Originally posted by Desperate
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TWL! Important Poll #2
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
You don't really have any argument behind that basing should be decided by points, other than that is has always been like that. Why not change it a little bit to get the game more fair, exciting and varying?1: cundor> let's do a disoblige .?go base
1: Cremation> cundor desperately trying to tell the world hes a diso
1: cundor> dude
1: cundor> i already told my parents
1: Desperate> LOL
1: Cremation> HAHA
1: bram> :)
1: Da1andonly> LOL
Comment
-
Bc u should keep it atleast the same atleast somewhat. Points race is really the same thing as Time race cept its done by points, why not use that?
And i dont realy mind the whole time race thing either way is "ok" with me. Afterall what i say isnt much of a difference, but i do think points should determine the winner not "time" but either way i suppose is fine. What we are basicaly doin is argueing the same point back and forth which is getting useless desp so i'll just give in to u rite now since it dont matter what i argue anyway
On a side note, i would of liked to been able to atleast vote for time race_o_2NASRALLAH
Comment
-
Haha you're right there.
And you're also right about that we should have been able to vote for time race. It's just that it got invented (I think) right after we started this poll.1: cundor> let's do a disoblige .?go base
1: Cremation> cundor desperately trying to tell the world hes a diso
1: cundor> dude
1: cundor> i already told my parents
1: Desperate> LOL
1: Cremation> HAHA
1: bram> :)
1: Da1andonly> LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by GalleleoThe least you can do is straighten this MVP thing back out, and just give it to the one with most points._o_2NASRALLAH
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cig SmokeYa its a nice thing to try to get other ships MVP to, but its just stupid of no one knows how to do it. Atleast either 1 change the format if it isnt working and/or tell us how u get mvp in each ship. B4 everyone knew most points = mvp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cig SmokeBasing was made for points. NOt the flag. Grant u need the flag to get more points, but in a FR fight if u let them have flag for a lil bit just to get the opertunity to push them back into a corner, or surround them its worth it. With time race letting them sit on the flag is hurting. Every secound of flag will count. I jsut dont like the whole idea of it, but i didnt like the point race either, now i dont think its all that bad. I still think the 30 minute games is the best and most fun for myself.
Just because this zone is filled with insecure recwhores it doesn't mean this teamgame was ever about someones rec and comparing it with others.
Your second point is totally bullshit, it goes against everything that is called milking. If you push a team into the ear it would only matter if you had flag.
Now it doesn't matter if you don't have flag for those 5 seconds. You just totally crush them and kill their terrier in 15 seconds without flag. And before they are back in flagroom (wich you will be defending) you gain much more time than those 15 seconds.
Originally posted by Randedlbasing isn't just about the flag, if it was you wouldn't need weapons or repels, you could just have 16 people sitting on top of it and seeing who gets it the most.
basing is about kills, points, bounty (believe it or not) and the flag, it's supposed to incorporate all of the aspects of tw into one game.
I wonder how many timed games you played before you formed your opinion.You ate some priest porridge
Comment
-
As i said b4 i seen some games recently where the winning team had LESS points then the losing team. So it isnt exactly all true what ur saying. Yes u do need the flag for more points per kill, yes u need to kill to keep flag, but now u dont need to kill as much or as fast as u can. Now u sorta just sit back and "milk" the flag, so to say. Points dont really mean anything now.
But as i said b4, its useless to argue the fact. Its gonna be time race atleast for now in TWD. NO use in argueing anythin about it._o_2NASRALLAH
Comment
-
With Time Race, it's a little different strategy.... going right to a cram is a lot more dangerous then trying your hardest to keep the enemy in lower... or even out of lower for that matter. During last season, we saw that a lot of times teams that needed dire points would abandon lower all together and head right for the cram, not utilising the whole playing field.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PaulOakenfoldWith Time Race, it's a little different strategy.... going right to a cram is a lot more dangerous then trying your hardest to keep the enemy in lower... or even out of lower for that matter. During last season, we saw that a lot of times teams that needed dire points would abandon lower all together and head right for the cram, not utilising the whole playing field.
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment