Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

the death penalty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stompa
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. 420 View Post
    WE DON'T NEED NO WATER, LET THE MOTHERFUCKER BURN!

    BURN MOTHERFUCKER! BURN!


    I'm all for the death penalty. Eye for an eye bitch.
    I have to weigh my anti-death penalty beliefs with my severe misanthropy and its a crappy conflict of interests.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. 420
    Guest replied
    WE DON'T NEED NO WATER, LET THE MOTHERFUCKER BURN!

    BURN MOTHERFUCKER! BURN!


    I'm all for the death penalty. Eye for an eye bitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stompa
    replied
    Originally posted by genocidal View Post
    Well I am 100% against the death penalty in every case, so that.
    I agree. Also, since watching Prison Break I have become much more learned on the topic of death penalty; you could call me an expert.

    Leave a comment:


  • megaman89
    replied
    give his cellmate Bubba a few packs of cigs and let him finish em off. Save so much more time and money when will people learn

    Leave a comment:


  • FarScape
    replied
    Originally posted by Pressure Drop View Post
    I’m also against the death penalty, in saying that I wouldn’t be very forgiving if anyone ever murdered my sister for example and I would personally want vengeance on them but that is fuelled by emotion and that’s understandable.

    But that sort of retribution shouldn’t really be for the government to decide. Indeed a government and prisons should be more about protecting its citizens than dealing punishment. Prisons should be in the majority of cases more like compulsory rehabilitation and education centres about how their acts affect the greater society and resulted with them being removed from it to protect those they have harmed, so hopefully those that get released back into society will not become a repeat offender.

    For the very serious crimes some of which are such reprehensible acts you question how a human could ever do such a thing, it is more important to find out more about why individuals commit these acts to try and identify a solution and identify others that would be off danger to the public. Life time imprisonment with access too psychiatric researchers would benefit society more so than simply killing the person. Measuring their brain function, blood tests, hormone levels DNA analysis etc … could lead to a pattern emerging and even if it doesn’t they have been removed from society and pose no more risk.

    I was reading the other day that they have identified abnormal cortisol (stress hormone) response to a frustrating task in adolescents that are routinely police cautioned for bad behaviour. Studies like that can yield positive results in the future, perhaps with more research they will be to able to give simple drug much that keeps a better balance and more normal response to hormonal triggers in check.


    Weird how it’s the bible bashing states of America that are so into their death penalties, kinda absurd as surely to them it is up to god to give judgement and not the court judge banging his gavel and saying Death!!!
    Well PD, there are a lot of criminals in jail to study on. If you murder two and sit for 50 years, its the same as you murder 3 and judged to death.

    Although sometimes everyone have this feeling "oh man, that murderer deserve to die", There are two reasons in my opinion why death penalty shouldn't be implement:

    1) some people just don't care to die after their act. In fact, after some murders people suicide, so in a country where there is a death penalty, people who are going to murder might not really fear from death penalty.

    2) I think rotting in jail and mostly, losing the freedom, is the worst punishment someone can take. (tho, some people are feeling good to be fed by the prison system, since they think they wont have better life outside).

    Leave a comment:


  • Pressure Drop
    replied
    I’m also against the death penalty, in saying that I wouldn’t be very forgiving if anyone ever murdered my sister for example and I would personally want vengeance on them but that is fuelled by emotion and that’s understandable.

    But that sort of retribution shouldn’t really be for the government to decide. Indeed a government and prisons should be more about protecting its citizens than dealing punishment. Prisons should be in the majority of cases more like compulsory rehabilitation and education centres about how their acts affect the greater society and resulted with them being removed from it to protect those they have harmed, so hopefully those that get released back into society will not become a repeat offender.

    For the very serious crimes some of which are such reprehensible acts you question how a human could ever do such a thing, it is more important to find out more about why individuals commit these acts to try and identify a solution and identify others that would be off danger to the public. Life time imprisonment with access too psychiatric researchers would benefit society more so than simply killing the person. Measuring their brain function, blood tests, hormone levels DNA analysis etc … could lead to a pattern emerging and even if it doesn’t they have been removed from society and pose no more risk.

    I was reading the other day that they have identified abnormal cortisol (stress hormone) response to a frustrating task in adolescents that are routinely police cautioned for bad behaviour. Studies like that can yield positive results in the future, perhaps with more research they will be to able to give simple drug much that keeps a better balance and more normal response to hormonal triggers in check.


