Twl roster limits suggestion

[Zerzera]

I agree.

[schope]

i dont see the harm in having a squad with 60 people, if all 60 want to be on said squad.

lets make a squad with 150 ppl so we can all win togheter

[Galleleo]

Sesshoumaru, sure theyd get more "PLAY TIME" with smaller rosters (or thered be less people to rotate), in theory.

but whom is anyone to say that wed have to ex kick out people just so we can play twl.

who we want on squad, and whom wants to be on squad (whether they play or not) is our business, noone elses.

so kicking people off roster to "balance" TWL wont work anyway.

i dont see the harm in having a squad with 60 people, if all 60 want to be on said squad.

You don't have to kick these people of your squad, or of your TWD roster, you just sent in a TWL roster of a max of so many, and the people who arent gonna play anyways, you don't put them on the list, TWD roster should stay unlimited, there is only a choise for TWL roster.

[Sesshoumaru]

Originally posted by Jeansi

I haven't read most of the replies but here's my suggestion:

TWD roster limit: 50
TWL:
Out of all your TWD players, you nominate 10 players for TWLD. Only these 10 can play TWLD in the squad.

Then they nominate 10 more for TWLJ (can be the same, or different people). These ten are now eligable for TWLJ

Then nominate 16 players that are eligable to play TWLB (double the lineup).

What do you think?

This would force single league squads like Heavy and Anti-Scrub to sacrifice way too many players. Heavy would have to leave out 12 of its members and Anti-Scrub 24! of its members.

Displaced, unless Disoblige was planning to recruit up to 50 or 60, I don't see why you dislike the idea. You guys play 3 leagues and your roster is pretty close to 35, the number schope suggested. No one is asking you to kick people off your squad, just don't sign ALL of them for TWL. Last season, Disoblige used a total of 22 players for ALL 3 leagues: bram Cumulonimbus Da1andonly Displaced Mantra-Slider Nethervoid PjOtTeR download Decypha Desperate Aim2kill CrvenBan warportal Ephemeral Fit of Rage No one can kill me Wah!! Lemon Ara X MachineMootland Farmer NaiLed. I'm quite envious of bram, he played almost in every match .

And about the squad with 60 people, sure let's do that, let's have venom/dice/diso all in one squad ok? then nothing will stand in your way

[schope]

Originally posted by Jeansi

This would force single league squads like Heavy and Anti-Scrub to sacrifice way too many players. Heavy would have to leave out 12 of its members and Anti-Scrub 24! of its members.

Displaced, unless Disoblige was planning to recruit up to 50 or 60, I don't see why you dislike the idea. You guys play 3 leagues and your roster is pretty close to 35, the number schope suggested. No one is asking you to kick people off your squad, just don't sign ALL of them for TWL. Last season, Disoblige used a total of 22 players for ALL 3 leagues: bram Cumulonimbus Da1andonly Displaced Mantra-Slider Nethervoid PjOtTeR download Decypha Desperate Aim2kill CrvenBan warportal Ephemeral Fit of Rage No one can kill me Wah!! Lemon Ara X MachineMootland Farmer NaiLed. I'm quite envious of bram, he played almost in every match .

And about the squad with 60 people, sure let's do that, let's have venom/dice/diso all in one squad ok? then nothing will stand in your way

i agree with all ur post less the end of it.

ego would be an obstacle to that squad

[Cig Smoke]

Ego is an obstical in almost any squad. Its how u take the critisism or take a loss and deal with it or get mad and squadleave. Luckily most of dice mite have an ego but they can deal being "picked" on and such.

[Awesome]

Divine Rides - Pallies: 3 leagues, 39 player roster. Fine make the max for 3 leagues 40 players.
Fit of Rage - Disoblige: 3 leagues, 38 player roster. Same as Pallies, make the max # of players for a 3 league squad 40.
Awesome - Pirates: 2 leagues, 26 player roster. That's pretty close to the max schope set for a lj/ld squad(25), no need to bitch so much.

Actually we have 25, kim counts as one despite having 2 names on roster. We also have a bunch of inactive players included in that 25 who we dont want to remove because whenever they come back. Also, we are starting basing and will likely get into TWLB if we keep playing it, so that'd increase our roster limit as dictated by sCHOPe.

