since we its offseason and people (me) cry when it happens during the season..

[Underground]

Even if everyone played everyone once head2head is still better for chosing that last playoff spot or a seed in playoffs. Obviously if the team beat the other team they are better, or were better that week. If the teamwho lost doesnt have there best lineup or has a no show or something like that that is THIER FAULT! TWL is for the best and ur suppose to have ur best show up every week. If u cant do that then its ur fault for not having depth.

:up:

[PjOtTeR]

Even if everyone played everyone once head2head is still better for chosing that last playoff spot or a seed in playoffs. Obviously if the team beat the other team they are better, or were better that week. If the teamwho lost doesnt have there best lineup or has a no show or something like that that is THIER FAULT! TWL is for the best and ur suppose to have ur best show up every week. If u cant do that then its ur fault for not having depth.

You think 1 game should make the decision if 2 squads tie at the end of the season rather then having All the games of the season count for it.....
Isn't it that if all the games count while making the decision of which squad ends up on the higher position you get the squad that showed "their better line-up" overall on the season.
Cause 2 squads end up tied you decide to give that one game they played against each other the decisive factor.... That is just plain dumb, cause a season consist of +- 10 games... not 1... retards.

[Cig Smoke]

Ya but that last playoff spot is between 2 squads not the rest. In my mind if squad A beats squad B then they are better.

To me there are just to many random factors that can contribute to +/- being off. I mean like ur saying, what if u dont have ur top line 1 game? Well then obviously the team playing u that week will get more +/- then the team playing u next week. Not having the same lineup each week alone makes +/- not fair. Then you have the factors of no shows. This also makes +/- way off. 1 squad gets a huge +/- boost bc someone doesnt show up that week.

Then you have a thing called "replacement squads" Which happen every year, even last year. Think back 2 seasons ago when Shriek was disqualified. Do u really think its fair that some squads had to play shriek in LJ, and then others got to play whipe? That alone messes up the +/-.

I'd agree that +/- would be better if we had the same teams from start to finish of league, if we all played the same schedule and all the teams used the same starting lineup each week, but unfortunaly that never happens and in my mind because of that +/- is worst then head2head.

[brookus]

I always thought that if Team A beats Team B that meant Team A was better than Team B. Apparently some people think differently.

llater,
Tony

[Hero*]

You think 1 game should make the decision if 2 squads tie at the end of the season rather then having All the games of the season count for it.....
Isn't it that if all the games count while making the decision of which squad ends up on the higher position you get the squad that showed "their better line-up" overall on the season.
Cause 2 squads end up tied you decide to give that one game they played against each other the decisive factor.... That is just plain dumb, cause a season consist of +- 10 games... not 1... retards.

Or you could just make each game into 3 games, so like a playoff game. so if they win the best of 3 series and those 2 teams team, the team that won 2 would go on. So now everygame will be 3 games, and u wont need to do +/-. And if people say the games will take too long, make the game up to 25 or some shit, and then for the playoffs make it to 50.

[Cig Smoke]

I always thought that if Team A beats Team B that meant Team A was better than Team B. Apparently some people think differently.

llater,
Tony

You mean ur agreeing with me? YAY! :greedy:

[PjOtTeR]

Any squad could easily win once vs a bad line of any other squad.... does that mean the squad that won is automatically better....
Brookus says so, i guess he's right <_<

nuff said -_-

[pascone]

that statement is worthless cause maybe its a bad line vs a bad line and they still win...if you have weak links on the squad that will lose twl games....axe them

[Cig Smoke]

Its also not fair that one squad gets to play ur weak lineup, but one has to play ur good lineup. That isnt fair in +/- either.

[Sumpson]

+/- ratio gets meaningless with the forfeits which happen a few times each season.

[Kuukunen]

Guess I should commit suicide then.

[Pure_Luck]

should we put up a useless poll about this while we are at it? I think we'll meet with the captains of the chosen teams and decide a few rules like this

[Randedl]

why not just get the captains together before the playoffs to decide which squad is better?

seriously though, i'd rather see an extra week (week 11) for tiebreaks rather than have a game in week 1 decide playoff seedings.

[Cig Smoke]

why not just get the captains together before the playoffs to decide which squad is better?

seriously though, i'd rather see an extra week (week 11) for tiebreaks rather than have a game in week 1 decide playoff seedings.

Thats a good idea also, seeing we already have a week 11 for replay games and such. Might as well use it for tie-breaker games.

[pascone]

why not just get the captains together before the playoffs to decide which squad is better?

seriously though, i'd rather see an extra week (week 11) for tiebreaks rather than have a game in week 1 decide playoff seedings.

should do that


or decide on something?