Appeal for Spastic vs Sweet

[Crescent Seal]

staff has terrible communication with the player base so its not surprising they lack it among themselves too....pathetic

[fLaReD]

wa gwan my yutes

[megaman89]

This is great.

[gran guerrero]

I don't think LF went to different Ops to try and get a yes out of one of them, lol. MM told LF Eelam was in a "unique" situation, and decided that he could play. Sweet can't be penalized for miscommunication within staff, besides, like I said before, the game was won 15-6, not 15-14:45 or some shit, Eelam didn't even MVP, didn't even break 80 kills, I'm sure he wasn't the HUGE impact of this match.

you are still arguing as if spastic is upset with just eelam being allowed to play

we are, but because he was allowed to play when he was told he couldn't

when we were told we were allowed to have 3 players able to play, then an hour before the game were told we weren't

we honestly didn't even think we would have enough to play that game but luckily we did, but that didn't take away our frustration that came from dealing with bullshit.

[Crescent Seal]

[Summa]

Appeal Accepted

The TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.

[Hulk]

lol so stupid

[PrOnEsSim]

I thought replay games were at the end of the season?

[Pressure]

pl pulling strings

[gran guerrero]

If pl was pulling strings he would have gotten sweet to forfeit giving spastic the default win and infinite bursts.

[Creature]

On behalf of Thunder, I'm appealing the game vs Stray where delectable was granted permission by Pure_Luck and pascone (TWL Head OP) to play in that Finals game despite being TW banned. It doesn't matter that it already happened that the decision was already made, presidents pascone and Pure_Luck went against the rules, and MUST be stopped. I didn't personally participate in the game, but I want to see justice being served.

I await your decision, and hope you make the right call. Let TWLD Finals Season 12? be replayed, for the sake of principle.

This.

One of the very few times I'm going to agree w/ Riverside

[Efhat]

The TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.

Joke.

[Riverside]

The TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.

you're actually one of the worst TWL Ops we've seen in a while. bad decision after bad decision.
so goddamn moronic. it's not our fault your ability to run TWL and communicate with your other staff members is non-existent.

[Burnt]

The TWL op consensus is that Eelam was added as an ineligible player to the match, and that the match between Sweet and Spastic will be replayed. Both teams' TWL rosters as of round 2 have been recorded, and only those players will be eligible to be added into the replay. Captains, please come to a consensus on when you want the replay over the next 2 weeks, otherwise I will assign a time.

You should AT LEAST make Spastic beat us 2 out of 3 (with the first game already being played) for it to count since that is what you're doing to Sweet.

[veetee]

Well, your decision is ignorant, deeply unreasonable and one-sided.

We WOULD HAVE NEVER PLAYED Eelam if we weren't given the green light by M_M God in this case. He was not needed because we still had enough depth to find a capable replacement that would be enough to face Spastic. We already didn't put him in lj, but we were told near the end of lj (score 32-40 or close) that he actually IS ALLOWED TO PLAY (all this fuss strongly contributed to my stellar 5-10 lvp that match since i was busy handling squadron's emotions). So, what if I actually subbed him in that LJ - would it also be replayed despite the loss? I actually really regret not doing so.
We can clearly see from this situation that Sweet is the victim of one of the TWL ops' (M_M God's) misjudgement (though I am not annoyed at him for carrying it out). You did not even try to reach a compromise (e.g. best of 3 suggested by Burnt), which further shows how bad-natured, biased and devoid of imagination.

This reasoning is beyond stupid and frustating. I think we should share Sage's fate (though being based on different circumstances) and just boycott this joke that is TWL nowadays (not that I have played it for long, but long enough to witness a considerable drop in the quality of this league's management).

Seeing this, I really do not have any desire to log on any further and be a part of this joke league (no, this is not a retirement post), since such situations really add an asterisk to the final outcome. It is really pathethic to see how unprofessional you guys can be. Perhaps I will rethink my statement once the internet angering cools down so I do not deliver any more no-showups/LVPs for my friends.

Meanwhile, enjoy playing Trench Wars Laugh.

Good night.

Eric Clapton.