Tie Breaker solution-Continued

[Awesome]

i dont like the idea of a squad getting priviledges like makeup games when they cant show enough in the first place. they dont deserve a 2nd chance at a win if they cant show up... and whatabout the squad that did show up the first time, what if they dont show up for the rematch?

if a squad doesnt show up for the scheduled time, the win should go 50-0 to the squad that did show, ...in my opinion.

[Violence]

r u retarded. in the summer people are busy alot and cant make it to a certain match, squads have 2 postponements during season and they have 2 postpone 48 hours b4 ther match. not everyones a nerd like u awesome.

this would solve the following problems:
less know shows
more competitve games

[Sheep]

wtf? vio is fag. even i know it. l0l0lpol00l0lol he looks like Terrance & Phillip from South Park. (a fartin Trashcanhead)

[Orgazmo]

BANANA PHONE? AHAHAHAH WTF IS THAT MAN....... TURN IT DOWN, SHEEP MAN YOU THREW THAT REMOTE PRETTY FUCKING HARD MAN... PRETTY FUCKING HARD

[Randedl]

i would actually think that winter leagues would be harder to attend?

for anybody under 18 you have school 5 out of 7 days a week plus homework and sports.

for alot of people above that, you have college or university which involves even more homework. if you live on campus, chances are that the lag is too bad for you to play.

that's just my opinion.

[Crazy Canockout]

Awesome, you forgot my other point, and that was that if a team didn't show 5 more than once, they would be disqualified... They can't do it every week you... bum. LoL.

[Awesome]

for alot of people above that, you have college or university which involves even more homework. if you live on campus, chances are that the lag is too bad for you to play.

agreed

[Kim]

TW would be the leading cause of University dropouts

[Violence]

awesome u r actually the biggest nerd alive. lookl at ur post count GOD DAMNIT.

[Lews Therin]

I don't like the "you pirates" stuff as I like, and have argued for, head-to-head before. I think however that it has significant problems:

1. Leaves the chance of a significantly worse squad going in ahead of a better one because of bad scheduling luck.
2. A > B > C > A problem. If three teams are tied and each has beaten one and lost to one (see diso, pirates, ancients in LD this season) who is ranked above who? Head-to-Head cannot work in this situation, so you have to have an alternative method.

Thats not to say +/- doesn't have its problems, I still favor head-to-head when usable, but I'd like to see +/- as a backup when you run into situation two with the following modification:

1. Make fofeit wins 30-0, +30 is bested only rarely so it covers the problem of rewarding people into forfeiting as opposed to playing 4(one of the past problems of 25-0), but it is also deals with +50 being just way too much as thats more than double the average margin of victory.

[Violence]

2. A > B > C > A problem. If three teams are tied and each has beaten one and lost to one (see diso, pirates, ancients in LD this season) who is ranked above who? Head-to-Head cannot work in this situation, so you have to have an alternative method. - lews

possibly the dumbest thing ever, THATS WHY HEAD TO HEAD IS UR FIRST OPTION AND IF THERES A 3 WAY TIE THEN U LOOK AT +/-. GOD U NERDS MUST NEVER HAVE PLAYED SPORTS b4 HOLY CRAP.