Originally posted by Ephemeral
In my opinion, Chewy started a topic that, while although a legitimate topic, has been addressed in these forums over and over. This lead to several people flaming the thread. Chewy ‘countered’ by becoming abusive and even issuing threats. I wish the thread had been closed then. And I really wish that Cpt.Guano! hadn’t responded to this thread.
My fear is that we have rewarded an approach that attempted a solution in an inappropriate way.
So, for me, the ‘big picture’ is not about the well-known and worn out spawning issue, but rather the fact that it now appears that if someone comes on these boards, is belligerent and begins issuing threats, that this approach works.
In my opinion, Chewy started a topic that, while although a legitimate topic, has been addressed in these forums over and over. This lead to several people flaming the thread. Chewy ‘countered’ by becoming abusive and even issuing threats. I wish the thread had been closed then. And I really wish that Cpt.Guano! hadn’t responded to this thread.
My fear is that we have rewarded an approach that attempted a solution in an inappropriate way.
So, for me, the ‘big picture’ is not about the well-known and worn out spawning issue, but rather the fact that it now appears that if someone comes on these boards, is belligerent and begins issuing threats, that this approach works.
And on my example thing: yes it was a bad one. A really bad one.
And for your car thief story: Oh my god! do you got more stories like that? its hilarious! (or a website or so??) that car thief wouldn't be longer in a court than 30 seconds over here. Next thing you tell me is that you got warning labels on coffee mugs telling the coffee is hot (well duhhh) so they wont get sue'd. Or a warning that you shouldnt put wet animals in a microwaver.
Comment