Grant and Hoover, while both Republican, would have had almost completely different views. Much like Earth's magnetic field, the two parties seem to reverse polarity in between the 19th and 20th centuries.
Hell, the fact that "progressive" T. Roosevelt and "laissez-faire" Hoover were both Republicans - followed by "sound money", "budget-balancing" FDR, a Democrat - should show anyone who chooses to look at these 'political labels' the real, face-value of such terms: zero. Perhaps instead of arguing over labels, you should argue over people - because with those three presidents, regardless of political affiliation or party platform, I see a fairly consistent trend of statism and interventionism that, by normal standards, goes completely against every other conception of 'Republican' or 'Democrat' I see in this thread.
But hey, I could be wrong.
Hell, the fact that "progressive" T. Roosevelt and "laissez-faire" Hoover were both Republicans - followed by "sound money", "budget-balancing" FDR, a Democrat - should show anyone who chooses to look at these 'political labels' the real, face-value of such terms: zero. Perhaps instead of arguing over labels, you should argue over people - because with those three presidents, regardless of political affiliation or party platform, I see a fairly consistent trend of statism and interventionism that, by normal standards, goes completely against every other conception of 'Republican' or 'Democrat' I see in this thread.
But hey, I could be wrong.
Comment