However, i never assumed any of this roster limit crap would affect my squad because i doubt we'll have 30 members or more going into TWL. I just dont like the idea's being thrown out. I dont think sCHOPE, tw staff, or anyone else has the right to tell us how many members we should be allowed to have our squad. And if we by some chance do win the championship, it was a squad effort, and i would want all of our current members included in it, not jus the 15-20 who were active in the most recent month or 2. I assume other squads who would have a problem if the limit was included, feel the same. Could be wrong.

And i wasn't "bitching" about it, you're just seeing it the way you want to see it. I was merely giving my opinion, like you were doing. Just because my opinion is different from yours doesn't invalidate my argument.

EDIT:
Also, as i've said in these stupid types of arguments many times before, when it comes down to it, each squad can only put out the same # of players as their opponent. So what does it matter how many bench players they have.

[schope]

so that'd increase our roster limit as dictated by sCHOPe.

Hail sCHOPe !

ps: im not jdigs !

pss: awesome has a gay way to say hey

[Awesome]

kinda weird how you call me gay in every post you make on any of tw's forums yet you tried to make ******* into a frequently used expression/insult.

EDIT:
haha sweet, some forum admit censored it out so you cant post that piece of shit "word" anymore

[bloodzombie]

I don't know what it is with you fuckers trying to control so much. You should be looking at pallies and disoblige as examples of how to make a squad last and stay competetive for an extended period of time, not trying to tell us how we should run our shit.

Sess, You can argue all you want that a roster limit won't really be a hardship, but where's your argument for what it would accomplish. Let's just avoid useless rules.

Can anyone point to a squad that would actually have to cut league-quality people from its roster in order to fit a 35 person roster limit. Even if there is such a squad, I'm betting they'd balance themselves out before the leagues start. Nobody that's good enough to start in leagues will be happy riding a bench all season.

[RogerMexico]

Can someone tell me if this means I won't get my name on the plaque when we finally fucking win something?

[Displaced]

...as i've said in these stupid types of arguments many times before, when it comes down to it, each squad can only put out the same # of players as their opponent. So what does it matter how many bench players they have.

I don't know what it is with you fuckers trying to control so much. You should be looking at pallies and disoblige as examples of how to make a squad last and stay competetive for an extended period of time, not trying to tell us how we should run our shit.

Sess, You can argue all you want that a roster limit won't really be a hardship, but where's your argument for what it would accomplish. Let's just avoid useless rules.

nuff said, cut the crap, let us run our squads.

[Sesshoumaru]

I would understand your point of view if your squads were being affected by this idea, but THEY ARE NOT.

Bloodzombie and Displaced, I am not telling you how to run your "shit", because your "shit" is already being run and it's being done very nicely. Both Pallies and Disoblige play all three leagues, the limit sCHOPe said for a three league squad is 35. Both Pallies and Disoblige have more than 35 members, if you guys dislike the idea of having to exclude(not axe) a couple of your members then we could simply increase the limit to 40, for a three league squad. By the way, Pallies used a total of 30 of its members last season and
Disoblige used 22. This thing rarely affects you guys, I don't even know why I'm arguing with you. If anyone should here giving me arguement it should be people from squads like Anti-scrub, Rune, Ancients, Heavy. Squads that would be forced to change their "TWL AVAILABLE" roster pretty drastically. But not quite, because do you know how many people Anti-scrub used in total last season? Twenty members, half the squad didn't play a single TWLB match. And how many people did Ancients play? 19, and their roster always has more than 30 members.

Maybe I'm wrong and these people that didn't get to play because they had other things to do and couldn't make it to the matches, but I am sure that some did come and were simply ignored. All I'm saying is, if you're not going to play them, then let them know before it's too late ahead in the season.

[bloodzombie]

Twenty members, half the squad didn't play a single TWLB match. And how many people did Ancients play? 19, and their roster always has more than 30 members.

You're not understanding the point... half their squad never played a game.. what good does it do to tell them that they have to cut those people? You think those people are gonna go be stars on some other squad after not playing a single game for A-S last season? Let them keep their people.

We have players that don't play TWL, but they're still part of the team. you're trying to make an assinine rule that says we might have to limit those people if we recruit more talent.

Worry about your own fucking squad, and make rules that affect the game, not rules that limit us just because you feel like it.

[Awesome]

I would understand your point of view if your squads were being affected by this idea, but THEY ARE NOT.

That's the dumbest thing ever. I have to agree with this idea unless it immediately negatively affects my squad?