Spin/office
Before anyone buys into your opinion, people will need to know a little more about you and your background. After all, we all know that the topics you promote so aggressively are quite important. We will start with your lack of character.
First, few people will listen to someone who is not honest. Here is a definition of honesty;
Honesty
“The quality or state of being honest; probity; fairness and straightforwardness of conduct, speech, etc.; integrity; sincerity; truthfulness; freedom from fraud or guile.”
You came into the forums under an assumed name (office) and tried to fool people that you were not Spinsanity. This is dishonest, it shows a complete lack of truthfulness. Please explain your actions. Explain why anyone should listen to you when you lie. This also speaks to your honor. My dictionary defines ‘honor’ as;
Honor
“Esteem due or paid to worth; high estimation; respect; consideration; reverence; veneration; manifestation of respect or reverence. That which rightfully attracts esteem, respect, or consideration; self-respect; dignity; courage; fidelity; especially, excellence of character; high moral worth; virtue; nobleness, integrity; uprightness; trustworthness;. A sense of what is right, just, and true, with course of life correspondent thereto; strict conformity to the duty imposed by conscience, position, or privilege.”
Your action of coming in to the forums with deception reflects that you have no honor or trustworthiness. No one will listen to your opinions because of this. Again, without trying to make some other argument about Bush and your agenda, tell us why we should listen to someone who has attempted to lie and deceive. Moving to your opinion and personal agenda. People need to feel that the person they are listening to are ‘fair’ and ‘impartial’. Returning to my dictionary, it defines ‘fairness’ as:
Fairness
“Characterized by frankness, honesty, impartiality, or candor; open; upright; free from suspicion or bias; equitable; just; -- said of persons, character, or conduct; as, a fair man; fair dealing; a fair statement.”
Your arguments show absolutely no understanding that there are two sides of any perspective. If you showed this understanding…that you MIGHT be wrong, that you MIGHT not have all the information, people MIGHT listen to you. In fact, you come across as being completely fanatical. Definition:
Fanatic
”Pertaining to, or indicating, fanaticism; extravagant in opinions; ultra; unreasonable; excessively enthusiastic, especially on religious or political subjects. A person affected by excessive enthusiasm, particularly on religious or political subjects; one who indulges wild and extravagant notions and opinions.”
If you want others to listen to you, you will need to convince them that you are an ‘expert’ in a subject. Expert is defined as;
Expert
“Taught by use, practice, or experience, experienced; having facility of operation or performance from practice; knowing and ready from much practice. An expert or experienced person; one instructed by experience; one who has skill, experience, or extensive knowledge in his calling or in any special branch of learning.”
Perhaps you can pause long enough from your diatribe to supply us some information on your expertise for this topic. You have shown NO original thinking about the topic, only the ability to cut and paste other’s opinions. Please supply us with references, a list of the research, and other examples of your experience you have had on this topic.
If you can properly answer these questions, people might actually listen to you. If you can't supply this information, if you answer with more cut and paste diatribe, you are what everyone thinks you are, a moron.
Moron
“A person whose intellectual development proceeds normally up to about the eighth year of age and is then arrested so that there is little or no further development.”
Before anyone buys into your opinion, people will need to know a little more about you and your background. After all, we all know that the topics you promote so aggressively are quite important. We will start with your lack of character.
First, few people will listen to someone who is not honest. Here is a definition of honesty;
Honesty
“The quality or state of being honest; probity; fairness and straightforwardness of conduct, speech, etc.; integrity; sincerity; truthfulness; freedom from fraud or guile.”
You came into the forums under an assumed name (office) and tried to fool people that you were not Spinsanity. This is dishonest, it shows a complete lack of truthfulness. Please explain your actions. Explain why anyone should listen to you when you lie. This also speaks to your honor. My dictionary defines ‘honor’ as;
Honor
“Esteem due or paid to worth; high estimation; respect; consideration; reverence; veneration; manifestation of respect or reverence. That which rightfully attracts esteem, respect, or consideration; self-respect; dignity; courage; fidelity; especially, excellence of character; high moral worth; virtue; nobleness, integrity; uprightness; trustworthness;. A sense of what is right, just, and true, with course of life correspondent thereto; strict conformity to the duty imposed by conscience, position, or privilege.”
Your action of coming in to the forums with deception reflects that you have no honor or trustworthiness. No one will listen to your opinions because of this. Again, without trying to make some other argument about Bush and your agenda, tell us why we should listen to someone who has attempted to lie and deceive. Moving to your opinion and personal agenda. People need to feel that the person they are listening to are ‘fair’ and ‘impartial’. Returning to my dictionary, it defines ‘fairness’ as:
Fairness
“Characterized by frankness, honesty, impartiality, or candor; open; upright; free from suspicion or bias; equitable; just; -- said of persons, character, or conduct; as, a fair man; fair dealing; a fair statement.”
Your arguments show absolutely no understanding that there are two sides of any perspective. If you showed this understanding…that you MIGHT be wrong, that you MIGHT not have all the information, people MIGHT listen to you. In fact, you come across as being completely fanatical. Definition:
Fanatic
”Pertaining to, or indicating, fanaticism; extravagant in opinions; ultra; unreasonable; excessively enthusiastic, especially on religious or political subjects. A person affected by excessive enthusiasm, particularly on religious or political subjects; one who indulges wild and extravagant notions and opinions.”
If you want others to listen to you, you will need to convince them that you are an ‘expert’ in a subject. Expert is defined as;
Expert
“Taught by use, practice, or experience, experienced; having facility of operation or performance from practice; knowing and ready from much practice. An expert or experienced person; one instructed by experience; one who has skill, experience, or extensive knowledge in his calling or in any special branch of learning.”
Perhaps you can pause long enough from your diatribe to supply us some information on your expertise for this topic. You have shown NO original thinking about the topic, only the ability to cut and paste other’s opinions. Please supply us with references, a list of the research, and other examples of your experience you have had on this topic.
If you can properly answer these questions, people might actually listen to you. If you can't supply this information, if you answer with more cut and paste diatribe, you are what everyone thinks you are, a moron.
Moron
“A person whose intellectual development proceeds normally up to about the eighth year of age and is then arrested so that there is little or no further development.”
Comment