    Weird how it’s the bible bashing states of America that are so into their death penalties, kinda absurd as surely to them it is up to god to give judgement and not the court judge banging his gavel and saying Death!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    He is right, Money. It is cheaper to keep them in jail for life than to administer the death penalty. It sounds weird but it really is true.

    Leave a comment:


  • Saturn V
    replied
    FOR CARDASSIIIIAAAAAAAAA!!!! (rip damar)

    Leave a comment:


  • H.M.S. Stargazer
    replied
    Originally posted by Soup du Jour View Post
    I hear the Cardassians have a pretty good justice system.

    Where's Saturn V to back me up on this?

    The verdict is decided BEFORE you coem to court. The court is just so people feel that justice is served. And the verdict is almost always guilty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    only way u get the death penalty in Texas is capital murder, thats murder as the result of another felony, SUCH AS ROBBING. not everyone gets it tho, only the gruesome ones like kidnappers rapists...the ones who kill their victims and dismemember them yea.. and even then they sit in prison for 15-30 years so w/e

    in fact there is a case in Houston right now of a man who killed his girlfriend hacked her up, bbq'd her..they found at least 3 of HER teeth in his garbage disposal..why waste money on that? yea they can rot in prison all their life...but no matter what u say from TWO states u wont convince me its cheaper to keep one alive for 60+ years than it would to house and execute them after 15


    and hes not facing the death penalty, cuz hes a stand up guy, amirite? laff
    thx

    rofl "In the weeks leading up to the trial, Shepherd's attorneys said that confession should be thrown out because police questioned him after he asked for an attorney." he shouldnt have answered.
    Last edited by Money; 10-02-2008, 03:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • genocidal
    replied
    Originally posted by Money View Post
    how do u figure? ur telling us that a vile of w/e they use for lethal injection costs more than feeding that inmate for 50-60 years? including electricity for his cell, staff to watch over him, washing his clothes, cleaning products for his cell, hygiene products...u did say "system"........after all, we do pay TAXES.

    come on now. thats ridiculous
    It's not ridiculous, it's a fact.
    "For comparative purposes, the Commission adopted a very conservative estimate that seeking the death penalty adds $500,000 to the cost of a murder trial in California. The costs of a second defense lawyer, the background investigation for the penalty phase, and the added duration and expense of the trial for jury selection and penalty trial alone would easily add up to $500,000 in most cases. The current rate of 20 death sentences per year would require 40 death penalty trials per year, for a total added cost of $20 million...

    The costs of confinement can also be estimated with some precision, based upon the Department of Corrections estimate that confinement on death row adds $90,000 per year to the cost of confinement beyond the normal cost of $34,150."
    That's what a commission found in the state of California, the report can be read here.

    Here is what the Comptroller of Tennessee's Treasury Department found in a report conducted in his state (this guy is an accountant, not some left-wing agenda-based hippie).
    Overall, first-degree murder cases in which the prosecution has filed a
    notice to seek the death penalty cost more than life without parole and life
    with the possibility of parole cases. Death penalty cases cost more because:
    • they are more complex
    • more agencies and people are involved in the adjudication of
    the cases,
    • both the prosecution and defense spend more time in
    preparation, and
    • the appellate process has more steps.
    The full report can be read here.

    Any assertions I make will just be re-stating the facts so I'll leave it with this: beyond the dollar signs that taxpayers scamper for, the cost of a human life is incalculable when a mistake has been made.

    Leave a comment:


  • megaman89
    replied
    if that guy really did that he should be shot in both kneecaps then strapped on a bicycle with pedal brakes and placed at the highest and steepest hill and let gravity do the rest.

    all for the death penalty in any case like this. eye 4 an eye

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    Originally posted by genocidal View Post
    The death penalty system is more expensive at the end of the day than life imprisonment.
    how do u figure? ur telling us that a vile of w/e they use for lethal injection costs more than feeding that inmate for 50-60 years? including electricity for his cell, staff to watch over him, washing his clothes, cleaning products for his cell, hygiene products...u did say "system"........after all, we do pay TAXES.

    come on now. thats ridiculous

    Leave a comment:


  • Epinephrine
    replied
    Jerome: Your original post implies that you support the death penalty at least in this case. Isn't the death penalty the ultimate in 'government coercion' and thus against everything that you stand for?

    I'm personally against the death penalty in all cases, so like geno I say don't kill him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Money
    replied
    Some people are just better off dead. I say we bring back the firing squad.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X