I believe Sunny Tzu-Mi-In-But wrote about such strategies in "the art of boners" or some book like that.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rules for winning the Nobel peace prize
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Squeezer View PostAll that he's saying is that there are ways to bomb an ideology out of existence,Mr 12 inch wonder
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mattey View PostThis is exactly what I disagree with. You can not bomb anti-american sentiment out of existance, the act of bombing creates more anti-american sentiment. What is wrong with everyone?
Kill all the men, put all the women and children into slavery except for those that will listen to you.
Thing is we no longer accept such brutality, so we can't win wars anymore.Epinephrine's History of Trench Wars:
www.geocities.com/epinephrine.rm
My anime blog:
www.animeslice.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mattey View PostThis is exactly what I disagree with. You can not bomb anti-american sentiment out of existance, the act of bombing creates more anti-american sentiment. What is wrong with everyone?
edit: I'm not saying its my preferred way, but its possible to make your opponent submit.Last edited by Squeezer; 10-12-2009, 01:23 PM.Originally posted by ToneWomen who smoke cigarettes are sexy, not repulsive. It depends on the number smoked. less is better
Comment
-
Originally posted by genocidal View PostThe goal of those wars isn't to change ideology, it's to eradicate enemies. That is always possible, but like I said very costly. It would probably require hundreds of thousands of troops combing through the entire country and killing with impunity in order to stamp out terror cells/prospective terror cells. Even then, you may still need to just kill them all to make sure. Or perhaps cripple them and then set up a Marshall Plan-type deal to ensure there are no hard feelings. Like I said, very high price - in money and human lives.
Only fake wars like War on Drugs, War on Poverty, and to an extent the War on Terror are unwinnable because you can't end something that always, and probably necessarily, persists.
Mattey is right.
EDIT: also, Afghanistan IS unwinnable. You cannot fight the Taliban in those mountains. It's not possible, ask the russians.4:BigKing> xD
4:Best> i'm leaving chat
4:BigKing> what did i do???
4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
4:BigKing> ???? why though
4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
4:BigKing> xD
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squeezer View Postshutupparadiseyoumakeeverythingworse4:BigKing> xD
4:Best> i'm leaving chat
4:BigKing> what did i do???
4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
4:BigKing> ???? why though
4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
4:BigKing> xD
Comment
-
Originally posted by paradise! View PostCurrently, Gitmo is in the process of being closed. Deadlines for it's complete cessation have been set to january. Don't take the Micheal Steele type arguement by saying "oh hey reconstruction jobs for the olympics are in 7 years. Jobs will not be created UNTIL that day." No, as we speak, the U.S. is negotiating with other countries about where to place them. The numbers in Gitmo are shrinking, simply because it's foreseeable closure. President Bush KNEW of the terrible reputation Gitmo carried, but still kept it open. President Obama saw this, and is shutting it down.
Obama has been open to peace talks more than any other recent president. He has strongly urged, and continues to urge for mideast peace talks. I mean come on trying to get Netanyahu and Abbas to peacefully discuss is no easy task my friend. 2 Opposites living as neighbors, it's hilarious. His urgency has come to fruition, Netanyahu has already told us exactly WHAT he is prepared to negotiate, and what is off the table. The same thing for Abbas.
Netanyahu is not prepared to discuss freezing expansion of jewish settlements. BUT, is prepared to discuss other inhibitory factors of peace in the middle east. This is just one example. It hasn't even been a year yet, and we've already seen progress.
Another example, did you NOT see the French's reaction when Obama was in Strasbourg? Google that shit, the French are waving American flags. Obama has, in less than one year, so changed the american foreign policy that other nations are waving our fucking flags. Does that not speak to you about his policy changes?
Unless Reaver you believe Obama is somehow tricking most UN nations. Why do you think Sarcozy is so eager to meet about diplomatic relations between the two? Why do you think Merkel is eager to discuss germany's role in afghanistan and discuss it's future? Let me tell you, BECAUSE Obama has laid out a plan of OPEN discussion of world problems, and through that plan they each have allowed more channels for discussion. An example of this, so far, (like i said it's only been 9 months maximum) is the worlds role in Afghanistan as well as fighting Terrorism.
I didn't even read all of this, but your point in the very beginning was that gitmo is in the process of being closed. That's great and all but my point remains that he has accomplished so little, too little to deserve the award.
And whether or not he inherited the past president's war's doesn't change the fact that he's in charge now and if he wants to pull troops out he can.1:Best> lol why is everyone mad that roiwerk got a big dick stickin out his underwear, it's really attractive :P
3:Best> lol someone is going to sig that
3:Best> see it coming
3:Best> sad
Comment
-
Yeah, cause suddenly pulling all of your troops out a country that you have laid to shit surely improves world peace. Yeah, that would deserve you that prize for sure, just letting some country implode on itself without taking responsibility for what you have done.Last edited by Galleleo; 10-13-2009, 07:06 PM.Maybe God was the first suicide bomber and the Big Bang was his moment of Glory.
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment