Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IMPORTANT: TWD Reset, Rule change, Roster limit.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mtine
    replied
    Originally posted by the_paul View Post
    And wii you of all people should never question someone else's intelligence. I'll leave it at that. And for my obligatory use of the word: fuck you, you fucking faggot
    I rest my case, your honour. No further questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jason
    replied
    Originally posted by glavitik View Post
    not gonna lie, i didnt read half the nonsense you goons wrote.. what i see, is the same 4-5 awful players, who dont like the idea, posting over and over. 35 players is plenty for a squad. 6-8 to bd, 4-5 for jd,dd. get your little calculators out, add it up, and tell me you dont have enough space for inactive bad players, or has-beens.
    not gonna lie, you're not good enough to call anyone else out as a has-been. time to dismount that high horse, pal.

    if this were twl we're talking about, then sure, to hell with the whiners. it's twd though, and since when does twd need to be so serious? it's really the only thing keeping the game alive at this point, so making it more restrictive when the population has been in steady decline for months and months and months just doesn't make sense. you can't argue that.

    only thing you're trying to argue is that you happen to be someone with a lot of free time who doesn't mind spending a bunch of it on spaceships. you'll have to excuse me if that's not the case for me. nor is it the case for many others.

    really tired of this "fuck you nerds it's just a simple cap" bullshit coming from the people who are, in all reality, the actual nerds who can afford to sit at their computer basically on-call to play a twd match. it's irony to the extreme.

    Leave a comment:


  • meddi
    replied
    I like this new rule.

    It creates threads containing drama and hilarity and thereby makes several minutes of my pathetic work existence go by quicker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zeebu
    replied
    im an awful never was!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • glavitik
    replied
    not gonna lie, i didnt read half the nonsense you goons wrote.. what i see, is the same 4-5 awful players, who dont like the idea, posting over and over. 35 players is plenty for a squad. 6-8 to bd, 4-5 for jd,dd. get your little calculators out, add it up, and tell me you dont have enough space for inactive bad players, or has-beens.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zeebu
    replied
    fuckles!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Reab
    replied
    Originally posted by the_paul View Post
    I was thrust into a captain role on a couple squads, and no we weren't successful in the way dice and thunder were/are, we trained some good players and we did moderately well. The excuse is that people don't have the time, but that there also aren't enough squads? Well something has to give if there's going to be any change.

    Like I said I'm not particularly thrilled about the rule, it affected tenure pretty drastically, but at the same time it's easily managed and COULD facilitate change. Will it? That remains to be seen.

    And wii you of all people should never question someone else's intelligence. I'll leave it at that. And for my obligatory use of the word: fuck you, you fucking faggot
    you didnt use fucks, so i think he is good with your last post

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    I was thrust into a captain role on a couple squads, and no we weren't successful in the way dice and thunder were/are, we trained some good players and we did moderately well. The excuse is that people don't have the time, but that there also aren't enough squads? Well something has to give if there's going to be any change.

    Like I said I'm not particularly thrilled about the rule, it affected tenure pretty drastically, but at the same time it's easily managed and COULD facilitate change. Will it? That remains to be seen.

    And wii you of all people should never question someone else's intelligence. I'll leave it at that. And for my obligatory use of the word: fuck you, you fucking faggot

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome Scuggs
    replied
    Originally posted by the_paul View Post
    I don't really care about this rule either way, I see the pros and cons, but for fucks sake stop using the "not enough leaders" excuse. Running a squad isn't rocket science, it's really not difficult. When I hear that excuse all I think of is a bunch of middle school kids who sit at home instead of going out because they don't want to be the one to make the plans. Just shut the fuck up and do it already, it's easy
    don't wanna vs you on this but I'm gonna have to disagree. it might not require alot of brains but it does require alot of time, effort, nerves, thick skin, patience, dedication, with a pinch of luck. now that I am finally not a captain of a goddamned squad enjoyment received from this game has shot up 150% and I don't have to worry about keeping my squadmates happy, I can just come and go willy-nilly and play TW to my heart's content

    now, do I think the current twd playerbase is capable of generating new squads and squadleaders? absolutely. but it's not going to be immediate and there will more than likely be a bunch of aborted and terrible squads and captains, but that just sounds like the TW dynamic circa 2005/6 to me.

    still think a cap is ridiculous though

    Leave a comment:


  • Jason
    replied
    Originally posted by project dragon View Post
    tenure is not a farm squad. Who we farming to?
    yeah my bad tenure wasn't really started as a farm squad, but it's easy to think of it that way because of the close ties with penetrate.

    so moyst, how about that change of a squadname and i'll sign right up!

    Leave a comment:


  • brookus
    replied
    Why is this even being discussed again? The simple argument against this decision is that Cig Smoke thinks it's a good idea.

    If people are upset about not playing often enough in twd, they would already be leaving their current squad to either form a new one or join a smaller one. This is how things have always worked. I get that twd ops need to feel like they are doing something, but when your something happens to be something Cig Smoke supports, it's time for a long hard look in the mirror.

    But hey... Maybe I'm wrong. If Windreaper/Pearl Jam/Za Gophar form a new twd squad because of this, I will admit I was wrong.

    llater,
    Tony

    Leave a comment:


  • mtine
    replied
    Originally posted by the_paul View Post
    I don't really care about this rule either way, I see the pros and cons, but for fucks sake stop using the "not enough leaders" excuse. Running a squad isn't rocket science, it's really not difficult. When I hear that excuse all I think of is a bunch of middle school kids who sit at home instead of going out because they don't want to be the one to make the plans. Just shut the fuck up and do it already, it's easy
    Can u plz not use this word in at least one of ur posts or are too educated not to?

    Leave a comment:


  • the_paul
    replied
    I don't really care about this rule either way, I see the pros and cons, but for fucks sake stop using the "not enough leaders" excuse. Running a squad isn't rocket science, it's really not difficult. When I hear that excuse all I think of is a bunch of middle school kids who sit at home instead of going out because they don't want to be the one to make the plans. Just shut the fuck up and do it already, it's easy

    Leave a comment:


  • zidane
    replied
    no one a bigger nerd than you turban be serious for 2 minutes. also all these inactive people complaining about no squad y dont u guys all make a squad and play casually together

    Leave a comment:


  • Multipass
    replied
    In my opinion this change is unnecessary at this time. The current newly created squads that are active in twd are many. I have been considering the potential for creating a squad. For staff to impose an unnecessary restriction on the game is unwarrented. Motives are questionable.

    In lue of Freddi Mercury's birthday and the soul of tw I present this thread with soundtrack.

    Play on



    Leave a comment:

Working...
X