Perhaps somewhere in all of this is something that should be addressed. Staff should be responsible for implementing the rules, not interpreting them. This goes for determining a players lag as well as how to post a zoner.
Why even allow cutesy little sayings in advertisements? I don’t buy into the idea that putting these cutesy phases into the advertisement entices anyone to go play the event. So why not simply use standard advertisements and disallow anyone from ‘personalizing’ them? The objective should be simply to let people know an event is starting, it doesn’t need to be entertaining.
And if it is so important to allow staff the freedom to personalize these things, then develop a set of firm guidelines that define actually what and what not can be published. Surely this is less work than training a staffer, having to go and axe them, and then retraining a new staffer.
As for the ‘Tats Situation’, the community doesn’t lose if we don’t lose the lesson. Sounds like he was doing a fairly good job, but clearly he understood he was on probation and needed to be careful. If someone tells you at work that you have messed up and need to lay low for a while and be careful, that’s what you have to do. You have to be responsible for your own actions and behavior. You agreed after the first incident to do just that, but then you screwed up again. Game, set, match.
Why even allow cutesy little sayings in advertisements? I don’t buy into the idea that putting these cutesy phases into the advertisement entices anyone to go play the event. So why not simply use standard advertisements and disallow anyone from ‘personalizing’ them? The objective should be simply to let people know an event is starting, it doesn’t need to be entertaining.
And if it is so important to allow staff the freedom to personalize these things, then develop a set of firm guidelines that define actually what and what not can be published. Surely this is less work than training a staffer, having to go and axe them, and then retraining a new staffer.
As for the ‘Tats Situation’, the community doesn’t lose if we don’t lose the lesson. Sounds like he was doing a fairly good job, but clearly he understood he was on probation and needed to be careful. If someone tells you at work that you have messed up and need to lay low for a while and be careful, that’s what you have to do. You have to be responsible for your own actions and behavior. You agreed after the first incident to do just that, but then you screwed up again. Game, set, match.
Comment