Originally posted by Burnt
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Axe reckful
Collapse
X
-
1:Rasaq> i scrub really hard with toilet paper so little pieces of it get stuck to my anus hair and then later on when im watching tv i like to pull them out slowly because it feels pretty good
1:Mutalisk> heard that n1111ga okyo got some DSLs
Paradise> No names but there's actually a black man in the arena right now.
Jones> MAAAAN1111GA UCHIHA
Paradise> NO NAMES. NOT A SINGLE NAME.....but 3/6 of the players on Force are of a certain descent. I will not go any further.
-
Originally posted by RednaZ View PostTiny's appeal is still fucking retarded but this shouldn't even be an appeal? Host should have killed game right then and there and given the win to raid if they had at least 7 players, doesn't matter what a captain thinks.Originally posted by Infrared View PostSince Dudgeon is so furious about this, I'll share what happened from my point of view.
1. I added everyone available and we had 6 players.
2. I pm'd Sheriff and he told me we only need 5.
3. We played the first 12 minutes or so with only 6.
4. 2 more players showed up and we finished the match 8v8.
At no point did the host or Raid's captains say anything was wrong (at least to our squad), so we just played the match out.
I know you guys are butthurt because this may affect your ability to qualify for playoffs, but you didn't play the game.
Since we played the whole game out it should be up to Raid to decide whether they want to appeal it or not.
They don't, so the game results should stand.
Good day sirs
even though there was false information, this decision is wrong in every aspect i look at it.
Comment
-
At no point did the host or Raid's captains say anything was wrong (at least to our squad), so we just played the match out.
I know you guys are butthurt because this may affect your ability to qualify for playoffs, but you didn't play the game.
Since we played the whole game out it should be up to Raid to decide whether they want to appeal it or not.
And again its not against the rules. So yeah, that shouldn't change anything.
PS. I was PMing with M_M god yesterday. And pretty much all I got for an answer was the same things reckful claimed in other thread and cold "You are not going to win this". It's sad.. Just so fcking sad..Season 12 champion TWLD / TWLJ
Season 18 champion TWLJ / TWLB
Season 19 champion TWLB (C)
Season 6 champion TWDT-J TWDT-B (C)
Season 10 champion TWDT-J (C)
Season 11 champion TWDT-B (C)
Season 13 champion TWDT-B (C)
Season 17 TRIPLE CROWN TWDT (C)
The winningest TWDT captain of all time
Comment
-
regardless needing 7 to start is stupid, if you need 4 for LJ that is most likely based on the fact you only need 4 to start a game in TWJD. In a twbd you only need 5 to start the match even if it's an 8v8, why wouldn't it be the same for lb. I'm going to assume that's why the host thought Cobra only needed 5 because it's a logical assumption.
tiny how are you guys still butthurt? you guys got spanked move on
Comment
-
Originally posted by zidane View Posttiny how are you guys still butthurt? you guys got spanked move on1:waven> u challenge
1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary
Originally posted by MHzHope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.
Comment
-
i pretty much entirely agree with rednaz's post. as for the reasoning to not succumb to the appeal it gets pretty murky. why would raid want a replay? they don't give a shit about twlb - didn't they ask to be removed only to have humid basically say nah that's cool? since the mistake wasn't caught before it was made, a replay would be a satisfactory response but impossible as raid clearly doesn't want one. essentially staff is claiming that the appeal is denied because they didn't catch their own fuck up.
Originally posted by zidane View Postregardless needing 7 to start is stupid, if you need 4 for LJ that is most likely based on the fact you only need 4 to start a game in TWJD. In a twbd you only need 5 to start the match even if it's an 8v8, why wouldn't it be the same for lb. I'm going to assume that's why the host thought Cobra only needed 5 because it's a logical assumption.
i think dudgeon's players have ground for the appeal and i think the appeal should've been granted. just my two cents, though.
also tiny, this isn't your fuckin thread so shut the fuck up.Originally posted by turmiojeenyuss seemingly without reason if he didn't have clean flours in his bag.Originally posted by grandI've been afk eating an apple and watching the late night news...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeenyuss View Postalso tiny, this isn't your fuckin thread so shut the fuck up.1:waven> u challenge
1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary
Originally posted by MHzHope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.
