Tweet
Originally posted by Jeansi
18k fps, not bad.
-
fine...
18k fps, not bad.Last edited by Overburn; 08-25-2004, 12:08 PM.Like, there was this ninja who got
ticked off at some people who kept
talking while he was trying to rock
out on his guitar, so the ninja totally
flipped out and sang at them till
they all exploded!!! (true story.) -
highest: 91 fps
Comment
-
good to have you back, vykkyComment
-
can we please have a moment for silence for those who died from black on black violenceComment
-
Hey, whats up with me not haveing a fps when I change my monitor to digital display? analog its 1308'ishComment
-
Ahahaha, I love pokey.Originally posted by Vykromond
5:royst> i was junior athlete of the year in my school! then i got a girlfriend
5:the_paul> calculus is not a girlfriend
5:royst> i wish it was calculus
1:royst> did you all gangbang my gf or something
1:fermata> why dont you get money fuck bitches insteadComment
-
LOL <3, eliteComment
-
There's absolutely no point having fps over your monitor's refresh rate. Usually on 1280-reso monitors can put up maybe 85-100 hertz and that's the max fps it can show.last.fm - Keeping it shortComment
-
Of course more importantly it's limited by the human visual system which pretty much tops out around 60. If there is extremely fast motion in the scene then you can detect differences up a little higher.Last edited by Sleepy Weasel; 08-26-2004, 11:56 PM.Comment
-
You know human's visual system used to be better when we still hunted all our food. We don't need to focus our eyes long distance so often anymore.last.fm - Keeping it shortComment
Comment