http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/bu.../26salmon.html
I hear they don't even have to mention in the product if something is genetically modified in the US. Also kind of funny that the producer wants to call it a hybrid instead of genetically modified, just because they've transferred genes from another fish. I hope I never have to eat all these growth hormone meats in my country. Also not giving the consumers a chance to vote with their wallets (not telling them what they are buying) is against the capitalist ideology, or is it?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/he.../04salmon.html
That's the later news where it looks like this will happen.
I hear they don't even have to mention in the product if something is genetically modified in the US. Also kind of funny that the producer wants to call it a hybrid instead of genetically modified, just because they've transferred genes from another fish. I hope I never have to eat all these growth hormone meats in my country. Also not giving the consumers a chance to vote with their wallets (not telling them what they are buying) is against the capitalist ideology, or is it?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/he.../04salmon.html
That's the later news where it looks like this will happen.
Comment