Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rules for winning the Nobel peace prize

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Squeezer
    replied
    heh fine, disagree with me. At least you can form complete sentences unlike paradise the forum retard ™

    edit: For instance,

    Originally posted by paradise! View Post
    because I literally meant that the Afghans were talking American jobs.
    Afghans don't "talk" American jobs, nor are they taking them. I have no idea what you meant because I can't understand what you're getting at...ever. I mean what the fuck did you mean? Where the hell did I mention anything about Afghans and jobs? There wasn't even a subtext that makes sense. Was it a joke? Was it an analogy or metaphor? I don't get it. You rarely have a point to make and even more rare is it that you stay on topic. Usually you throw in a bunch of non sequitor insults that fool no one into thinking you're an authority on any topic (except yourself) and only make you look like an even bigger fool. On top of that, no one, not even Exalt, has a poorer level of reading comprehension on these boards. You aren't even able to discern what the topic is about, much less who stands where and why. In short your posts are a waste and I wish you would just get banned. No one enjoys reading your posts (except for me because it gives me an excuse to not do work) and I can't recall a time when anyone agreed with you about anything...ever. Probably because no one knows what you have to say, or what you're saying is so obviously wrong that people don't want to waste their time.

    I, on the other hand, have no problem wasting time :greedy:
    Last edited by Squeezer; 10-19-2009, 03:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattey
    replied
    Originally posted by Squeezer View Post
    No but directors often make the best critics.
    Bullshit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by dchao View Post
    Why does this forum still exist and why are the same people still posting 8 years later?
    we still like to talk about that time we gangbanged your mom.

    hi dennis :flowers:

    Leave a comment:


  • dchao
    replied
    Why does this forum still exist and why are the same people still posting 8 years later?

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattey View Post
    I don't have an unrealistic view of modern war. I would sooner lay down my life than participate in it, because I know what participating in it actually entails.

    Do you believe you have to participate in something to have an opinion of it? Do movie critics have to be directors?
    No but directors often make the best critics. Kinda like hockey players usually make the best hockey coaches, or fat kids growing up to be mocked as sad clowns. They have experience in their respective fields that puts them above you or I.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattey
    replied
    Originally posted by Squeezer View Post
    Not every action is morally clean. I believe it is YOU that has the unrealistic view of war.

    Where do you get off then talking about what should or shouldn't happen in a war?
    I don't have an unrealistic view of modern war. I would sooner lay down my life than participate in it, because I know what participating in it actually entails.

    Do you believe you have to participate in something to have an opinion of it? Do movie critics have to be directors?

    Leave a comment:


  • Galleleo
    replied
    Rofl para, why do you insist on making yourself look so damn stupid?

    And how does "having lectured to tens (?!?!?! Tens?!?!?!) of people" any proof of your self-proclaimed expert opinion on this matter? I can lecture to hundreds of people about whatever you like and I can lie the entire way. Until you have published tons of papers on the subject and are generally considered an authority on the subject by the academic world, stfu and stop being an ignorant idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattey View Post
    Just an observation, darling.

    Edit: Do you believe there are no crimes committed during war time? Do you believe that anything goes in war? Do you think the geneva convention is for faggots? Should you kill yourself?

    The last one is rhetorical, and the answer is yes.
    ooo clever. someone on the interwebs is telling me to kill myself again this week. maybe i'll go do it!

    Do I personally believe that there are crimes comitted in war? Yes. Do I support firebombings and other massively destructive practices? No, but I support the statement that they often work. Tell me bombing factories and villages didn't destroy the morale of Germany in Western Europe, or that the atom bomb didn't absolutely devestate Japan's state of mind.

    Do those regulations actually matter when the bullets and bombs are flying? Probably not. As you said, we're all involved in modern war. There's no escaping, whether you like it or not. If you can't bomb your enemy into submission, they'll do it first. I believe the old saying is, "all's fair in love and war."

    Do you know anything about what it means to fight in a war? I don't believe so. I'm pretty sure you've never had to fight for your life in a battle intensive situation. I doubt you've ever had to differentiate between a civilian and an enemy or worry about being killed at any moment. Battlefields are tense places, war is full of clunky actions. Not every action is morally clean. I believe it is YOU that has the unrealistic view of war (and thus YOU THAT SHULD KILL URESELF LOPL!). Granted, I've never encountered these situations either, but I'm also not naive enough to believe that they can all be solved through judicial practices when there is a war raging all around.

    Where do you get off then talking about what should or shouldn't happen in a war? Like anyone but the Gods can determine what comes about.

    edit: And I think you mistook Summa's post for being literal, when in fact he was being sarcastic. That is in addition to mistaking my opinion for being pro-war, when in fact I'm simply stating that ruthless total war == victory.
    Last edited by Squeezer; 10-19-2009, 02:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattey
    replied
    Originally posted by Squeezer View Post
    Thanks Hemingway.
    Just an observation, darling.

    Edit: Do you believe there are no crimes committed during war time? Do you believe that anything goes in war? Do you think the geneva convention is for faggots? Should you kill yourself?

    The last one is rhetorical, and the answer is yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattey
    replied
    Originally posted by Summa View Post
    America doesn't win wars because we are squeamish about killing now. simple as that. remember the good ole days where we charged into a country and halved their population? yeah! we won them wars! not this whole "only kill the chosen few to remain humanitarian in the world's eye" approach. if you want to win a war, pay the price and level the shit. you can't win wars with pussy tactics (well maybe you can but the cost is far higher on our end)
    You are either joking or completely retarded. US VS THEM HELL YEAH BOMB THEIR CHURCHES WOOO AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!

    Get fucked.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattey View Post
    As soon as war went from soldiers meeting on a battlefield, to "anything goes, we'll bomb your entire village" humanity and decency was lost. Modern war is criminal. Anyone that participates in it, loses their humanity and decency.
    Thanks Hemingway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattey
    replied
    Originally posted by Squeezer View Post
    well, it is war. The point is to kill people. It's not make nice humanitarian exercise time.

    As soon as war went from soldiers meeting on a battlefield, to "anything goes, we'll bomb your entire village" humanity and decency was lost. Modern war is criminal. Anyone that participates in it, loses their humanity and decency.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xog
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeezer
    replied
    Originally posted by paradise! View Post
    I've lectured to tens of people about Sharia, The Muslim brotherhood, and the history of the Taliban, all through reading books.
    your whole online persona is a facade BRO. u b chekin out da hunnyz and lekshuring tens of yo peeps about the sharia law. do u even know what a muslim is? no because pikles are smarter than u. that's the truth bro. no arguing with that.

    Leave a comment:


  • paradise!
    replied
    do you really think you know anything about the afghans ? Their courts are religious based, what part of this are you not getting you bafoon? Do you even know what sharia law is? My man, these guys are in no way an established political presence. They are guerilla fighters. They are regarded as such by their government. They operate by the way of the book, no compromises. This has been evident throughout the Taliban's history.

    I sincerely hope you were being very sarcastic when you put up that "connect the dots" line, i've heard better comebacks from a turkey sandwich my simple minded friend.

    I've lectured to tens of people about Sharia, The Muslim brotherhood, and the history of the Taliban, all through reading books. You, stick to your wikipedia articles.

    "oh dear we are in trouble"


    TO squeezer: 1) lolumad
    2) who in this thread has even mentioned the word Iraq.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X