Tonight, an unfortunate and very preventable injustice has occurred. This post is related to actions that were committed in a very slew-footed manner, undermining any relevance to written rule and practice. I've been appointed responsible for public relations of the squad, as voted by 2 members, and I shall post evidence I was given to support the following TWD atrocity;
A TWDD game commenced and was in the process of adding lines and readying. Epinephrine declared his team unsuitable for play as they were having lag problems (as read in the below screenshot). No question was asked of United Force before the "game was brutally killed", and it is to my belief that the other team has to at least acknowledge the notion to void the game entirely.
This may come off as but a spec of significance to some of you, however I do believe this is not proper in more ways than one. The benefit of being able to pick and choose your games like that is not a luxury a lot of us share, and so respectfully insist that powers to do so are exhibited in proper fashion.
A TWDD game commenced and was in the process of adding lines and readying. Epinephrine declared his team unsuitable for play as they were having lag problems (as read in the below screenshot). No question was asked of United Force before the "game was brutally killed", and it is to my belief that the other team has to at least acknowledge the notion to void the game entirely.
This may come off as but a spec of significance to some of you, however I do believe this is not proper in more ways than one. The benefit of being able to pick and choose your games like that is not a luxury a lot of us share, and so respectfully insist that powers to do so are exhibited in proper fashion.


ameon Angell> I'll put it like this, if it was before round 1 even began, in the line picking, and the !cancel time ran out and a team wants a game killed off, I'd do it, one sided. Fine with me. (Out of chat: I didn't know the !cancel thing was removed.)
Comment