this country up the ass w/o a condom...and shit...they didnt even offer us a reach around!
yeh Dixie Crap Clinton is an asshole and deserved to be impeached upon perjury, but if your sticking up for the nazi like regime running this country, then Heil to you bro!
oh wait, he was never on trial under oath in front of a supreme court judge was he? poor mr bush got off on a technicality! THANK GOD PEOPLE FOLLOW THE LAW IN SOME PARTS OF THIS COUNTRY STLL
(RoboHelp)>This message has been sent by Left_Eye:
(RoboHelp)>TW Staff are looking for players who play regulary and are friendly, helpful, knowledgeable and who
(RoboHelp)>show a desire to improving the zone. If you are interested in joining TW Staff, e-mail
(RoboHelp)>TWStaff@gmail.com
(RoboHelp)>If you have any other questions regarding this issue, please use :Left_Eye:<Message>.
Basically it was a Republican Congress using their political capital to impeach a President that virtually the entire country loved. Clinton's highest approval ratings were in the midst of the Lewinsky Scandal. Americans didn't give a fuck - just some crusty Republicans like Newt Gingrich (and apparently inbred morons like Heroin Bob) who thought they could actually remove the guy that gave them all a big "fuck you" in the FY 1996 Budget negotiations and made them look like a bunch of whiny bitches.
recount again any one?
in the immortal words of the liberal gods who created south park
"first we will recount by hands, then heads, then votes, then we will decide what really happened"
sucks when your own party laughs at you
(RoboHelp)>This message has been sent by Left_Eye:
(RoboHelp)>TW Staff are looking for players who play regulary and are friendly, helpful, knowledgeable and who
(RoboHelp)>show a desire to improving the zone. If you are interested in joining TW Staff, e-mail
(RoboHelp)>TWStaff@gmail.com
(RoboHelp)>If you have any other questions regarding this issue, please use :Left_Eye:<Message>.
Basically it was a Republican Congress using their political capital to impeach a President that virtually the entire country loved.
Yes I do understand it was an attempt by the republicans to defame Bill Clinton. Personally, I do not see anything inherently wrong with that: if they want to, and have legal justifications to do so, they are allowed to go with it. I just don't get how any judge - who is supposed to be impartial and neutral in the matter - to even consider having a trial about something that is perfectly legal. What justification is being used to make it legal to have a trial about an act which may be immoral, but is far from illegal?
The problem essentially isn't what he lied about, it's just the fact that he lied under oath. I agree that impeaching someone for a blowjob is a pretty stupid idea, but the fact is that if the President lied under oath, when the President's job is to protect the Constitution and uphold the laws, there's a problem.
Pandagirl!
(ph)>12 is just right
In the most dangerous game...warping will only prolong your defeat. ?go warpwars -Chao <ER>
1:Chao <ER>> what the FUCK?
1:Chao <ER>> I just adverted and no one came
1:Chao <ER>> at all
1:Mantra-Slider> chao
1:Mantra-Slider> you are in the wrong arena
Panda <ZH>> ?find chao <ER>
Chao <ER> - hero
The problem essentially isn't what he lied about, it's just the fact that he lied under oath. I agree that impeaching someone for a blowjob is a pretty stupid idea, but the fact is that if the President lied under oath, when the President's job is to protect the Constitution and uphold the laws, there's a problem.
Absolutely, I agree that lying under oath is a big deal. But what I'm getting at, to put it in TV Show terms (The Practice), why did the following not occur?:
Prosecutor: 'President Clinton, did you or did you not have sexual intercourse with Monica Lewinski'
Defense: 'OBJECTION. The question is irrelevant.'
Judge: 'Sustained'
Comment