Latest G.W. Bush speech 11/30/05

[Epinephrine]

What I got from Telcat post was that she argued against Ephemeral by using herself as an example of not needing intelligence to earn degrees from a prestigious institution.

Amen.

[Kontrolz]

And what would Bush think about this thread you might ask?

[404 Not Found]

And what would Bush think about this thread you might ask?

I love that video...they have the entire video on bushflash.com as well as lots of his other antics when he did not think he was being video taped.

[Squeezer]

I love that video...they have the entire video on bushflash.com as well as lots of his other antics when he did not think he was being video taped.

is that really him?

[404 Not Found]

That's him...not the guy who does the impersonation. That was from his TX Govenor days I believe. They have a new one of him taken from the back as he walks away and extends his arm up and the middle finger clearly visible.

I personally prefer the look of Tom Delay in his favorite evening attire:

[404 Not Found]

here's good ol` Tom delay in his mug shot:

[Pressure Drop]

I've no idea who he is but he appears to think that he is getting his passport photo taken.

Even though i don't know who he is as a general rule i don't like ppl who wear swastikas. i know the nazis stole it from somewhere else but nowadays i find that it is a refrence to Nazis.

I find i don't have alot in common with them as i disagree with their general "superior white race must cleanse the world of the rest" policies

[404 Not Found]

The pics are of the U.S. Congress's Republican majority leader. He had to step down after he was indited with criminal charges of money laundering and more.

These pics have obviously been played with...yet they are fitting for this guy!

The 2nd pic is his actual police mug shot. the swastika was added obviously.

I do not like swastikas either, as many of my parents relatives and friends where killed by the nazi's in WWII. The symbolism is strong and not a positive one for me at all...so please note I am not a nazi symbol pusher in any means!

From what I know...The swastika was a symbol used by American Indians. The nazi's had taken this symbol and tilted it, as the Indians version was squared off and not on an angle.

Tom Delay btw is one of the closest modern day types of politicians that I would compare to a nazi facist bastard!

[froedrick]

Understood and point taken, the context of my reply was limited to US politics.

Thus you were wrong and Cops wasn't. You need to be less bullyish in your arguments man.

[Lucon]

Speaking of taking quotes out of context and exploiting them, I hear there's rumors on the, er, internets...

[Squeezer]

The pics are of the U.S. Congress's Republican majority leader. He had to step down after he was indited with criminal charges of money laundering and more.

These pics have obviously been played with...yet they are fitting for this guy!

The 2nd pic is his actual police mug shot. the swastika was added obviously.

I do not like swastikas either, as many of my parents relatives and friends where killed by the nazi's in WWII. The symbolism is strong and not a positive one for me at all...so please note I am not a nazi symbol pusher in any means!

From what I know...The swastika was a symbol used by American Indians. The nazi's had taken this symbol and tilted it, as the Indians version was squared off and not on an angle.

Tom Delay btw is one of the closest modern day types of politicians that I would compare to a nazi facist bastard!

I agree, even though he's been indicted, he'll probably get off free, because he has loads of cash.

Sigh.

I also hope that Fitzpatrick nails Rove and Libby. I know Rove hasn't been accused yet, but I have full faith in Fitzpatrick, the guy's a man of the law.

[Ephemeral]

Thus you were wrong and Cops wasn't. You need to be less bullyish in your arguments man.

Actually I was simply clarifying the context of my post. I am also pretty sure that virtually ALL my posts are clearly marked with "my opinion is" or "I believe".

Now go back and look at everyone else's posts and see how few do not call them out as simply opinions. So if you are looking to be critical of people who are 'bullyish', you might want to direct it towards those folks who post things as 'fact' when it is clearly not the case. Another issue is that I VERY rarely, if ever, actually launch personal attacks on anyone. I would think that being 'bullyish' would be reserved for people who take that approach.

I also perceive every one of my posts in this thread to be asking people to consider a more moderate view of the topic. So it is interesting to me that you choose this thread to call me 'bullyish'. If you stand back and really think about the fact that I am asking people to consider a view of this topic that is only slightly more to the 'middle', your comment out of line.

Additionally if you do not like my posts, try simply skipping over them. No one is holding a gun to your head making you read them. My opinions are delivered in the spirit of helping people not make the same stupid mistakes I made when I was younger.

More irony is the fact that this was a discussion about people being critical of the intelligence level of the sitting US President and you are being critical of me by using a word that doesn’t exist 'bullyish'. Did you mean 'bullish'?

[ConcreteSchlyrd]

I also perceive every one of my posts in this thread to be asking people to consider a more moderate view of the topic. So it is interesting to me that you choose this thread to call me 'bullyish'. If you stand back and really think about the fact that I am asking people to consider a view of this topic that is only slightly more to the 'middle', your comment out of line.

I believe the whole "a lie is a lie is a lie" argument could be considered "not so moderate."

[Ephemeral]

I believe the whole "a lie is a lie is a lie" argument could be considered "not so moderate."

Lost me, where in this thread did I say something like that?

[froedrick]

It's not a matter of you asking people to take a look at it. The way I read your posts (and I could be wrong) is as if you're Telling me you're right, not "I could be right too, why not take a look at this". It's more of a "listen, I'm right so you should pay attention". That's all. I wasn't being critical just saying that if you want me, or anyone else to listen and actually review how we think, you might want to go about it a different way.