Comment
-
This whole game is full of a bunch of whiney crybabies that will do anything and everything to win something, fair or not. We didn't appeal the TWLB match because 1) We don't care about LB and 2) THEY BEAT US FAIR AND SQUARE. Why does every whiney bitch and their cousin come out of the woodworks citing rule 1.03243AB section 22 just so that they can weasel their way into a win (or forcing another team into a loss). The bottom line is that regardless of any rule that anybody can state, cobra is a better LB squad than we are, nobody disagrees with this and most importantly, they proved this yesterday. Cite whatever rule you want, you know they deserve the win over us and thats part of the reason I won't appeal.1:Best> lol why is everyone mad that roiwerk got a big dick stickin out his underwear, it's really attractive :P
3:Best> lol someone is going to sig that
3:Best> see it coming
3:Best> sad
Comment
-
I understand where your coming from reaver, but just because this is about your squad, doesnt mean it's all about your squad. Make sense?1:waven> u challenge
1:waven> if i challenge it looks too scary
Originally posted by MHzHope you contract ebola from your, no doubt cheap, Easter Egg, you fucking shit-jav, pug-faced cunt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fiS View Postwhy hope for next season? this one isnt over yet.
rules are rules. and they "worked" for years. either one adjust the rules before the game, or one sticks to the rules during the game. making new rules during the game is not fair for nobody.
Yes, the rules have worked,but you need people in charge who will actually care to abide by them instead of being lazy and making whatever decision they feel like making at the time based on their own thoughts.Former TW Staff
Comment
-
This rule is stupid, as this game has proven, and should be eliminated. Cobra won fair and square, and people can log on late and help achieve a victory, as they proved yesterday. You should be able to start a TWL game with any number you want -- if the opposing team can't beat you 6v8 or 3v5 they don't deserve the win (Quicksand won a full LD game years ago 4v5 the entire match -- Fierce could probably 3v5 several squads in LD this year.)
Let's be honest here -- we all know Cobra deserved to win, so mods moved backwards from that conclusion to find a hypothesis to justify not applying a very obvious, clear-stated rule. They did not have the required amount of players to start the game, and the rules state they are automatically disqualified -- it's about as clear-cut of an appeal as I've ever seen.
The rules have been inconsistently applied for years, so this is really nothing new, mods always prioritize what they "feel" is right rather than explicitly following the regulations laid out in writing. Should overhaul the Rules section, simplify it to like 1-page, and give TWL Ops more final say given any unique situation -- something they already do.
The TWL ops justification for denying the appeal was bullshit, Dudgeon's appeal is 100% valid -- but frankly I'd rather mods use their heads than blindly follow the rules. The right call was made. Avoid this situation in the future -- Change the Rules.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fiS View Postalthough i don't really agree with the topic title, here's my toughts on this. (they don't really matter, but what ever.)
the decision and the situation is sort of comparable to what happened with the ventrilo incidident, - at least i compare them, and i get fascinating results.
the decisions alone, without the history behind them, are not really thought through and really contradictive. does anyone else notice?
for the vent you go with "the player who did this will be punished. appeal denied though"
that's super contradictive. if it apparently didn't affect ventrilo/gameplay at all, then why ban him? and if it took enough to ban him, why wouldn't you accept the appeal? well, is all the hassle justified? probably not, since both squads will make the playoffs anyway. but the decision has been really contradictive.
As for this appeal. My opinion is of 0 value here, but from my understanding there's two issues at hand: 1) should an appeal be considered if the squad that lost has 0 desire to even appeal? - My personal answer is yes. 2) which rule should take precedence, the 7v8 minimum -> forfeit or the host fucked up -> replay - My opinion would have been, since cobra asked the host in the log multiple times if it was ok to start 6v8, that the replay probably should take precedence over the forfeit. Again, I had/have 0 say in this though for obv reasons.TWDT Head Op Seasons 2, 3, and 4
TWL Season 14 & 17 Head Op
Season 13 TWLD Champion, Seasons 13 & 14 LJ Champion
Winston Churchill: "That is the sort of nonsense up with which we will not put!"
Those who dare to fail miserably can achieve greatly.
- John F. Kennedy
A sadist is a masochist who follows the Golden Rule.
Originally posted by kthxUmm.. Alexander the Great was the leader of the Roman empire, not the Greek empire guy.
Comment
-
lemar> im seriously gonna get someone to hack your name and disolve that shit sqd of yours
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment